Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337... 497

22.04.2015 13:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39766

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

22.04.2015 13:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39769

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

22.04.2015 13:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39768

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

22.04.2015 13:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39768

Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #39769 group.

22.04.2015 13:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39766

Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #39767 group.

22.04.2015 13:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39763

Corrected data.

22.04.2015 13:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39762

Corrected data.

22.04.2015 13:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39765

Corrected data.

22.04.2015 13:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39764

Corrected data.

22.04.2015 13:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39764

Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #39765 group.

22.04.2015 13:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39763

Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #39762 group.

22.04.2015 13:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39759

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

22.04.2015 13:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39758

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

22.04.2015 13:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39761

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

22.04.2015 13:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39760

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

22.04.2015 13:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39760

Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #39761 group.

22.04.2015 13:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39758

Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #39759 group.

22.04.2015 10:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #32748

Corrected data. Euphydryas ichnea / Irina Nikulina → Euphydryas davidi / Evgeny Komarov.

21.04.2015 19:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39754

Corrected data. Not identified → Pyrgus malvae / Confidently identified / Igor Sakhno.

19.04.2015 15:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #22341

I stumbled on this picture :) This is not entirely natural rastsvetochka. She's very self-colored :) These red spots - meconium , which highlights the butterfly after birth.An interesting quote: "Upon emerging from the pupa, with wings still wet, young Belyanko pushed out of his bowel curious few drops of red liquid - meconium: the remains of an old meal of small caterpillars.Produced ...

19.04.2015 13:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39175

Corrected data. Not identified → Pareronia tritaea / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

19.04.2015 13:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39174

Corrected data. Not identified → Pareronia tritaea / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

19.04.2015 12:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39188

Euploea eleusina? Won't take a risk to move it to the species.

19.04.2015 11:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39079

Well, of course :) It is simply an analogy, I spent (about swallowtail).

19.04.2015 10:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39079

Well I will add ssp. :))) Just rationality in it do not see, why duplicate the specific name of ... Then it is necessary and suburban Swallowtail as a sign of Papilio machaon machaon Linnaeus, 1758))))

19.04.2015 10:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39079

Nominate subspecies (the name of the type described above), and there is no neobzhodimosti. It looks like Papilio iswara iswara White, 1842 because the name of the species Papilio iswara White, 1842 Especially for the underside was not written anything on this line. There nominative, as far as I know. Near the site is from there and I can put a couple more and sign on the top line. But why ...

19.04.2015 9:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39079

Corrected data.

18.04.2015 11:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #38551

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

18.04.2015 11:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #38550

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

18.04.2015 11:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39173

Corrected data. Not identified → Ideopsis vitrea / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

18.04.2015 11:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39172

Corrected data. Not identified → Ideopsis vitrea / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

18.04.2015 11:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39172

This species is identified correctly.

18.04.2015 11:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39183

Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #39182 group.

18.04.2015 11:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39185

Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #39184 group.

18.04.2015 11:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39185

Corrected data. The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

18.04.2015 11:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39183

Corrected data. The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

18.04.2015 11:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39182

Corrected data. The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

18.04.2015 11:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39184

Corrected data. The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

18.04.2015 11:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39055

Amesia sp.

18.04.2015 11:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39196

Vindula sp.

18.04.2015 10:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Cadphises maculata

Peter, here it is necessary to change the first source for № [137] on the № [36] Natural History Museum (nhm.ac.uk), 2011 Entangled in them trite when creating views. I tried to identify the problem a separate topic.

18.04.2015 9:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Cadphises maculata

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.

18.04.2015 9:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #38414

Corrected data. Not identified → Cadphises maculata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.04.2015 9:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #38414

And call it perfection Cadphises maculata Moore, 1865 :))) Now loans. The underside is a pity there is no (((

17.04.2015 23:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39730

I do not mind the second gallery. Put-because there is no other picture there. "To the point" so to speak ((( Here to help arhivchik where the wind is blowing: http://rghost.ru/7jvQ89PkS (there are 4 of my photos with a brief explanation). For a long time I place the monitor and there will not be any cabbage (((