E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Identification of Hymenoptera (wasps, bees, ants)

Community and ForumInsects identificationIdentification of Hymenoptera (wasps, bees, ants)

Pages: 1 ...171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179... 277

27.10.2015 0:02, AVA

Please help me determine the name of these "bees". Saratov region July


Actually, the bee is only the first-Megachile sp.
The second is the solitary fold-winged wasp Eumenes sp. [Vespidae].
Before the view at such angles and scales, of course, it is hardly possible to determine.

28.10.2015 2:15, Пензуит

 
The second is the solitary fold-winged wasp Eumenes sp. [Vespidae].



And Eumenes Eumenes before the view is determined by photos? Please help, if someone is possible.


1. June

picture: DSCN2553_16.JPG
picture: DSCN2554_17__.JPG
picture: DSCN2562_16.JPG



2. July

picture: DSCN7209_26.JPG
picture: DSCN7210_25.JPG



3. August

picture: DSCN9282_26.JPG



4. August

picture: DSCN0859_16.jpg
picture: DSCN0865_15.jpg



5. September

picture: DSCN2389_16__.JPG
picture: DSCN2391_16.JPG

This post was edited by Penzuit - 28.10.2015 02: 29

28.10.2015 9:12, AVA

And Eumenes Eumenes before the view is determined by photos? Please help, if someone is possible.


Sometimes you can tell. But more often you need to know the pubescence of the temples, propleura, chest and first segments of the abdomen.
When Carcharot looks in, it may react in some way. rolleyes.gif
Likes: 1

28.10.2015 11:56, Кархарот

Most likely, it is E. coarctatus and / or E. pedunculatus. But here even the pubescence of these parts will not help (it is similar for them), you need the pubescence of the last segment of the flagellum and the punctuation of the last sternite in the male and the pubescence of the basins in the female. All this is not visible. In short, we need the instances themselves.
Likes: 1

28.10.2015 12:32, AVA

Most likely, it is E. coarctatus and / or E. pedunculatus. But here even the pubescence of these parts will not help (it is similar for them), you need the pubescence of the last segment of the flagellum and the punctuation of the last sternite in the male and the pubescence of the basins in the female. All this is not visible. In short, we need the instances themselves.


And it also seems to me that Nos. 1-3 are noticeably different from the rest with the sculpture of terites. Maybe it's the gender, though.

But No. 3, in addition, has a reduced light pattern on the chest, including tegulae, and tergites of the abdomen. And at the same time, he has an unusual form of light baldric on the 1st tergite. A melanist? Intraspecific variability? confused.gif
Likes: 1

28.10.2015 15:19, Radik

Please help me with the definition. Tatarstan Nizhnekamsk district. Summer 2015

28.10.2015 23:16, Кархарот

And it also seems to me that Nos. 1-3 are noticeably different from the rest with the sculpture of terites. Maybe it's the gender, though.

But No. 3, in addition, has a reduced light pattern on the chest, including tegulae, and tergites of the abdomen. And at the same time, he has an unusual form of light baldric on the 1st tergite. A melanist? Intraspecific variability? confused.gif

More likely because of the floor plus different lighting.
I can't say anything about the color, as it is necessary to review a lot of material from this particular area in order to learn how to distinguish them by color. In the Crimea, I can distinguish all 9 species by color, but even then, only by females and if you can see not only the general body pattern from above, but also the platypus. Males are more difficult to deal with, and several species have similar coloration. And the variability is enormous, even in the same area and from the same nest. Reliable signs are the last segment of the tendril and the seventh sternite. Well, pubescence is also important, of course.

By the way, sorry for the offtopic, does anyone happen to have a photo of Pachycephus cruentatus (needed for the red Book of Crimea)? I looked at the material at the Moscow State University Zoo Museum , but it was all broken, and I didn't find it in Zina at all.

This post was edited by Carcharot - 28.10.2015 23: 18
Likes: 1

29.10.2015 0:43, Пензуит

More likely because of the floor plus different lighting.
I can't say anything about the color, as it is necessary to review a lot of material from this particular area in order to learn how to distinguish them by color. In the Crimea, I can distinguish all 9 species by color, but even then, only by females and if you can see not only the general body pattern from above, but also the platypus. Males are more difficult to deal with, and several species have similar coloration. And the variability is enormous, even in the same area and from the same nest. Reliable signs are the last segment of the tendril and the seventh sternite. Well, pubescence is also important, of course.


I rummaged among the photos of eumenes of poor quality, and I think I found some types of not quite characteristic color. Of course, just intraspecific variability is possible.


