Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334... 497

01.05.2015 21:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39942

This second generation, collection of mid-July 2014, however)) We still have nothing. Rain, cold and disgusting ((( Here are last year's collections, and delivers that did not have time to deliver. Tropical tired at the moment, and until the winter of the soul is not one of them is.

01.05.2015 20:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39940

Vladimir, how to understand this: "individuals may have different" ? These pictures in the group did not one and the same butterfly? Unleashes a group or not? The fact that the group of pictures should be only one and the same individual. And I have been doing online correction groups. Hence the questions.

01.05.2015 10:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39937

Variability, however))) It's like a collection, if it is possible to assemble a series, then one copy. terms should never be limited)) Example of a three-day-old: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/39878 They are different. Same thing with orthoses.

01.05.2015 7:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28802

Date and geography taken from stoprotsentogo double this picture, which has been deleted. Earlier it looked as: 1914 -04-00 00:00:00; Serbia, Vojvodina, Srem district I think this is the most logical. In 1914, still did not know exactly what makrofotogratsiya, the more color and even more in the digital version)))

01.05.2015 7:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28802

Corrected data. 1914-04-00 00:00:00 → 2014-04-13 21:00:00.

01.05.2015 7:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28802

Corrected data.

30.04.2015 23:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39937

There is also one instance think in terms not do))

30.04.2015 21:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39906

Well, good luck in breeding. I wish to receive a female :)

30.04.2015 20:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39933

Alexander, don't forget about photo groups. Join the photos...

30.04.2015 20:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39934

Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #39933 group.

30.04.2015 20:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39934

Corrected data. Not identified → Alcides liris / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

30.04.2015 20:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39933

Corrected data. Not identified → Alcides liris / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

30.04.2015 19:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39933

There is plenty of it in the web. I'll add new species to the our database and move the photo there.

30.04.2015 19:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39906

Now it is clear, Alexander :) Repetitions "Rake" is simply afraid. Still worth the goose to take the excretion: already "afraid" of their own ..... P.S. Now I will look with chitin platform. I really want to get a female and one male fly to the light, and it occasionally. And there is not a single female, and it is a big and beautiful)

30.04.2015 18:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39906

Why is that? Caterpillars of both species other than the appearance of more and absolutely identical conditions of existence, as it turns out recently.

30.04.2015 17:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39906

Andrew, the caterpillar is collected on the removal? How confident that this is it? I ask in order to anticipate the possible "rake" (lopuhnulsya himself this way in the fall). Just I was not sure yet received the imago: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/34067

30.04.2015 13:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39904

Well, they can also say "family": belong to the subfamily Parnassiinae :) Eugene, I have a request: please do not ignore filling in the fields "The date and time of shooting / fishing" This information is needed, and at times vital)))

30.04.2015 7:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #23677

Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #23676 group.

30.04.2015 7:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #23677

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

30.04.2015 7:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #23676

Corrected data. Female → Male.

30.04.2015 7:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #23676

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

30.04.2015 7:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #23675

Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #23674 group.

30.04.2015 7:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #23675

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

30.04.2015 7:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #23674

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

30.04.2015 7:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #36207

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

30.04.2015 6:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Cleora cinctaria

Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 35—40 mm. Flight time: No formalized data → April, May.

29.04.2015 20:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5132

Corrected data. Andrey Ponomarev → Vlad Proklov.

29.04.2015 20:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39887

Another example of intraspecific variation when it is necessary to set a series (limited to 3 copies.), Collected at one time and in one place.

29.04.2015 15:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #26926

Strange transfer flew ((

29.04.2015 15:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #26926

Corrected data. Vasiliy Feoktistov → Alexandr Zhakov.

29.04.2015 15:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #26927

Corrected data. Vasiliy Feoktistov → Alexandr Zhakov.

29.04.2015 13:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21496

To me at all if only it came and everything. But straight home to the balcony :) Generally quite rare for us and I think I have it on, even in some QC seen (do not remember exactly) ....

29.04.2015 9:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39006

Corrected data. Not identified → Cyrestis cocles / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

29.04.2015 8:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39005

Corrected data. Not identified → Cyrestis cocles / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

28.04.2015 22:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39859

Alexander, a subspecies of himself write in LC. It must be so: ssp. floresiana Fruhstorfer, 1902

28.04.2015 22:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39860

Corrected data. Not identified → Cethosia tambora / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

28.04.2015 22:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39859

Corrected data. Not identified → Cethosia tambora / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

28.04.2015 21:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39859

I can not find where to add the form: some "trading" sources and Wikipedia (((Here in my many incomprehensible.

28.04.2015 20:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39849

But volatility. Tomorrow even throw in a few orthoses (Gothic will no longer ship: enough). According to the old collections just decided to go :)

28.04.2015 16:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #36396

Solved the problem: find the neighborhood has a certain top))) Lord, I beseech you: contact me, please do so immediately in a group do not have to wander here so .... The assumption was right. Only the Americans she Archaeoprepona, however: http://butterfliesofamerica.com/L/archaeoprepona_c_chromus.htm

28.04.2015 16:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #36396

Corrected data. Not identified → Noreppa chromus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

28.04.2015 16:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #36396

Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #36395 group.

28.04.2015 11:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #36396

Archaeoprepona chromus (Guérin-Méneville, [1844]) ?? Where is the top?