E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Identification of Hymenoptera (wasps, bees, ants)

Community and ForumInsects identificationIdentification of Hymenoptera (wasps, bees, ants)

Pages: 1 ...66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74... 277

17.11.2011 22:37, Кархарот

Here, of course, the shoulder angles are poorly visible, but I also see no reason to consider this specimen anything different from the previous male. Pubescence is within acceptable limits.
So this is S. bifasciatus.
Likes: 1

19.11.2011 21:09, akulich-sibiria

Simmorphus 8-9 mm. Krasnoyarsk, indoors. The female. The view is difficult. The parietal fovae are spaced quite far apart, slightly smaller than the size of the lateral ocelli. Two-pronged platelet with a shallow recess between them. The dotted line is quite rough and thick. The hairs on the back are short. The pronotum angles are obtuse and rounded.. At the last point, they are rare and not large. The sides of the mid-back are slightly glassy, with very rare weak points. Valvula gap. the segments at the top are pointed, elongated into rather long and sharp prong. The sides of the segment are obliquely-longitudinally wrinkled. The median field is faintly shiny, with slightly pronounced oblique grooves, and roughly cellular on the sides. The vertical part of the first tergite is equal to the horizontal one. The longitudinal stripe is pronounced. On the abdomen there are only 2 yellow stripes on 1-2 tergites. Perhaps it is S. lucens Kost.
picture: DSCN9065_.jpg
picture: DSCN9066_.jpg
picture: DSCN9068_.jpg
picture: DSCN9069_.jpg
picture: DSCN9072_.jpg
picture: DSCN9073_.jpg
picture: DSCN9074_.jpg

20.11.2011 8:17, Кархарот

I can't say for sure, I don't recognize the view. I also get S. lucens.
Likes: 1

20.11.2011 8:50, akulich-sibiria

Krasnoyarsk, slope of the Bazaikha River, edge of the birch forest. I think it's Panurgus calcaratus. About 8 mm. Hind legs are black, with yellow hairs. The apical parts of the tergites are weakly punctured, shagreen, and slightly depressed with a slight transverse striation. The gap.the segment is opaque, the median field with wrinkles radiating diagonally to the sides.
picture: DSCN9051_.jpg
picture: DSCN9077_.jpg
picture: DSCN9079_.jpg
picture: DSCN9080_.jpg

20.11.2011 9:21, akulich-sibiria

Krasnoyarsk, settled slopes, on forget-me-nots. Parapsidal furrows are not developed. There are no light bandages on the abdomen. Light hairs on the abdomen are thick and high on the first tergite, on the second they are much smaller. Abdominal brush is black. The gap. the segment is matte. The hair on the body and head is red. The hairs on the head are not so thick, they do not hide the punctuation of the platband. Abdomen with slightly depressed apical parts. I think it's either Osmia inermis Zett female, or Osmia uncinata Gerst.
picture: DSCN9081_.jpg
picture: DSCN9082_.jpg
picture: DSCN9083_.jpg
picture: DSCN9086_.jpg
picture: DSCN9087_.jpg
picture: DSCN9089_.jpg

20.11.2011 19:04, akulich-sibiria

Minusinsk, south of the Krasnoyarsk Territory, dacha plot, on the raspberry. About 10 mm.
2 return veins enter the second radiomedial cell. Wing caps are large, pointed at the back. 1st tergite without a sharp roll and a break between two planes, rounded. 1st tergite behind the yellow border without transparent border. Zadneschitik behind sharply abrupt, shiny, with edges with two raised denticles. An intermediate segment at the bottom with a clear prong. Valvula dismembered.
The legs are almost completely red, only the base of the thighs is darkened.
I think this is Antepipona orbitalis female
Say, the 3rd radiomedial cell is divided by a transverse vein – this is often found. I noticed this on one wing of this specimen. (see photo )
picture: DSCN9100_.jpg
picture: DSCN9101_.jpg
picture: DSCN9102_.jpg
picture: DSCN9103_.jpg
picture: DSCN9104_.jpg
picture: DSCN9105_.jpg
picture: DSCN9106_.jpg
picture: DSCN9107_.jpg

