Please, move it to Danaus eresimus, only D. eresimus has white spots on the underside of the hindwings.
Similar, but it's not her. Serena is found in the southeast Africa, and I caught this one in the Gambia, the very west of Africa http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=214353. Rather it is A.eponina
more in http://yutaka.it-n.jp/lim2/720990001.html, but there is only one subspecies - cocutus. In Viet Nam I vno other-look in http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/papilionoidea/nymphalidae/limenitidinae/tanaecia/index.html. I didn't define the subspecies.
Try logging in to http://www.vncreatures.net/e_hinhanh.php?loai=3 page 26 or transfer to Tanaecia cocytus
Ladies and gentlemen, friends, comrades. Boris Stradomsky had a stroke. The left half of the body is paralyzed. To everyone who knows him, I ask you to support the man morally. His email: bvstr@mail.ru
Well, we'll wait....before morkovkinogo zagovenya (((There is still in the nymphalids poispravlyat data on species is necessary, and in sailboats too.... curators au (((
The label is ancient...at least, Stalin's times. And there were no identification guides. It is necessary to review the rest of the photos with Attacus identification). All my Atlases have an upper small transparent eye, but doherty does not always have one, lorquinii does not have one (I'm talking about the most common species)
Regarding the morphs: Patrick Blandin lists it as a separate species: Morpho (Morpho) granadensis C. Felder & R. Felder, 1867 1. M. granadensis granadensis C. Felder & R. Felder, 1867 2. M. granadensis polybaptus Butler, 1875 3. M. granadensis lycanor Fruhstorfer, 1907 http://www.patrickblandin.com/fr/zooms/15-checklist-du-genre-morpho-fabricius-1807
They write that they are very similar, but differ only in two black dots on the upper wings. Then, most likely, I have Amanda, the truth is worn out http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=75318
Andrey. Who defined it? Amanda - на Борнео(http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/80_BOMBYCOIDEA/07_SPHINGIDAE/framepage%20Sphingidae.html) Most likely, it is Callambulyx rubricosa (Walker, 1856), and it will have a wider range. http://www.vietnaminsect.com/search/label/Sphingidae
Alexander, if you have already taken it, then combine, pliz, A. neptunus and L. neptunus, and the same with A. and L. rhodifer. It is the same with B. Laos. And it would be better to drive them into Atrophaneura, as it is done with Papilio .And then I'll write down what else needs to be corrected with sailboats - after all, the most popular group)
Comment on the species Byasa adamsoni (deleted from the database 13.03.2017 12:45): Byasa adamsoni is a synonym for Atrophaneura adamsoni. Combine them! How much can you write about the classification of sailboats!(((
I would say that this is Stichophthalma mathilda, Janet, 1905, or S. louisa mathilda, as in our catalog, I have about ten pieces from Viet Nam. and China, but none of them has white on the upper wings, and the black spots on the rear ones are much more powerful. Put it in undetermined places for the appearance of the underside.
Alexander. I've been working on this issue for a while, after the pseudo-Menestheus was sent to me. In general, it is very difficult to distinguish between the subspecies Lorm. lorm. and M. This is best shown in http://insectnet.proboards.com/thread/4035. Briefly: in M., the lower light spot on the median cell of the upper wings is larger and has the appearance of a small heart. The oval light ...
The fact is that Menesteus is a rare species, and Lormieri is the most common, and costs 1-2 pupaars, so the Africans give it out for Menesteus. And the species are really similar. But your name is Lormieri. I would put it and both Stycopalm at least in inaccurately defined ones, so as not to worsen the inaccuracies of the catalog.
How can you be sure that this is not a banal Lormieri? I have about a dozen of them, exactly the same! and one was sent as a Menestheus. It turned out to be Lormieri (((
Can you give me an underside? In shic.sometimes it's the only way to tell. By k-vu and rasp. glazkov. This one also looks more like Louise.
Well, no, 99% of it is Sh. louisa, although I won't say the subspecies, look at it http://stichophthalma.simdif.com/missing-species.html " there's only one pair of fruhstorferi, and you probably bought this one from Lig, so he probably determines how he likes them. If from Viet Nam, it was most likely purchased from vietnaminsects. I bought it myself more than once, but it doesn't detect it.