Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334... 497
This second generation, collection of mid-July 2014, however)) We still have nothing. Rain, cold and disgusting ((( Here are last year's collections, and delivers that did not have time to deliver. Tropical tired at the moment, and until the winter of the soul is not one of them is.
Vladimir, how to understand this: "individuals may have different" ? These pictures in the group did not one and the same butterfly? Unleashes a group or not? The fact that the group of pictures should be only one and the same individual. And I have been doing online correction groups. Hence the questions.
Variability, however))) It's like a collection, if it is possible to assemble a series, then one copy. terms should never be limited)) Example of a three-day-old: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/39878 They are different. Same thing with orthoses.
Date and geography taken from stoprotsentogo double this picture, which has been deleted. Earlier it looked as: 1914 -04-00 00:00:00; Serbia, Vojvodina, Srem district I think this is the most logical. In 1914, still did not know exactly what makrofotogratsiya, the more color and even more in the digital version)))
Corrected data. 1914-04-00 00:00:00 → 2014-04-13 21:00:00.
Corrected data.
There is also one instance think in terms not do))
Well, good luck in breeding. I wish to receive a female :)
Alexander, don't forget about photo groups. Join the photos...
Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #39933 group.
Corrected data. Not identified → Alcides liris / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
Corrected data. Not identified → Alcides liris / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
There is plenty of it in the web. I'll add new species to the our database and move the photo there.
Now it is clear, Alexander :) Repetitions "Rake" is simply afraid. Still worth the goose to take the excretion: already "afraid" of their own ..... P.S. Now I will look with chitin platform. I really want to get a female and one male fly to the light, and it occasionally. And there is not a single female, and it is a big and beautiful)
Why is that? Caterpillars of both species other than the appearance of more and absolutely identical conditions of existence, as it turns out recently.
Andrew, the caterpillar is collected on the removal? How confident that this is it? I ask in order to anticipate the possible "rake" (lopuhnulsya himself this way in the fall). Just I was not sure yet received the imago: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/34067
Well, they can also say "family": belong to the subfamily Parnassiinae :) Eugene, I have a request: please do not ignore filling in the fields "The date and time of shooting / fishing" This information is needed, and at times vital)))
Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #23676 group.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Female → Male.
Corrected data. Imago → Female.
Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #23674 group.
Corrected data. Imago → Female.
Corrected data. Imago → Female.
Corrected data. Imago → Female.
Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 35—40 mm. Flight time: No formalized data → April, May.
Corrected data. Andrey Ponomarev → Vlad Proklov.
Another example of intraspecific variation when it is necessary to set a series (limited to 3 copies.), Collected at one time and in one place.
Strange transfer flew ((
Corrected data. Vasiliy Feoktistov → Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Vasiliy Feoktistov → Alexandr Zhakov.
To me at all if only it came and everything. But straight home to the balcony :) Generally quite rare for us and I think I have it on, even in some QC seen (do not remember exactly) ....
Corrected data. Not identified → Cyrestis cocles / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
Corrected data. Not identified → Cyrestis cocles / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
Alexander, a subspecies of himself write in LC. It must be so: ssp. floresiana Fruhstorfer, 1902
Corrected data. Not identified → Cethosia tambora / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
Corrected data. Not identified → Cethosia tambora / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
I can not find where to add the form: some "trading" sources and Wikipedia (((Here in my many incomprehensible.
But volatility. Tomorrow even throw in a few orthoses (Gothic will no longer ship: enough). According to the old collections just decided to go :)
Solved the problem: find the neighborhood has a certain top))) Lord, I beseech you: contact me, please do so immediately in a group do not have to wander here so .... The assumption was right. Only the Americans she Archaeoprepona, however: http://butterfliesofamerica.com/L/archaeoprepona_c_chromus.htm
Corrected data. Not identified → Noreppa chromus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #36395 group.
Archaeoprepona chromus (Guérin-Méneville, [1844]) ?? Where is the top?
Corrected data. Not identified → Parantica cleona / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
Corrected data. Not identified → Parantica cleona / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
Corrected data. Vasiliy Feoktistov → Khalaim Yevgeniy.
Corrected data. Vasiliy Feoktistov → Khalaim Yevgeniy.
Corrected data.
Corrected data.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
News
- 12.10.2024: Fixed sorting/ordering errors (Gallery and Catalog sections)
- 10.10.2024: We fixed bad situation with photo captions for insect species that are not yet in the website database
- 31.08.2024: Первые итоги интеграции/переноса/дублирования Молбиола и Инсекты
New photos (13.10.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 17:48, P. Khramov: In some cases, sorting/ordering in ...
- 17:43, P. Khramov: Comments that concerned incorrect p...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Meantime in Japan
- The insects exhibition in Kotlas
- A. Gordon, O. Gorbunov, V. Murzin on Russian TV in 2004
- Notes about Phuket Butterfly Garden, Thailand