This post was edited by akulich-sibiria - 20.11.2011 19: 05

21.11.2011 18:56, Кархарот

Yes, it looks like it is Antepipona orbitalis ballioni (Morawitz, 1867).
The only thing that confuses me is that the photo with the rear window lights up, I can't make out anything. It should be so - the upper half of the posterior surface of the posterior mesenchytic is in large dots (you can say pits), and the lower half is perfectly smooth and shiny without any sculpture. All other attributes (all that are visible) match.
At the expense of cells-it happens very rarely. I've seen it once or twice before.

21.11.2011 19:34, akulich-sibiria

well, something like that, it's just very difficult to shoot black on black in contrast without glare. And with the cells, I almost got caught, because I began to determine exactly by this wing and could not understand what kind of additional cell it was, if there was something similar on the other wing, I think I would have come to a dead end immediately, determining the genus of this beast.
In general, is this type of mass production or not? I understand ballioni is a subspecies of some Siberian?

21.11.2011 20:58, Кархарот

The subspecies is not quite Siberian, it is more widespread. Just with a reduced and white (not yellow) pattern. We have for example in this species much more yellow than black. At the expense of how much the species is massive in your country, I do not know, but in my homeland it is not that extremely rare, but it is not caught every year, even in the best places for it.
Likes: 1

23.11.2011 16:19, akulich-sibiria

Eumenes coronatus Pz female think. I put it out to confirm everything thoroughly. Khakassia, Shirinsky district, on umbrella streets. The hairs on the back and sides of the chest are as shaggy and long as on the head. The hind and middle thighs are almost entirely black, and the hind legs are almost entirely light. Hairs on the 2nd stubble, except for short, there are long raised ones. The border behind the yellow stripe on the 2nd tergite is black
picture: Eumenes_coronatus_Pz______.jpg
picture: DSCN9108_.jpg
picture: DSCN9109_.jpg
picture: DSCN9110_.jpg

23.11.2011 21:48, Кархарот

Well, yes, it. Does not even differ from those that we have.
Likes: 1

24.11.2011 13:24, akulich-sibiria

Khakassia River, the bank of the Bely Ius River, on the umbrella islands.
Vesicles, srednespinka in the same long hairs as the platypus (especially at its base), there are also medium-long hairs on the second tergite, in addition, in long raised hairs basins. Hairs on the 2nd stubble are short.
The border behind the yellow stripe on the 2nd tergite is black, there are bandages on 3-4 tergites, as well as two points on the 5th. 4-5 sternites in fairly clear and uniform points. The pubescence is rather thick, raised, but not long. The hind thighs are black almost to the knees, the lower legs are light along the entire length. The legs are also light, the last segment of the legs is slightly darkened. Trim on top without deep indentation. There is a black border around the edges of the trim, but it does not reach the top, where the border color is light. There is a fairly deep hole at the top (relative sign) The spot on the forehead is slightly elongated, does not reach far to the platypus. The last part of the mustache is light, slightly bent, along the inner edge in very poorly noticeable hairs, which, however, form a row at the top and are visible.
It's quite difficult to understand what kind of species it is, but I still lean towards Eumenes coarctatus, mainly because of the hairs on the antennae. But perhaps it is Eumenes peduncularis or coronatus
picture: Eumenes_pedunculatus__Pz______.jpg
picture: DSCN9113_.jpg
picture: DSCN9115_.jpg
picture: DSCN9118_.jpg
picture: DSCN9119_.jpg
picture: DSCN9120_.jpg
picture: DSCN9121_.jpg
picture: DSCN9122_.jpg
picture: DSCN9124_.jpg
picture: DSCN9125_.jpg
picture: DSCN9126_.jpg
picture: DSCN9128_.jpg

