Insecta.pro Community

04.07.2011 14:46, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9534

P. rapae & P. napi.

30.06.2011 19:58, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9539

Boiled? (Judging by what's seen on this photo I'd stake on athalia, but it's a guesswork anyway...)

30.06.2011 1:50, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9514

This species is identified correctly.

30.06.2011 1:49, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9494

Not semiargus. Rather amandus.

24.06.2011 23:16, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9442

L. tityrus.

22.06.2011 1:50, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9414

O. sylvanus.

22.06.2011 1:50, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9409

This species is identified correctly.

17.06.2011 1:21, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9357

If the same, then yes. :)

13.06.2011 16:36, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9357

IMHO, euphrosyne.

13.06.2011 16:35, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9285

Satyrium pruni.

13.06.2011 16:34, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9312

L. phlaeas.

13.06.2011 16:32, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9356

euphrosyne.

13.06.2011 16:31, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9255

This species is identified correctly.

03.06.2011 1:09, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9199

Seems to be N. abdominalis (not sure).

02.06.2011 1:09, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9236

L. tityrus.

02.06.2011 1:07, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9213

Yep.

02.06.2011 1:05, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9204

Ja, ja-ja!

02.06.2011 1:05, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9212

Ja.

02.06.2011 1:05, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9200

Probably, N. abdominalis.

28.05.2011 0:04, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9168

P. rapae.

11.05.2011 0:20, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9094

Ahlbergia frivaldszkyi.

06.05.2011 18:17, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9076

Igor, would you please be more attentive to labels? Don't mind tityrus in Berminvody, but the 30th of November!

05.05.2011 17:10, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9062

IMHO B. daphne.

27.04.2011 1:18, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #5796

Imho, looks rather ilia indeed. Not fully sure though.

27.04.2011 1:12, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9030

P. icarus.

27.04.2011 1:12, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9027

P. icarus.

27.04.2011 1:12, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9023

E. argiades.

27.04.2011 1:12, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9024

E. argiades.

27.04.2011 1:12, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9025

E. argiades. Surely. :)

27.04.2011 1:08, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #2509

This is certainly levana (provided that it was shot in Europe). :) There are antennas on its head, what io doesn't have.

12.04.2011 23:53, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8190

What's not exact there... (mechanical voice) There everything is exact! ;)

12.04.2011 23:50, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8379

Probably. Not 100% sure. Let's wait for Zygaena experts' opinions. :)

12.04.2011 23:48, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8520

Not argus. Most probably P. idas. There is idas checked by genitalia nearby this shot location.

12.04.2011 23:46, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8522

This species is identified correctly.

12.04.2011 23:45, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8521

This species is identified correctly.

12.04.2011 1:36, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8379

Don't know for sure.

12.04.2011 1:33, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8159

IMHO C. flocciferus.

12.04.2011 1:27, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8166

C. flocciferus.

12.04.2011 1:23, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8190

O. sylvanus (male).

12.04.2011 1:22, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8178

C. palaemon.

10.04.2011 23:34, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8378

Z. filipendulae.

05.04.2011 19:17, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8282

I met it even at the end of September, in Crimea (rather worn-out), but November, imho, unbelievable.

05.04.2011 1:32, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8279

Igor, would you please say something about this butterfly? Where and who caught it, to what collection and so on.

05.04.2011 1:29, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8279

Even if it was pirithous on the photo, there still would be huge doubts about label, Imho...

05.04.2011 1:27, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8279

Hey, we're not identifying it as "what do we have similar in Europe?" ;)) The label was definitely mistaken.

05.04.2011 0:53, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8282

30th of November??? No way.

05.04.2011 0:50, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8279

Imho, this is not miracle at all, just mistaken labels (sorry to the author...). It's not pirithous. Either not Leptotes.

31.03.2011 1:46, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8271

Yeah, I can see the photo was originally not good. Sorry and sorry once more for such unreasonable harassment. :)

30.03.2011 23:13, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8271

I mean large size. Think, Evgeny is right. This noise "rainbow" around antennas was just so glaring... Even though it's Apatura. ;)

30.03.2011 20:24, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8271

And I'm like a broken record... :) Petr (and Roman), I want to ask if this visual "noise" around antennas was in original shot or as a result of retouching? If last, put this retouching software to the garbage bin...

Argyrophana caspia Semenov, 1910

Tenebrionidae

Pterostichus dulcis (Bat., 1883)

Carabidae

Doleschallia polibete (Cramer, [1779])

Nymphalidae

Bombus laesus Morawitz, 1875

Apidae

Microdera gracilis Eschscholtz, 1831

Tenebrionidae