Pages: 1 ...43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51... 497
Corrected data. Callidium sempervirens Linsley 1942 → Callidium (Callidium) sempervirens Linsley 1942.
Corrected data. Callidium pseudotsugae Fisher, 1920 → Callidium (Callidium) pseudotsugae Fisher, 1920.
Corrected data. Callidium powelli Linsley & Chemsak 1963 → Callidium (Callidium) powelli Linsley & Chemsak 1963.
Corrected data. Callidium libani Sama & Rapuzzi, 2002 → Callidium (Callidium) libani Sama & Rapuzzi, 2002.
Corrected data. Callidium leechi Linsley & Chemsak 1963 → Callidium (Callidium) leechi Linsley & Chemsak 1963.
Corrected data. Callidium hengduanum Holzschuh, 1999 → Callidium (Callidium) hengduanum Holzschuh, 1999.
Corrected data. Callidium cicatricosum Mannerheim, 1853 → Callidium (Callidium) cicatricosum Mannerheim, 1853.
Corrected data. Callidium angustipennis Chemsak 1964 → Callidium (Callidium) angustipennis Chemsak 1964.
Corrected data. Callidium violaceum Linnaeus, 1758 → Callidium (Callidium) violaceum Linnaeus, 1758.
Corrected data. Callidium coriaceum Paykull, 1800 → Callidium (Palaeocallidium) coriaceum Paykull, 1800.
Corrected data. Callidium chlorizans Solsky, 1870 → Callidium (Palaeocallidium) chlorizans Solsky, 1870.
At one time, Alexander Rusinov suggested the species affiliation: http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/rus/rusinov.htm Nevertheless, I didn't dare bet on the exact results. Although in my opinion we don't have a lot of options ) Evgeny, what do you say?
UP Peter, the issue has been in place for more than a month. Pull the photo out into the light of day from the additional gallery at last. On the species page, on the right, there are no photos right now (
Corrected data. / Confidently identified / → Artena dotata / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. / Confidently identified / → Artena inversa / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Asota heliconia? Olga, here the date and geography (as, indeed, for your other pictures) certainly do not hurt. I will say more: this data is absolutely necessary. Please put it down if possible.
Shamil, here he specifically indicated the wingspan for a Moscow region female (53 mm.): http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/42184 This year, July 12 (it's a little early for it here) I took another one. This one has a wingspan of 55 mm. Quite a large beast:) And the condition is perfect this year (it is unusual for representatives of the genus, they are usually ragged) ... Unfortunately, I can't ...