25.11.2011 0:49, Кархарот

The last segment of the antennal flagellum is typical of Eumenes coarctatus, but in Eumenes peduncularis and E. coronatus they are not, so this is not them. But again, I can't make out what's wrong with the dotted line of the last sternite. If it is indeed E. coarctatus, it should not have separate scattered points (see the figure in the article by W. Gusenleitner).
Likes: 1

25.11.2011 2:55, akulich-sibiria

The last segment of the antennal flagellum is typical of Eumenes coarctatus, but in Eumenes peduncularis and E. coronatus they are not, so this is not them. But again, I can't make out what's wrong with the dotted line of the last sternite. If it is indeed E. coarctatus, it should not have separate scattered points (see the figure in the article by W. Gusenleitner).



The definitions didn't say anything about the punctuation of the last sternite. As I recall, it differs from the dotted lines of the previous sternites. From memory, we can say that it is rough-trained with very weak dotted lines, at home I will double-check and look at the drawings.
Of this genus, I still have one more species, named as E. mongolicus in the evening I will post photos.

25.11.2011 14:01, gstalker

help me identify the animal

Pictures:
picture: P1010572.JPG
P1010572.JPG — (127к)

picture: P1010574.JPG
P1010574.JPG — (120.91к)

picture: P1010575.JPG
P1010575.JPG — (101.48к)

26.11.2011 20:20, akulich-sibiria

Rep. Tyva, the Bank of the Yenisei, on the fly. About 13 mm. The hairs on the head, back and sides of the chest are long and raised. On 2 tergite and stubble very short. On the 2nd tergite from the sides in the first half there are a couple of fairly large spots and an apical band, followed by a transparent border. The tergite itself is not dense (in the center of the point is thicker), rather clear, but not deep points, on the sides of the point is very small and rare. From the 3rd sternite black. The platypus is completely black, shagreen, in rather rare spots, in long hairs. On the forehead there is a yellow patch of oblong shape, descending to the platypus. Thighs slightly above the middle are dark, lower legs are light, legs are light, on the middle legs the last three segments are darkened. On DV I go to Eumenes mongolicus female, on ECH I can't find anything similar, maybe sareptanus hairs on the temples near the eyes are short, then quite long .
picture: DSCN9129_.jpg
picture: DSCN9130_.jpg
picture: DSCN9131_.jpg
picture: DSCN9132_.jpg
picture: DSCN9133_.jpg
picture: DSCN9134_.jpg
picture: DSCN9135_.jpg
picture: DSCN9136_.jpg
picture: DSCN9137_.jpg

26.11.2011 21:22, akulich-sibiria

Krasnoyarsk, Torgashinsky ridge. Mid-thigh with two deep cutouts. There are light and black hairs on the body, quite thick and long. The cutout at the top of the platband is rather deeply cut, the processes on the sides are thickened. 2nd sternite with no longitudinal elevations, sparse fine dotted line, slightly glassy in the middle. The last segments of the antennae are not elongated. The apical segment is extended and oval in shape. Wing caps are dark. I think that this is Odynerus spinipes L male, but there is an assumption that it is of the type of melanocephalus, although the wing. the lids are dark.
picture: DSCN9138_.jpg
picture: DSCN9139_.jpg
picture: DSCN9140_.jpg
picture: DSCN9142_.jpg
picture: DSCN9143_.jpg
picture: DSCN9144_.jpg

27.11.2011 20:20, Кархарот

Oh, again I do not have these types, there is nothing to compare with. According to O. spinipes, only the female is present, and it is more darkly pubescent.
It's definitely not E. sareptanus or O. melanocephalus, I know these species well, and it's not them. Both of them are much more "bald", and the male O. melanocephalus has a slightly different platypus.
In general, I agree with E. mongolicus on the first one, but nothing else is suitable.
In the second case, I think that this is O. alpinus - the last segment of the flagellum is long and curved, see Fig. in Kurzenko's article, which I sent you. Can't you see what's going on with the longitudinal elevations on the second stubble?
Likes: 1