1. Probably Eumenes papillarius? The location of the yellow color is not the same as that of those previous eumenes.

picture: DSC06258_24.JPG
picture: DSC06265_24.JPG
picture: DSC06014_14.JPG



2. This eumene turned out very badly. But you can see that from the yellow on it only two transverse stripes on the abdomen. Although from such photos, I don't even hope that you can determine something frown.gif smile.gif

picture: DSC_7147_16.JPG
picture: DSC_7150_1.JPG



3. This one has only two small yellow spots on the entire thoracic region. Unfortunately, the abdomen could not be removed at all.

picture: DSCN8193_1.JPG
picture: DSCN8194_1.JPG

This post was edited by Penzuit - 29.10.2015 00: 57

29.10.2015 7:09, Radik

  Eutomostethus ephippium Panzer


Thank you for your help in identifying it!

29.10.2015 8:27, алекс 2611

 
2. This eumene turned out very badly.



And this is not Eumenes.
Yes and number 3 is also
Likes: 1

29.10.2015 9:18, AVA

And this is not Eumenes.
And number 3, too


Both seem to be Discoelius
Likes: 1

29.10.2015 12:10, Radik

Please help me. Please identify at least the genus
2009-06-30 Tatarstan, Nizhnekamsk region

29.10.2015 12:34, AVA

Please help me. Please identify at least the genus
2009-06-30 Tatarstan, Nizhnekamsk district


Most likely, the male Lasioglossum sp. Too small, however.

29.10.2015 13:12, Radik

Most likely, the male Lasioglossum sp. A little shallow, though.

I know it's a little small.
And, thank you for that!

29.10.2015 14:01, Radik

Who could it be? Netelia sp. or Ophion sp.?
Please give us a hint!

29.10.2015 14:21, алекс 2611

Please help me. Please identify at least the gender


If I didn't see the metallic sheen, it could be a male Halictus (Seladonia) tumulorum. But of course I would like a bigger and more honorable photo.

29.10.2015 14:33, AVA

If I didn't see the metallic sheen, it could be a male Halictus (Seladonia) tumulorum. But of course I would like a bigger and more honorable photo.


It seems to be the case by

29.10.2015 19:43, Nikel

Hello! Went out on 28/10/15 from Gall to wormwood. 1 mm. Gall collected on 15/10/15, Saratov. Photo 8081 - bites off a drop of water. Thanks!

Pictures:
picture: IMG_8070.JPG
IMG_8070.JPG — (294.09к)

picture: IMG_8071.JPG
IMG_8071.JPG — (314.36к)

picture: IMG_8081.JPG
IMG_8081.JPG — (291.69к)

29.10.2015 19:47, Nikel

Hello! From the Gauls on wormwood 26/10/15 came 2 pcs. Gall collected on 15/09/15, Saratov. Thanks!

Pictures:
picture: IMG_8008.JPG
IMG_8008.JPG — (296.81к)

picture: IMG_8006.JPG
IMG_8006.JPG — (308.6к)

29.10.2015 22:45, IchMan

Who could it be? Netelia sp. or Ophion sp.?
Please give us a hint!

Netelia

30.10.2015 7:04, Radik

Netelia


Thanks!
And, is it possible to determine up to the type?

30.10.2015 18:40, IchMan

Thanks!
And, is it possible to determine up to the type?

By photo nelzya

30.10.2015 21:13, pay

Good evening!A big request to the specialists, help determine the insect, or where to look.I thought it was a horntail, but I didn't find anything like it.Taken on July 24, Arkhangelsk
picture: DSC_7748_2_1.jpg
picture: DSC_7716.JPG

30.10.2015 21:31, Woodmen

Good evening!A big request to the specialists, help determine the insect, or where to look.I thought it was a horntail, but I didn't find anything like it.Taken on July 24, Arkhangelsk

And what did not suit the alder horntail-Xiphydria camelus?
Likes: 1

30.10.2015 21:45, NakaRB

all - D. New items-Begichevo, Serpukhov district, Moscow region.


41. 07.06.2015
user posted image

42. 12.06.2015
user posted image
user posted image

43. 12.06.2015
user posted image
user posted image

44. 13.06.2015
user posted image

45. 13.06.2015
user posted image

46. 13.06.2015
user posted image

47. 13.06.2015
user posted image
user posted image

30.10.2015 21:58, pay

And what did not suit the alder horntail-Xiphydria camelus?

Thanks for the hint, really similar, as it overlooked confused.gif

30.10.2015 23:00, Кархарот

I rummaged among the photos of eumenes of poor quality, and I think I found some types of not quite characteristic color. Of course, just intraspecific variability is possible.
1. Probably Eumenes papillarius? The location of the yellow color is not the same as that of those previous eumenes.

