Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77... 80
Petr, thanks! :) If we compare these photos, then this is the very Japonica adusta (Riley, 1939)!
Poorly, adusta is shown in web so bad (found only this): http://molbiol.ru/forums/lofiversion/index.php/t184005.html.
Petr! Alexandr may be right. If Konstantin adds some more photos, that will be good to verify it once more, especially such that are "No comments".
View transferred from generation to generation Deilephila Choerocampa.
Questionable ssp. suellus, Staudinger, 1878: some authors move it to porcellus synonyms, others (e. g., Catalogue of the Lepidoptera of Russia, 2008) consider it as a species itself. Also, the Catalogue says that suellus is expanded in Siberia (Baikal region), so it's a question who can be in Astrakhan region then.
Alexandr! I asked Konstantin for large size photos of questionable Saturnias (these also) to show it to some American expert in American Saturnias. Maybe, that will clear up the situation. Hylesia teratex is doubtful. This is male, and all males of this species, as we can see on other shots, have brown pubescense, not dark black as this one has. Meh, Konstantin should have had possibility to ...
View transferred from generation to generation Callophrys Antigius.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
Fouled up, maybe. Now databased for sure.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
The species is added to the database/approved.
To "uncertain".
The species is added to the database/approved.
To "uncertain". Few are similar also, but this is the best one.
This species is identified correctly.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
Seems just Argynnis paphia. Don't pass as similar one above, Argynnis (Argyronome) ruslana Motschulsky, 1866. Underside needed.
Thecla betulae (Linnaeus, 1758).
That's just a label, I think, in these specimens. problem - at a glance nominative, ie about. Ceram, where occur 90% of imported Russian Ulysses.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
News
- 09.04.2024: Recognition of species/taxa by file names of uploaded photos has become more convenient
- 28.03.2024: We changed timeouts for the author to edit some data for his photos on the website
- 19.03.2024: Insecta.pro and the entomological forum Integration
New photos (26.04.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 18:03, P. Khramov: A nice video from 2004 with Oleg Go...
- 13:02, P. Khramov: Bombus → Bombus sylvestris....
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- A. Gordon, O. Gorbunov, V. Murzin on Russian TV in 2004
- Meanwhile, in Kotelnich
- The petition in defense of biological nomenclature
- Monarch caterpillar removed from a pesticide label