28.11.2011 14:38, akulich-sibiria

I tried to photograph the last segments of the antennae of the last Odynerus, but the infection is so twisted that you can't get there right away. frown.gif . In general, as I could showed. From the side, it is not curved, if viewed from the front and back, it is quite strongly expanded, and in general the last segments of the antennae are wider than in length. It's just that if it's an alpinus, then I don't understand where it should be curved. On the 2nd sternite, I did not find any longitudinal elevations, I tried to change the angle of light, I could not see, if they are very insignificant. Or am I looking in the wrong place?? confused.gif
picture: DSCN9146_.jpg
picture: DSCN9147_.jpg
picture: DSCN9148_.jpg
picture: DSCN9149_.jpg

28.11.2011 18:04, Кархарот

Yes, now you can see that it's not alpinus. On the second sternum, it seems that some elevations are visible, but not obvious. In general, we will assume that spinipes since nothing else is suitable.
It's probably time for me to expand the collection, otherwise banal views are difficult to identify due to the lack of material... confused.gif

28.11.2011 19:23, akulich-sibiria

Khakassia, the bank of the Bely Ius River. On umbrella sites. The shield is steep with denticles on the top. It is approached by two powerful teeth from below, formed by the side keels of the gap.a segment. The sides of the segment are longitudinally folded. The body is covered with thick but short raised hairs. The last segment of the middle and hind legs is darkened. On the second tergite after the light band, there is an edge border, but it is not visible that it would be bent to the top. Mandibles with a rather large yellow spot. In the middle of the 2nd sternite, I did not find a clear longitudinal groove. The yellow band of the first tergite is not particularly expanded on the sides, it has a sinuous pattern. There are 5 yellow bandages on the tergites. On the 6th, there is a barely noticeable yellow-brown spot. It is closest to Euodynerus notatus, but the absence of a longitudinal groove on the second sternum and a bent marginal border is disconcerting.
picture: DSCN9150_.jpg
picture: DSCN9151_.jpg
picture: DSCN9152_.jpg
picture: DSCN9153_.jpg
picture: DSCN9155_.jpg
picture: DSCN9156_.jpg
picture: DSCN9157_.jpg
picture: DSCN9158_.jpg

28.11.2011 19:37, akulich-sibiria

well, that's all I have so far from this family, well, not counting public oss, I kind of identified all of them a long time ago. Thank you very much for the definitions, maybe I will still find something in the bins of my fees.))

28.11.2011 22:02, Кархарот

No, closer to E. quadrifasciatus. A clear sign - pubescence on the back is almost as long as on the forehead. In addition, the mandibles are too yellow for E. notatus, even more yellow than I have in the south. Well, there is no furrow. And there is a long hairline at the temples. It's a pity you can't see the pubescence of the pleura-this is also a good sign. If I'm right, there should also be well-developed hairs.
Thank you very much for the definitions

Yes, in general, not for that, you yourself have almost determined everything except S. connexus and this.
At the same time, I trained to determine from the pictures, it was not so easy. smile.gif
Look again at the males of Ancistrocerus, A. parietinus should have a very wide platypus, and with the "normal" one - all A. parietum (as you can see in those photos that I sent, for some reason they are not attached here).

29.11.2011 1:29, Guest

If I'm not really bothering you, I'll post a little more....: - [
yesterday in the square of Almaty.
3. ?
user posted image

Oh, you're in luck! - in the square of Almaty... smile.gif
This is Scolia sinensis Sauss.
Likes: 1

29.11.2011 2:52, akulich-sibiria

No, closer to E. quadrifasciatus. A clear sign - pubescence on the back is almost as long as on the forehead. In addition, the mandibles are too yellow for E. notatus, even more yellow than I have in the south. Well, there is no furrow. And there is a long hairline at the temples. It's a pity you can't see the pubescence of the pleura-this is also a good sign. If I'm right, there should also be well-developed hairs.

