Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

if we are talking about icteric, then I did not find it there either..
http://www.cerambyx.uochb.cz/
but there is definitely one here

My cylindrica and icterica are here:
http://www.zin.ru/ANIMALIA/Coleoptera/rus/loboda6.htm
Maybe they haven't even reached the atlas yet...

Yes, it seems that there is no, I can not find, there is only a mention in the text in some pdf. It would be necessary to take a picture of it normally and send it to Lobanov...

http://www.zin.ru/animalia/coleoptera/rus/phyaffdk.htm

That's it
S. lutshniki is sort of a synonym for S. cuprina
. For some reason, it seems to me that it is from the first pile. The kind that doesn't have much indentation. With an indentation - it's like a beetle from Khakassia or Kuprina.
Here is the
exarate погляди:www.zin.ru/animalia/ Coleoptera/eng/volk_f3.htm
And about the gallery-a good thing, but the group is generally very gloomy, Obenberger how many times to himself in synonyms flew.

I also agree. True, I have only three pieces from this group, and two of them are of the same type. Tomorrow I will throw off another view, it is very similar to the sphenopter shown here. Previously called her Kuprina..
Due to the fact that the types are not repeated in different determinants, it is clear that not everything is so simple..

put everyone in the insect images, see if you can identify

good evening. here's another sphenoptera. In green, it looks like cuprina, in red, it looks like pallasia. The process of the prothorax is not edged at the top, on the sides of the point, sometimes forming grooves. The ribs on the elytra are smoothed, hardly noticeable. The vertexes are rounded. I apologize for the hole in the pronotum. Someone must have bullied her before me

Maybe someone knows what kind of animal it is? Caught in the mountain-taiga zone of the Khabarovsk Territory. According to the determinant, the DV stubbornly falls into saperdini, and then everything... or how Can you tell me where I'm wrong?

Pictures:

saperdini.jpg — (108.87к)

  
Calathus sp - can it be Calathus cinchus (=erythroderus)?

Most likely it is either Calathus melanocephalus or Calathus mollis

molodoi:
I don't know much about DV. It's like Saperda, probably alberti

Elephant - ?Pachypera spissa (Boheman, 1842)

It is not a fact that Pachypera spissa (Boheman, 1842) - the lower legs are not expanded at the apices and the pronotum is not transverse

Vabrus:
looks like Rhaphauma gracilipes

Oh, Rip, sps. Only probably Rhaphuma

aha

Gentlemen, Tell me, this is Leptura rubra L. Thanks!!! Kiev, 26.07.08 under an oak stump.

Pictures:

IMG_1420.jpg — (87.22к)

Gentlemen, Tell me, this is Leptura rubra L. Thanks!!! Kiev, 26.07.08 under an oak stump.

the female. Only correctly in my opinion Aredolpona rubra (Linnaeus, 1758)

This post was edited by Entalex - 29.01.2009 23: 46

And tell me, what is the male then?

male with a black pronotum and beige elytra
but what to say, it is better to show http://www.cerambyx.uochb.cz/

This post was edited by RippeR - 30.01.2009 01: 05

Vabrus:
looks like Rhaphauma gracilipes

and you can ask, the genus Rhaphauma is not Chlorophorus...I have this genus with the specific name gracilipes...

rhaphuma and chlorophorus are two completely different genera. Although in some ways they are similar.. gracilipes is generally most similar to Chlorophorus figuratus in size and pattern, but they are still very different. Chlorophorusus also has the gracilis species, which is much smaller and does not have gray spots at the base of the elytra

I hope it doesn't bother you to identify this beetle. Caught in the light. Kyiv.

Pictures:

IMG_1421.jpg — (107.95к)


IMG_1423.jpg — (119.4к)

Rhamnusium bicolor, a good beetle
just please stop making fun of the material

This is from my initial experience.He is already 7 years old. And what does good mean? Rare? So we have a lot of them flying to the light in the summer! Explain Uv. RippeR!

And, tell me, is it the same, only a female? Thanks!!!!

rhaphuma and chlorophorus are two completely different genera. Although in some ways they are similar.. gracilipes is generally most similar to Chlorophorus figuratus in size and pattern, but they are still very different. Chlorophorusus also has the gracilis species, which is much smaller and does not have gray spots at the base of the elytra.

Chlorophorus does not have any gracilis. There is gratiosus.
Rhaphuma and Chlorophorus differ, alas, not as well as we would like.

And, tell me, is it the same, only a female? Thanks!!!!

Sorry! I forgot my photo.

