Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20... 80
So I had them lying like Cossus sp. two years. Well, I didn't want to ship them to C. cossus)))
There is also M. orientalis, which differs in small details of the structure of the legs from below, according to the photo it is unrealistic. But renardi is more common, so I put it this way, but the accuracy is alas ...
Corrected data. Coleoptera / Confidently identified / Imago / Yuri Semejkin → Maladera renardi / Tentatively identified / Male / Evgeny Komarov.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Coleoptera / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin → Maladera renardi / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.
Here it is especially clear that Furcula! Both the proportions and the pathetic but recognizable fragments of the drawing. Alexander well done!
^)))))!! Exactly the same!
So it seemed to me that this is not Lymantriinae, but I didn't dare.
Yes, I have no options, just all the pictures (including yours, output - http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/41695) and my ex. males in the collection have nothing in common, even taking into account the obliteration of this, do not have. That's all I'm talking about.
Yuri, the males of mathura aurora do not have a clearly defined light marginal border on the front wings, as in your specimen, and so on ...
Corrected data. Dolbina tancrei / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov → Kentrochrysalis streckeri / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.
Here is my specimen from Anisimovka http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/59680 . I tend to dichela, not taking into account the "more bold burgundy line", but it seems to me that the "weak" angle of this line on the rear wings is more significant (compared with http://molbiol.ru/forums/uploads/a003/b085/post-26523-1355326687.jpg ). In the same place, just above paralis ...
Everything is correct here! This species is clearly distinguishable externally. The gap between the discal and apical spots is almost 100% a sign.
This species is identified correctly.
Corrected data. Geometridae / Evgeny Komarov → Comostola subtiliaria / Yuri Semejkin.
Corrected data. Geometridae / Evgeny Komarov → Comostola subtiliaria / Yuri Semejkin.
Corrected data. Geometridae / Evgeny Komarov → Comostola subtiliaria / Yuri Semejkin.
Corrected data. Tentatively identified / Vladimir Bobow → Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Acontia trabealis / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.
Yuri, now everything is clear - everything is visible in the second picture! The matter is settled!
Yuri! Are there any basis for accurately identifying this specimen? I don't see in the picture any obvious characteristics that allow to distinguish it from 3-4 relative specimens.
Corrected data. Lycidae / Yuri Semejkin → Lycostomus porphyrophorus / Evgeny Komarov.
This genus must finally be transferred to Coccinellidae!!! Right here http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/979841
Corrected data. Acanthosoma → Acanthosoma labiduroides.
Corrected data. Acanthosoma → Acanthosoma labiduroides.
Corrected data. Apoderus carbonicolor Dalla Torre & Voss, 1930 → Apoderus (Leptapoderus) carbonicolor Dalla Torre & Voss, 1930.
On DV ssp.dubia(Fabricius, 1781).
This species, as far as I understand, is now considered as a synonym of javanus Guérin-Méneville, 1841, and individuals from Russia, China, and Korea as javanus ssp. decoratus Reitter, 1879. The specific name luniferus is not even included in the Catalog of Palaearctic Coleoptera-Volume 4, 2007 https://www.zin.ru/animalia/coleoptera/rus/elateind.htm. So far, I'm leaving it on the DV Identifier ...
Right here http://www.dslib.net/bio-resursy/zhuki-mertvoedy-kozheedy-centralnogo-predkavkazja-fauna-jekologija.html On this point: "Some authors (Shchegoleva-Barovskaya, 1933; Hlisnikovsky, 1964; Lafer, 1989) adhere to the point of view of Semenov-Tyan-Shansky (1926), who distinguished the subgenus Acanthopsilus Port. from a nominative genus to a separate genus. However, it is more appropriate to ...
Yuri! It is only found in the genus AcanthopsilusPort. with the caveat that it is often considered in the genus N e crophorus.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Halyzia sedecimguttata / Irina Nikulina → Vibidia duodecimguttata / Ivan Tislenko.
Same story. Right.
Absolutely right!
Corrected data. Halyzia sedecimguttata / Evgeny Komarov → Vibidia duodecimguttata / Ivan Tislenko.
Corrected data. Nicrophorus humator / Tentatively identified → Nicrophorus concolor / Confidently identified.
Corrected data. Confidently identified → Tentatively identified.
If we believe the DV Insect Identifier, this species is not found in Primorye, but the similar and unique black seaside species Nicrophorus tenuipes (Lewis, 1887) differs precisely in the unicolored brown club of the antennae. Here the mace is typical for humator. ???
Corrected data. Pterostichus interruptus (Dejean, 1828 → (Dejean, 1828).
Corrected data. Xestagonum nazarovi (Lafer, 1976 → (Lafer, 1976).
So I didn't post all the captured species :) Why upload if there are already a dozen good pictures from the same places on the website. But you can estimate approximately of course. In general, Noctuoidea has 135 species, and specifically Noctuidae - 62. This year I have not posted practically any of them.
Of course not, Yuri! I didn't send him one picture at a time. plus external variability, plus I don't know very well myself :) It is necessary to calculate how many types of Noctuidae from Primorye I took a photo of. I know that I have illustrated 2099 species on the website so far, but how many of them are a Noctuidae...
Corrected data. Evgeny Komarov → Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Evgeny Komarov → Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Euromoia subpulchra → Euromoia mixta.
When I uploaded a one and a half hundred of Noctuidae for Matov, I was uncritical,and he just made a slip. I asked him once again.I'm correcting it now.
Corrected data. Euromoia mixta → Euromoia subpulchra.
I'll do it, Yuri!
Yuri, it seemed to me that I had already answered this question but I couldn't find my answer. So, I repeat here. I write Identification precision of these photos as confidently because almost all the specimens shot in Barabash-Levada were caught and defined in labs. In addition, a couple dozen of Kirinia were collected there that day - all identified as epaminondas.
Corrected data. Chrysozephyrus smaragdinus → Neozephyrus smaragdinus.
News
- 24.11.2024: «Поиск энтомологов» работает в полном объеме!
- 24.11.2024: We fixed an error in displaying the website in the "gray" color scheme
- 17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
New photos (25.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 22:47, V. Kolesnikov: Похожа на Orthetrum cancellatum (по...
- 22:21, P. Khramov: Ранее раздел Поиск энтомологов толь...
- 21:25, P. Khramov: Registered users of Insecta.pro can...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Entomological seminar in Moscow on November 13
- Streets: insects names
- A. Gordon, O. Gorbunov, V. Murzin on Russian TV in 2004
- Male secrets: coremata, penis, phalloblaster and... alcohol