Yes, in general, not for that, you yourself have almost determined everything except S. connexus and this.
At the same time, I trained to determine from the pictures, it was not so easy. smile.gif
Look again at the males of Ancistrocerus, A. parietinus should have a very wide platypus, and with the "normal" one - all A. parietum (as you can see in those photos that I sent, for some reason they are not attached here).


I had an idea about quadrifasciatus, with which it was even more partially similar in DV than in EC, but it seems that it is indicated for this species-shaggy long hairs, which are not the same length on the head and on the back, namely long. Okay, I'll check it out again at home.

01.12.2011 19:51, gstalker

help me identify the animal

can someone help me

01.12.2011 20:45, Сергуха

can someone help me

Someone from the Tenthredinidae ?

02.12.2011 6:44, Egorus

Likes: 1

03.12.2011 20:42, akulich-sibiria

Krasnoyarsk, the bank of the reservoir, on the umbrella. In early July. About 10 mm.
Shield on the sides without directed teeth. The legs are completely black. The 6th sternite is not elongated into a prong, there is no raised longitudinal keel on it. The forehead is evenly dotted, without shiny areas. The spurs of the hind legs are light, sharp, and curved at the apex. The median field of the intermediate segment is shiny, not dotted. Platypus at the base with a smooth longitudinal strip. Platypus in rather thick light hairs. Midrib in dense, uniform rough spots. On the first 3 tergites, the lateral fringes of light hairs are strongly interrupted, then they are hardly noticeable. The 6th tergite seems to descend in steps, and is widely rounded at the top. The last sign is suspicious, but I think it's still Hoplitis acuticornis female
picture: DSCN9178_.jpg
picture: DSCN9179_.jpg
picture: DSCN9180_.jpg
picture: DSCN9181_.jpg
picture: DSCN9182_.jpg
picture: DSCN9183_.jpg
picture: DSCN9185_.jpg
picture: DSCN9186_.jpg

04.12.2011 12:32, А. Лебедев

Tell me, what kind of insect is this?
Elbrus region, mid-August, altitude 2300 m.

Pictures:
picture: DSC_4257.JPG
DSC_4257.JPG — (114.67к)

picture: DSC_4258.JPG
DSC_4258.JPG — (114.2к)

04.12.2011 14:04, OEV

Tell me, what kind of insect is this?
Elbrus region, mid-August, altitude 2300 m.


Dear A. Lebedev if you do not know who is in the photo then in this topic Who is it? Definition wink.gif

04.12.2011 14:18, А. Лебедев

Moved it to the specified topic.

04.12.2011 16:18, akulich-sibiria

this is the scorpioness Panorpa sp. female
Likes: 1

08.12.2011 18:44, Liparus

Yes, it's a birthmark. Very variable in color appearance. You have such beautiful ones, but we have no red color at all.

This year I collected a female with red color and a male without red color in the Crimea.

10.12.2011 21:28, Mantispid

There is little hope, apparently some Nomada...

Saratov region, Lugovskoe village, on apple blossoms, 4-9. 5. 10

Pictures:
picture: Osa_bok.jpg
Osa_bok.jpg — (192.16к)

picture: Osa_golova.jpg
Osa_golova.jpg — (204.61к)

picture: Osa_verx.jpg
Osa_verx.jpg — (189.39к)

10.12.2011 22:32, akulich-sibiria

she is sama

10.12.2011 22:47, Mantispid

Nomada ?fucata, ?male

11.12.2011 1:46, Guest

This year I collected a female with red color and a male without red color in the Crimea.

In the lowland Crimea, yes-with red. On the southern bank - without red, only with a slight brownish clearing along the edges of the black spot.

11.12.2011 12:51, алекс 2611

Nomada ?fucata, ?male

alternative version-Nomada lathburiana (Kirby, 1802) female smile.gif
Likes: 1

11.12.2011 13:33, Mantispid

alternative version-Nomada lathburiana (Kirby, 1802) female smile.gif

Well, it probably is, thank you

Pages: 1 ...66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74... 277

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.