2. This eumene turned out very badly. But you can see that from the yellow on it only two transverse stripes on the abdomen. Although from such photos, I don't even hope that you can determine something frown.gif  smile.gif

3. This one has only two small yellow spots on the entire thoracic region. Unfortunately, the abdomen could not be removed at all.

1. It is possible, but no signs are visible.
2-3. Already answered, this is not eumenes, Discoelius, the signs of the species are also not visible.
Likes: 1

30.10.2015 23:03, Anton Kozyrev

Saratov Region, May 2015.1.2
picture: 2015_10_30_22.54.26_ZS_DMap_copy.jpg
.picture: 2015_10_30_23.19.02_ZS_DMap_copy.jpg

This post was edited by psih - 10/30/2015 23: 25

31.10.2015 1:02, IchMan

Please help me with the definition. Tatarstan Nizhnekamsk district. Summer 2015

I'm sorry, I lied - this is Eriocampa ovata

31.10.2015 12:04, TimK

Saratov Region, May 2015.1
.


1. Camponotus vagus.
Likes: 2

31.10.2015 17:40, IchMan

all - D. New items-Begichevo, Serpukhov district, Moscow region.

41. Argogorytes mystaceus L. (Crabronidae) f.
42. Braconidae
43. I have never seen such animals, - ? Macrophya teutona Pz. (Tenthredinidae) - according to the description, it seems to fit, the southern beast again...
44. Tenthredo mesomela L. (Tenthredinidae)
46. Tenthredopsis sp. similar to nassata (Tenthredinidae)
47. Tenthredo campestris L. (Tenthredinidae)
Likes: 1

31.10.2015 21:52, Anton Kozyrev

Tell me, please, and under the number 2 is it a sawfly or did I put this insect in the wrong section?

This post was edited by psih - 31.10.2015 21: 53

01.11.2015 3:21, IchMan

Tell me, please, and under the number 2 is it a sawfly or did I put this insect in the wrong section?

This is true not a sawfly, but the section is the one in the photo rider Ichneumonidae, Ichneumoninae, quite interesting (unusual) color, I do not know it.
Likes: 2

01.11.2015 8:04, gumenuk

Help me determine:
1 DSC06899 - Moscow region, Ramenskiy district, vicinity of the Khripan railway station, 11.07.2015.
2 DSC02856 - Moscow region, Ramenskiy district, vicinity of the Khripan railway station, 20.05.2015.
3 DSC07149 - Moscow region, Ramenskiy district, vicinity of the Khripan railway station, 18.07.2015.

Pictures:
picture: DSC06899.jpg
DSC06899.jpg — (316.48 k)

picture: DSC02856.jpg
DSC02856.jpg — (383.15к)

picture: DSC07149.jpg
DSC07149.jpg — (346.89к)

02.11.2015 13:59, Radik

Please help me determine. Tatarstan, Nizhnekamsk. September 2015.

03.11.2015 0:11, Пензуит

Thank you for all the definitions! It is still a mystery to me-how do you distinguish Polistes Nimpha from Polistes Dominula? As I understand it, Dominula is somewhat larger, all the spots and stripes are wider, the antennae are red. And Nimpha is smaller, its spots and stripes are narrower, there is a little dark color on the antennae? Or do I need to look at other signs?

For example, who is it? All - Penza region, July-August

1. ???

picture: DSCN1417_15.JPG
picture: DSCN1425_14__.JPG


_______________________________________________________________


2. ???

picture: DSCN2084_15.JPG
picture: DSCN2091_15.JPG

_______________________________________________________________


3. ???

picture: DSCN1464_16.JPG


________________________________________________________________

4. ???

picture: DSCN8657_16.JPG
picture: DSCN8662_15.JPG
picture: DSCN8666_15.JPG

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

5. ???

picture: DSCN9748_15.JPG
picture: DSCN9758_15.JPG


_________________________________________________________________


6. ???

picture: DSCN9949_15.JPG
picture: DSCN9951_15.JPG

________________________________________________________________


7. ???

