Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Suppose, identified. :)
IMHO, Acronicta rumicis.
Melitaea didyma.
Chalk mountains do mean sooner Z. purpuralis. Was there thyme?
Hm, some technical bug, maybe. Yu. A. Chistyakov could hardly identified it like this. Imho, this is some Arctiidae. (Just for the record, there is no A. statices in Primorye region at all).
Probably, Z. loti.
How come two shots are dated the same day, 2008/6/18 and 2008/6/18, but made in different places, Voronezh region, Pavlovsky hood, Petrovka village neighborhood, Shypov forest, and Vladimir region, Krasny Mayak forestry? What's true? These shots seem to be of the same caterpillar.
Not minos. Probably, Z. loti.
Not minos. May be Z. loti.
Not trifolii. ?Z. viciae.
Not trifolii. ?Z. viciae.
There is no trifolii In Russia accorded to Synev-Efetov. This might be Z. lonicerae.
There is no trifolii in Russia, according by Synev-Efetov. Seems to be Z. lonicerae.
Think, this is B. ino too.
Hm, doubt my own identification... :) Sorry... Rather B. ino.
A. ilia.
A. ilia.
L. reducta.
This species is identified correctly.
IMHO N. xanthomelas.
IMHO N. xanthomelas. Definitely not aglaia since it's willow tree.
IMHO B. ino.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
B. daphne.
M. athalia.
B. dia.
B. dia.
A. adippe.
Summing up: according to the actual info (Synev catalogue; Identifier or insects of Russian Far East), in Russia andetria lives. By the way, in Japan it doesn't (there pryeri lives, and basically pryeri is more southern species). Don't know if both species live somewhere sympatrically (generally can guess, yes). Have nothing more to add. :)
Good! I've asked just in case... :)
P. napi.
Why not (e. g.) britomartis? Checked it out?
I. podalirius! Some technical bug may have happened. And moved podalirinus to Sochi, omg. :)
P. amandus.
IMHO, selene. :)
IMHO, euphrosyne.
This species is identified correctly.
If so, then it's just impossible to identify two of these to the species rather sure, I think.
This species is identified correctly.
It's allright... :) pryeri is the previous (wrong) name of andetria. Look through Synev catalogue.
IMHO Neptis andetria.
IMHO Ussuriana michaelis.
Polygonia c-aureum.
Polygonia c-aureum.
Th. lineola.
Imho, this is just a guesswork. :) Is there any point to compare their stripes if we're not sure that its some diagnostic feature? We should have a look at their genitalia... :) One pro for lutea is that (as I found) adusta was found only on the very edge of the southern Primorye (Hasansky hood). "Veggies" are also interesting question as for these butterflies. This can be a good clue to identify!
Hm... Don't know. Thought, this depends on color rendering. Maybe this is some individual feature. I have never been in the Primorye region and never seen this butterfly alive, so let's residents say something. :) Also this is harder, because there is J. adusta (another name is onoi) in the very South Primorye. Their appearances differ rather slightly. Anyway, they feed on different plants, so ...
As for today info, there is no adippe in Primorye region now (but closer species). Anyway, this butterfly is not adippe's relative. The more I look at it, the more I see ruslana.
Not argiolus since it's Primorye region. Can't surely name the species. :)
News
- 17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
- 11.11.2024: The Community/Forum section has become more convenient
- 11.11.2024: Improved scaling of images in the Forum/Community
New photos (21.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 22:20, P. Khramov: Lampyridae / Tentatively identified...
- 21:35, A. M.: Sure. It's done. (Sorry to say I ha...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Entomological seminar in Moscow on November 13
- Meantime in Japan
- Meanwhile, in Kotelnich
- Butterflies and music: The Bird and the Butterfly, Morning Prayer
