Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Is not the female?
I wonder whether it is possible to create a caterpillar and chrysalis artificial conditions to get a color uniform?
Then there were only dandelions, and the beast was sluggish, more on what did not want to stay.
On pupae look like
Well ... leafhopper (nymph, probably)
Protaetia (Liocola) marmorata
Protaetia (Liocola) marmorata
For some reason it does not want to ride in Cylindera arenaria
pentatoma rufipes ?
Maybe, after all, ksantomelas?
Of all similar approaches more this species, although it is not sure of its range.
The rare case when the caterpillar and butterfly are alike!
May be I do not know. But she kept taking off and sit on it alone, although there is a lot of that circle grew.
Especially because I fotkal material commercial exhibition, and they were not up to the label.
Something herbaceous, I do not know. And judging by the impression the folded abdomen, she eggs are laid, the eggs themselves but I have not seen.
Big doubts about the definition.
His doubts are not accidentally wrote under that photo.
Ah, well then so ;-)
I noticed that his head of yellow, while fastselly, like, black.
I guess it's all the same Nemophora prodigellus?
In general, in Russia today do not forward. Perhaps only a convenient opportunity.
Yes, send us right now is problematic. Rather, all this nonsense would be dissolved. I can not imagine pyri 20 cm. This is - in the classically straightened form?
Alexander I had also thought that all weighty - female. Here are this year hatched ones I 1st age exactly the same feed. The greatest cocoon - 6.5 cm appeared cocoon of luxury male.Females hatched also rather big, but at least a few millimeters, they were smaller than the male, and this was almost the same size of the front wing with other males. And last year, all three females were somehow much ...
And how do you define on a caterpillar, it is the female?
I found this picture in my zagashnikah - threw itself as something interesting (where, incidentally, on the upper wings of the sling is not enough). Author - Vitaly. If it is lost from the site, I can send it. How to decide?
Semiargus (just guessing).
Maybe just Malvaceae?
So the top of it, and will not be removed, except that only at the time of marriage dancers.
There would be more in the future, only those museums ...
Yes, we must try. Thanks for the consultation!
And how did you attach any raspravilke glass, bent pins?
Thank you very much for the information! I'll be experimenting (obviously not on oleander).
I can identify them only two or three days before the imago as through a skin begins to show through picture and begins to show a spot on the male end of the abdomen (where the female is not).
Yes, I'm on your tip and reflexes.
Great! That is, it may be an ordinary lamp, or it is necessary to heat a small fan to direct heat flux?
And he at you so quickly dried up (in the sense - hardened)?
I have information that the oleander in captivity bad eating privet (and crumble it in the fall of one of the latter).
And I, judging by the state, will be released tomorrow. All females like.
Perhaps, then - less can be removed.
It is not clear that it could happen. Well, underdeveloped wings and proboscis not spun - it happens, but on it is almost no "hair"!
Not born beautiful ...
I tried to catch two in the field, but no! Only the more distant photo of something clears up, but of course, without details. I can, by the way, and it lay.
Determined Andrew Komrakov