Pictures:

IMG_1424.jpg — (123.9к)

well, as there is no gracelipes, there they are in the Internet is full, can certainly be mistaken
. http://zooex.baikal.ru/beetles/cerambycidae3.htm

Southern coast of Crimea, steppe zone, August. I didn't shoot it, I don't know any more details - they asked me to identify it (comments to the photos from the person who shot it).

That's how it sits during the day:


And this is if you pull it out of the sink:


After it was pulled out of the sink, it began to run convulsively and then climbed back into the sink...

To RippeR & Fornax13: I think it's a Donus of some sort...

I also had the same idea... Are there any donuses (from real ones - I mean, not Antidonus) in Moldova? I haven't come up with anything yet...

sapalex:
yes, it looks like that too, only it's more like a male..
Lucky if you have it in droves to the light flies.. We have his figs you will catch - the best 2 elytra found Although it is difficult to say, maybe they are rare here, and in other places they are frequent, or maybe even we have some place where there are a lot of them.. Yves Zborakh didn't seem to see them very often.

KDG:
well, maybe they don't have enough features to separate them into the ottenlny genus Rhaphuma (I don't know this, because I don't know the specific features of these genera, i.e. why they are separated). But if you find rapfuma, you can immediately see that this is rafuma, and not chlorophorus gracilis, although what other different species are there in Asia, maybe you can confuse it with something.. But the Asian fauna is practically unknown to me
And about chlorophorus gracilis, I generally froze, I thought about sartor, but gracilis

Fornax13:
eh, if I knew about elephants, I would say..
Do you need any more details? Maybe a photo of some specific body parts?

DC I, too, with these guys have not encountered even once Well, you can interest for the sake of the front shins strictly on top and prsp. in the same perspective - just not the fact that it will give anything (to me, anyway).

Here is such a scarab. Ukraine, Kherson region 17.08.96. Scarabaeus saccer L. ? Thanks!

Pictures:

IMG_1425.jpg — (128.03к)


IMG_1426.jpg — (132к)

Southern coast of Crimea, steppe zone, August. I didn't shoot it, I don't know any more details - they asked me to identify it (comments to the photos from the person who shot it).

The larva of a dead-eating beetle is. ?Ablattaria sp.

Here is such a scarab. Ukraine, Kherson region 17.08.96. Scarabaeus saccer L. ? Thanks!

I think it's still Scarabaeus typhon

I think it's still Scarabaeus typhon

Tell me, please, by what signs you determined that this is Scarabaeus typhon. I would be very grateful!

Tell me, please, by what signs you determined that this is Scarabaeus typhon. I would be very grateful!

Rather, I did not define it, but assumed it . The two types are very similar. For an accurate definition, it would be nice to "drive" your beetle according to the book by O. N. Kabakov. The differences are insignificant: in typhon, the middle clipping of the platypus is wider, semicircular, and the lateral ones are almost triangular; in sacer, all the clippings between the teeth of the platypus are semicircular, while the middle one is slightly wider than the lateral ones. In terms of distribution, typhon goes further north than sacer (Kabakov notes that typhon in Ukraine reaches the vicinity of Kamenets-Podolsk, the south of Chernihiv and Zhytomyr regions, and sacer lives only in the extreme south of the steppes of Ukraine - in particular, in Askania-Nova). Although, your beetle is also from the Kherson region...

This post was edited by Dmitrich - 31.01.2009 01: 57

In Moldova, presumably, satser lived.. But I don't know how true the definition is. it lived in the south of Moldova. In the Crimea, as everyone says, typhon lives.. I don't know what to say about the Kherson region.. It can be anything..

If you compare with my typhon from the Crimea and satzer from Israel, and also apply Kabakov's book, then the photo shows satzer. Just his frontal keels end in bumps. Yes, and the punctuation of the perdnespinki and boski does not seem to be rough.

Rather, I did not define it, but assumed it . The two types are very similar. For an accurate definition, it would be nice to "drive" your beetle according to the book by O. N. Kabakov. The differences are insignificant: in typhon, the middle clipping of the platypus is wider, semicircular, and the lateral ones are almost triangular; in sacer, all the clippings between the teeth of the platypus are semicircular, while the middle one is slightly wider than the lateral ones. In terms of distribution, typhon goes further north than sacer (Kabakov notes that typhon in Ukraine reaches the vicinity of Kamenets-Podolsk, the south of Chernihiv and Zhytomyr regions, and sacer lives only in the extreme south of the steppes of Ukraine - in particular, in Askania-Nova). Although, your beetle is also from the Kherson region...

Thanks!!! I read the forum on scarabs and I think that I will define it for a long time! And the beetle was found on the Kingburg Spit, in the Black Sea Nature Reserve. Xati it was already completely dry.