Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370... 629

05.02.2015 18:55, Alexander Belousov: comment on photo #38871

And I, of zhe.Somneniya there, but still I think it is closer to Limenitis helmanni duplicata f. pryeri . This, too, with a wide sash, and more reddish than Limenitis doerriesi.

05.02.2015 10:01, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38876

Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Aporia crataegi / Confidently identified / Male & female / Yuri Semejkin.

05.02.2015 9:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #38873

Corrected data. Not identified → Polygonia c-aureum / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

05.02.2015 8:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #38874

Corrected data. Not identified → Nymphalis vaualbum / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

05.02.2015 8:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #38875

Corrected data. Not identified → Nymphalis xanthomelas / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

05.02.2015 8:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #36175

Corrected data.

05.02.2015 6:51, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #38865

Looked Alexander! In general, if you look at 37 the region, I am at your option P. cultralis amurensis (Romanoff, 1887). Dr. Nearby alternatives I would call P. ussurialis (Bremer, 1864), know a few tops priostrёnnye lane. KRL. The nature of the bond of slightly different, the general background of KRL. . So that will have to delete it. If we take al. Similar features of both species, they ...

04.02.2015 21:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27092

Corrected data. The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

04.02.2015 21:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27105

Corrected data. The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

04.02.2015 18:13, Vladimir Deryabin: comment on photo #38836

No, it's the only shot.

04.02.2015 17:45, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #38847

_semi_argus :)

04.02.2015 11:46, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38846

Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Plebejus optilete / Confidently identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.02.2015 11:04, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38844

Corrected data. Not identified → Limenitis sydyi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.02.2015 10:45, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38842

Corrected data. → Neptis rivularis.

04.02.2015 9:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #38817

Down with this. tin-plate

03.02.2015 20:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33691

Corrected data. Confidently identified → Tentatively identified.

03.02.2015 8:15, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38841

Corrected data. Not identified → Minois dryas / Confidently identified / Alexander Belousov.

02.02.2015 18:50, Nikolay Grebennikov: comment on photo #38820

This species is identified correctly.

02.02.2015 18:50, Nikolay Grebennikov: comment on photo #38819

This species is identified correctly.

02.02.2015 8:19, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38834

Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Carterocephalus silvicola / Confidently identified / Male / Yuri Semejkin.

02.02.2015 8:17, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38833

Corrected data. Not identified → Carterocephalus silvicola / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

02.02.2015 2:36, Mikhail F. Bagaturov: comment on Systematic list of Palearctic Woodcock Beetles (genus Lethrusscopoli, 1777)

WELL, this is a further topic of work

01.02.2015 21:58, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38818

Corrected data. Not identified → Mythimna turca / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

01.02.2015 20:25, John-ST: comment on Classification

http://coleop123.narod.ru/syst2.htmlА почему верблюдки и большекрылые подотряды сетчатокрылых, вроде они уже давно самостоятельные отряды?И на фото для верблюдок не Inocellia crassicornis, а кто-то из Raphidiidae, на птеростигме хорошо видна ...

01.02.2015 17:29, Shapik: comment on Vitaliy Nikolaevich Tanasiychuk passed away

Bright memory.

01.02.2015 13:09, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21203

Corrected data. Not identified → Idaea macrospila / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

01.02.2015 13:07, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38794

Corrected data. Not identified → Diarsia canescens / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.02.2015 13:05, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38807

Corrected data. Not identified → Catocala promissa / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

01.02.2015 13:04, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #3802

Corrected data. Xanthorhoe biriviata / Vasiliy Feoktistov → Xanthorhoe quadrifasiata / Basil Sergienko.

31.01.2015 20:42, Nikolay Grebennikov: comment on photo #38630

This species is identified correctly.

31.01.2015 20:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Earias flavida

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.

31.01.2015 17:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #38803

Igor, I remind you that I do not associate in groups of butterflies for users on a permanent basis, and only bug fixes. Therefore, I ask you to associate your own custom groups :)

31.01.2015 17:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #38802

Corrected data.

31.01.2015 17:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Narosa concinna

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.

31.01.2015 17:08, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38793

Corrected data. Not identified → Mythimna grandis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

31.01.2015 16:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #38798

The 18th of January bore definition Irina vaguely remembered that somewhere already seen this vredina :) And finally he found himself in the bins .....