Insecta.pro Community

15.04.2014 6:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28572

The issue is quite controversial because the author's comments to the photo clearly says: "The definition of the form Vlad Proklov" Alexander, there should first figure out how Ivan was determined after the butterfly and stand definition. Oh, what, and in determining the Micra near Moscow, I personally believe in the definition of Vlad.

15.04.2014 4:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28574

Corrected data. Not identified → Ypthima argus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

14.04.2014 20:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28541

An interesting scheme, but want drbavit: highlight the need to at least three sides and not take a flashlight: this is not serious for large, tropical animals who have a wingspan of 15 cm. And above, and 3 lyumki SLR cold, white light. The sheet acts as a lens and distributes the light uniformly along the circumference.An interesting idea, and most importantly simple. Shamil, thank you :)

14.04.2014 19:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28569

Corrected data. Not identified → Eustroma aerosum / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

14.04.2014 19:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28570

Corrected data. Not identified → Leucomelas juvenilis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

14.04.2014 9:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27803

Most likely exit and the date of release. As far as I know Andrew engaged in breeding.

14.04.2014 1:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28561

Corrected data. Not identified → Coenonympha oedippus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

14.04.2014 1:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28560

Corrected data. Not identified → Coenonympha oedippus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

13.04.2014 19:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #26786

In the trunk I do not remember what :) Where it is possible to find almost everything: no difference. This is referred to as fishing occurred: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=526320&view=findpost&p=1403350

13.04.2014 19:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28541

Alexander than kadriruesh? Do not be so cut the "butt". The fields around the perimeter leave more :)

13.04.2014 17:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28554

Corrected data. Not identified → Favonius taxila / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.04.2014 20:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #26225

Corrected data. Not identified → Hyperlais dulcinalis / Confidently identified / Ozgur Kocak.

12.04.2014 20:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #26225

Base: http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Hyperlais_Dulcinalis I stand ...

12.04.2014 20:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #26225

This species is identified correctly.

12.04.2014 15:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #18213

Well: I am having such a magical book of sin on the site keep their own uncertain butterflies :) In your book, but more like a nominative ..... And the network mess with them: http://yutaka.it-n.jp/lim2/721250010.html http://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/#!/sp/676/Euthalia-monina

12.04.2014 8:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21240

Paramaxates spinivesica? Paramaxates taiwana Yazaki, 1988 in my opinion is no longer because of geography: a new look and distributing for him at the moment was not only Taiwan, and Thailand is written here. I can not stand long, and stand up for discussion :)

11.04.2014 21:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28514

Now, it is logical to remove from the string "Clarification of classification (subspecies, shape, age). For example, the light shape or larva of the third age" the assumption of the author photo with three question marks :)

11.04.2014 21:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28253

This I pulled her out of the admin does not honor komenty. I do not have time to reset, sorry. As she wrote in the admin was listed below.

11.04.2014 21:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28503

I have not write :)

11.04.2014 21:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28503

Corrected data. Not identified → Orthosia populeti / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

11.04.2014 21:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #18213

Corrected data. Not identified → Euthalia monina / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

11.04.2014 21:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #18213

I agree. A subspecies name: Euthalia monina kesava (Moore, 1859) Svetlana could write in my LC.

11.04.2014 20:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28253

Alexander, when loading photo Russian uninvited write anywhere is not necessary. Due to the fact that it was written "moth-moth tamariksovaya - Amorphogynia necessaria (Zeller, 1849)." Upload it as a vague and horrible for moderation. Who pulled under the Latin part of the name :)

11.04.2014 17:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28511

Corrected data. Not identified → Saturnia pavonia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

11.04.2014 17:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28497

Corrected data. Not identified → Saturnia pavonia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

11.04.2014 17:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28510

Corrected data. Not identified → Acronicta auricoma / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

11.04.2014 17:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28509

Corrected data. Not identified → Acronicta rumicis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

11.04.2014 15:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28512

Corrected data. Not identified → Caligula boisduvalii / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

11.04.2014 13:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28512

Caligula boisduvaliiseems to me, or someone close :)

11.04.2014 13:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28509

Acronicta rumicis ?

11.04.2014 12:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28510

Acronicta auricomalikely. "I'm afraid," I LW and therefore it is necessary that someone confirmed :)

11.04.2014 10:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28497

This is also similar to theSaturnia pavoniaso well as a goose on photo # 28511. Only here the penultimate age, 4th (black warts). What do you think? If there are no other opinions tonight bear both images.

11.04.2014 6:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28511

Saturnia pavonia? Last, 5th age. Only in this age of the caterpillar yellow warts (warts on other age black). Yes, and the blue of the form is there.

10.04.2014 23:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28497

Saturniidae. Now I can not see in the region, but I think that they were not very much and will be determined so easily :)

09.04.2014 22:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #4544

Duc in my opinion they are not necessary. This I did, if there was a question. Logically something: Ptitsekryl correctly on the basis of the generic name :)

09.04.2014 7:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #4544

"Ornithopters" or "Ptitsekrylki" , "Ptitsekryly" have a collective, the popular name for butterflies of three genera Ornithoptera, Trogonoptera and Troides . This tells me passionately unloved "folk" Wikipedia ": http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CE%F0%ED%E8%F2%EE%EF%F2%E5%F0%FB that in my opinion wrong.Subscribe to the proposal of Alexander: I do not have to call all the butterflies of this ...

08.04.2014 21:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28448

Corrected data. Not identified → Euclidia dentata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

08.04.2014 21:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5761

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

08.04.2014 21:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5758

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

08.04.2014 21:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #1010

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

08.04.2014 19:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #16403

Corrected data. Diarsia brunnea / Confidently identified / Vitaly Gumenuk → Not identified.

08.04.2014 19:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #16403

According to the genitals, so the genitals (photo in nature this can not be a self-) ...... "Zeroed" .... sadly :(. Collect collection, gentlemen :)

08.04.2014 16:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28196

Perez similar to the photo # 28450 as being with him in the same group. Accordingly, the name of this determined the same.

08.04.2014 16:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28196

Corrected data. Not identified → Clostera anachoreta / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

08.04.2014 14:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28248

Corrected data. Not identified → Tholera cespitis / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

08.04.2014 14:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28249

Corrected data. Not identified → Tholera cespitis / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

08.04.2014 14:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28250

Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Tholera cespitis / Confidently identified / Larva / Marija Jaunkunga.

08.04.2014 14:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28247

Corrected data. Not identified → Tholera cespitis / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

08.04.2014 14:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28247

This species is identified correctly.

08.04.2014 14:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #22088

Corrected data. Not identified → Rothschildia orizaba / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

Melitaea robertsi Butler, 1880

Nymphalidae

Manduca bergi Rothschild & Jordan, 1903

Sphingidae

Euphoria lurida Fabricius, 1775

Scarabaeidae

Trichopoda pennipes Fabricius, 1781

Tachinidae

Lydella stabulans Meigen, 1824

Tachinidae