Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436... 497
The issue is quite controversial because the author's comments to the photo clearly says: "The definition of the form Vlad Proklov" Alexander, there should first figure out how Ivan was determined after the butterfly and stand definition. Oh, what, and in determining the Micra near Moscow, I personally believe in the definition of Vlad.
Corrected data. Not identified → Ypthima argus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
An interesting scheme, but want drbavit: highlight the need to at least three sides and not take a flashlight: this is not serious for large, tropical animals who have a wingspan of 15 cm. And above, and 3 lyumki SLR cold, white light. The sheet acts as a lens and distributes the light uniformly along the circumference.An interesting idea, and most importantly simple. Shamil, thank you :)
Corrected data. Not identified → Eustroma aerosum / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Leucomelas juvenilis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Most likely exit and the date of release. As far as I know Andrew engaged in breeding.
Corrected data. Not identified → Coenonympha oedippus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Coenonympha oedippus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
In the trunk I do not remember what :) Where it is possible to find almost everything: no difference. This is referred to as fishing occurred: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=526320&view=findpost&p=1403350
Alexander than kadriruesh? Do not be so cut the "butt". The fields around the perimeter leave more :)
Corrected data. Not identified → Favonius taxila / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Hyperlais dulcinalis / Confidently identified / Ozgur Kocak.
Base: http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Hyperlais_Dulcinalis I stand ...
This species is identified correctly.
Well: I am having such a magical book of sin on the site keep their own uncertain butterflies :) In your book, but more like a nominative ..... And the network mess with them: http://yutaka.it-n.jp/lim2/721250010.html http://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/#!/sp/676/Euthalia-monina
Paramaxates spinivesica? Paramaxates taiwana Yazaki, 1988 in my opinion is no longer because of geography: a new look and distributing for him at the moment was not only Taiwan, and Thailand is written here. I can not stand long, and stand up for discussion :)
Now, it is logical to remove from the string "Clarification of classification (subspecies, shape, age). For example, the light shape or larva of the third age" the assumption of the author photo with three question marks :)
This I pulled her out of the admin does not honor komenty. I do not have time to reset, sorry. As she wrote in the admin was listed below.
I have not write :)
Corrected data. Not identified → Orthosia populeti / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Euthalia monina / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
I agree. A subspecies name: Euthalia monina kesava (Moore, 1859) Svetlana could write in my LC.
Alexander, when loading photo Russian uninvited write anywhere is not necessary. Due to the fact that it was written "moth-moth tamariksovaya - Amorphogynia necessaria (Zeller, 1849)." Upload it as a vague and horrible for moderation. Who pulled under the Latin part of the name :)
Corrected data. Not identified → Saturnia pavonia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Saturnia pavonia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Acronicta auricoma / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Acronicta rumicis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Caligula boisduvalii / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Caligula boisduvaliiseems to me, or someone close :)
Acronicta rumicis ?
Acronicta auricomalikely. "I'm afraid," I LW and therefore it is necessary that someone confirmed :)
This is also similar to theSaturnia pavoniaso well as a goose on photo # 28511. Only here the penultimate age, 4th (black warts). What do you think? If there are no other opinions tonight bear both images.
Saturnia pavonia? Last, 5th age. Only in this age of the caterpillar yellow warts (warts on other age black). Yes, and the blue of the form is there.
Saturniidae. Now I can not see in the region, but I think that they were not very much and will be determined so easily :)
Duc in my opinion they are not necessary. This I did, if there was a question. Logically something: Ptitsekryl correctly on the basis of the generic name :)
"Ornithopters" or "Ptitsekrylki" , "Ptitsekryly" have a collective, the popular name for butterflies of three genera Ornithoptera, Trogonoptera and Troides . This tells me passionately unloved "folk" Wikipedia ": http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CE%F0%ED%E8%F2%EE%EF%F2%E5%F0%FB that in my opinion wrong.Subscribe to the proposal of Alexander: I do not have to call all the butterflies of this ...
Corrected data. Not identified → Euclidia dentata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Imago → Female.
Corrected data. Imago → Female.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Diarsia brunnea / Confidently identified / Vitaly Gumenuk → Not identified.
According to the genitals, so the genitals (photo in nature this can not be a self-) ...... "Zeroed" .... sadly :(. Collect collection, gentlemen :)
Perez similar to the photo # 28450 as being with him in the same group. Accordingly, the name of this determined the same.
Corrected data. Not identified → Clostera anachoreta / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Tholera cespitis / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.
Corrected data. Not identified → Tholera cespitis / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Tholera cespitis / Confidently identified / Larva / Marija Jaunkunga.
Corrected data. Not identified → Tholera cespitis / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.
This species is identified correctly.
Corrected data. Not identified → Rothschildia orizaba / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
News
- 31.08.2024: Первые итоги интеграции/переноса/дублирования Молбиола и Инсекты
- 25.08.2024: Further adaptation of the website for mobile devices
- 14.08.2024: Auto applying the properties "taxon", "author of identification", "precision of identification" to all photos in a group when one of the photos is changed
New photos (04.10.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 20:03, P. Khramov: Click an image to enlarge it. Last...
- 22:34, D. Pozhogin: Явно не карандаша. Энейс мулла бол...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Meantime in Japan
- 20th International Insect Fair in Moscow (Russia, October 2023)
- The petition in defense of biological nomenclature
- Deudorix isocrates endamages pomegranate crops in India
