Pages: 1 ...309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317... 626
It does not work to the highest taxa. Ie Dipteru introduce, and it takes only foty, certain subsidiaries to Diptery taxa, but not until Diptery. Now everything is derived, including and "Diptera sp".
Male. He's such a nogasty unlike females. Yesterday, all of the world's nogastogo beetle uploaded: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/42790 :))
Corrected data. Coleoptera / Imago / Svetlana Shchavelina → Gerania boscii / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Coleoptera / Imago / Svetlana Shchavelina → Gerania boscii / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Coleoptera / Imago / Svetlana Shchavelina → Gerania boscii / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Batocera victoriana / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Aristobia approximator / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Again kick the French site: http://www.coleoptera-atlas.com/cerambycidae-chrysomeloidea/lamiinae/batocerini/rosenbergia/Rosenbergia-straussi There's this kind of mistake is exposed as a Rosenbergia straussi Gestro, 1876 But the same blooper is inherent to many souvenir sellers: http://www.insectopia.ru/index.php?productID=667 And considering that the Tob according to some major share of the ...
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Batocera rubus / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Note: many sources of barbel incorrectly defined as a subspecies of the sulphurea of another member of the genusCelosterna pollinosa Example: http://www.coleoptera-atlas.com/cerambycidae-chrysomeloidea/lamiinae/lamiini-agniini/Celosterna/Celosterna-pollinosa-sulphurea That is true certain: Celosterna pollinosa var. sulphurea Heller, 1907 : http://www.cerambycoidea.com/foto.asp?Id=1867 ...
There are doubts, that here and in the adjacent images caterpillars Parasa consocia, they are a little bit more http://www.jpmoth.org/Limacodidae/Limacodinae/Parasa_consocia.html. And it is ratherParasa hilarata, uncommon in view of the Primorye http://www.jlpazy.com/www/main/Show.asp?PicID=540 and http://www.bubuleps.com/Parasahilarata.php.
We begin a new campaign translations, including comments. Concerning: 1. Remember, in the form of posting commentaries there is a window of translation into English. If you speak the language well - please unsubscribe to transfer, preserving all the tags (if you use them in Russian comments). 2.If you do not know English - consider when writing a commentary in Russian, which he later will be ...
Corrected data. Not identified → Costaconvexa caespitaria / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.
Corrected data. Not identified → Pelurga taczanowskiaria / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.
Ты че это, надумал коллекцию сливать?Ты чо!!!!!!!!!!!!! Ет так ряды чистим ! долго просто думал!))))))))))))
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Argynnis paphia / Confidently identified / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.
Here is the reference for new subspecies: http://www.catalogueoflife.org/col/details/species/id/cd8450659d34e9b0c8489a26ae56c7fc
Peter, I have not quite get it, should I give the reference? Usually you or moderators added species/subspecies. Here is the reference, just in case: http://www.gbif.org/species/104857692 и http://gni.globalnames.org/name_strings?page=413&search_term=ns%3AGAS*
While writing a thesis on the Geometridae moths of the Tver region (Russia), I collaborated with Elena M. Antonova (Zoological Museum of Moscow State University). She was the biggest expert on Geometrids (at least for the European part of Russia). I've got problems with distinguishing Dysstroma truncata and D. citrata. From Elena M. Antonova I heard something like this: "Don't worry, you couldn't ...