Photo #59052: Eilema sp.

15.08.2016 16:18, Alexandr Zhakov

The Dubatolov system is very good, but it has not yet been adopted on a global scale. In order to apply it on this site, it is necessary to audit lichens on a global scale, and not on the territory of Russia and adjacent countries. If you divide the genus Eilema into the genera that Dubatolov suggests, there will be a huge sediment from the species of other regions. Therefore, until there is a revision, there is no point in making new changes.

15.08.2016 15:54, Yuri Semejkin

Yes, probably to Collita. Kol Dubatolov refers here.

15.08.2016 15:39, Alexandr Zhakov Corrected data.

Arctiinae → Eilema.

15.08.2016 14:38, Alexandr Zhakov

Which one? to Eilema or to Collita? :)

15.08.2016 14:26, Yuri Semejkin

And what do we not transfer to the genus ? You can go to the genus.

15.08.2016 13:02, Alexandr Zhakov

Yes, I looked at the site http://szmn.eco.nsc.ru/Lithosiinae/Lithosiinaelist.html Dubatolova, he refers these species to the genus Collita Moore, 1878, and you have three species there that differ only in the gene.

15.08.2016 12:10, Yuri Semejkin

Alexander! I don't have a source describing Arctiinae.So I will not object, besides it is not clear what color the rear. krl. The view is given on the basis of images of the Internet. More specifically, it's like the shape of a butterfly (its outline) so is the direction of the veins appearing through the wings going from top to bottom and from the right, to the left.

15.08.2016 11:46, Alexandr Zhakov

Yuri, you have several types, if I'm not mistaken, that are genital.

31.07.2016 8:02, Yuri Semejkin

Eilema griseola (Hubner, 1803)