picture: DSCN1829_15.JPG

This post was edited by Penzuit - 03.11.2015 00: 23

03.11.2015 0:47, ИНО

There is a flag, but only AVA knows it and keeps it secret until it is published. about the mustache: in the dominula, they are always bright orange (starting from the second segment of the flagellum) in the nymph, they are darkened from above, but the intensity of this darkening varies from almost complete (black color) until it is practically absent (orange color). So this feature is not reliable. You noticed the color patterns correctly, but this also varies greatly. Especially often in the keys appears the color of the last sternite of the abdomen. In nymphs, it is black (sometimes brownish at the end), in dominus it is yellow in the distal part, but in fact it is also pure black, although rarely. Males differ very well in the shape of the head, platypus and the last segment of the antennae. Therefore, 7 is definitely P. dominula. For the rest, I will only say presumably:
1-P. dominula;
3-two different wasps in fact-look at the drawing of the mid-spine, but, like, both P. dominula;
5,6 - P. biglumis, but here the share of confidence is even less, since I personally did not encounter this species at all. I just remembered that there is another similar species - P. bischoffi, which I am also not familiar with.
2-a strange combination of signs: for most - dominant, but confused by the reduction of the yellow pattern of the midrib and imagines its increased furiness.
But nothing, AVA will come-it will determine more precisely.

This post was edited by ENO-03.11.2015 01: 00
Likes: 1

03.11.2015 9:23, TimK

Thank you for all the definitions! It is still a mystery to me-how do you distinguish Polistes Nimpha from Polistes Dominula? As I understand it, Dominula is somewhat larger, all the spots and stripes are wider, the antennae are red. And Nimpha is smaller, its spots and stripes are narrower, there is a little dark color on the antennae? Or do I need to look at other signs?

For example, who is it? All - Penza region, July-August

1. ???


http://www.antvid.org/Vespa/Opred/Polistes%2005.html
Likes: 1

03.11.2015 9:34, TimK

There is a flag, but only AVA knows it and keeps it secret until it is published. about the mustache: in the dominula, they are always bright orange (starting from the second segment of the flagellum) in the nymph, they are darkened from above, but the intensity of this darkening varies from almost complete (black color) until it is practically absent (orange color). So this feature is not reliable. You noticed the color patterns correctly, but this also varies greatly. Especially often in the keys appears the color of the last sternite of the abdomen. In nymphs, it is black (sometimes brownish at the end), in dominus it is yellow in the distal part, but in fact it is also pure black, although rarely. Males differ very well in the shape of the head, platypus and the last segment of the antennae. Therefore, 7 is definitely P. dominula. For the rest, I will only say presumably:
1-P. dominula;
3-two different wasps in fact-look at the drawing of the mid-spine, but, like, both P. dominula;
5,6 - P. biglumis, but here the share of confidence is even less, since I personally did not encounter this species at all. I just remembered that there is another similar species - P. bischoffi, which I am also not familiar with.
2-a strange combination of signs: for most - dominant, but confused by the reduction of the yellow pattern of the midrib and imagines its increased furiness.
But nothing, AVA will come-it will determine more precisely.


In my opinion, No. 6 is a nymph. The cheek is yellow and the stripes on the back are bright.
# 5 - I don't know.
The rest are dominoes.
Likes: 1

03.11.2015 10:08, AVA

Thank you for all the definitions! It is still a mystery to me-how do you distinguish Polistes Nimpha from Polistes Dominula? As I understand it, Dominula is somewhat larger, all the spots and stripes are wider, the antennae are red. And Nimpha is smaller, its spots and stripes are narrower, there is a little dark color on the antennae? Or do I need to look at other signs?

For example, who is it? All - Penza region, July-August


Comparing these two species, forget about the differences in size and body color features - all yellow spots vary greatly in shape and size depending on the habitat and specific conditions of larval development, even within the same family. The same goes for body size.
The only persistent feature associated with coloration is completely red (after the 3rd segment) antennae in P. dominula and more or less darkened from above antennae in P. nimpha.

Males of these species differ better:
- in P. nimpha, the platelet is flat with developed lateral rollers, the tubercle between the bases of the antennae has a clear longitudinal furrow, the last segment of the antennae is approximately 3-3. 5 times longer than its thickness, the breast is yellow from below;
- in P. dominula, the platypus is uniformly convex and without lateral ridges, the tubercle between the bases of the antennae is without or with a barely noticeable groove, the last segment of the antennae is about 2 times longer than its thickness, the breast is usually black from below.

As a matter of fact, in addition to P. dominula, only three parasitic species (P. atrimandibularis, P. semenowi, and P. sulcifer) of our polistae of the nominative subgenus are characterized by completely rufous antennae, which are distinguished by their mandibles depressed from the outside, as well as mainly southern P. gallicus and eastern P. chinensis.

Of course, there are signs of sculpture, but they are usually not visible in photos.

Now, based on your photos:
1-4. Females of P. dominula
5-6. Females of P. nimpha
7. Male P. dominula
Likes: 1

Pages: 1 ...171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179... 277

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.