Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Good evening. Here are some more beetles.
1. Krasnoyarsk. It seems to me that this is something from the Melyridae.
-the first segment of the legs is quite long. Upper lip is transverse. The claws are developed. Epipleura only up to the level of the posterior thorax. 6 visible sternites. The last member of the maxillary palps is cylindrical. Claws with a record. The body is covered with sparse standing black hairs and gray. adjacent white hairs.
Similar to Psilothrix femoralis. But Zhukov had never encountered it before. Tell me.



2. Novosibirsk. Birch tree. an elephant from Phyllobius. 6 mm. Thighs without teeth. The whiskies are long. Rounded scales of grayish-green color. In the middle of the nadkr. Spot of scales of brownish color. The tops of the shins are extended. The abdomen is gray-green with hair-like scales. The antennae and legs are reddish. Similar to Ph. parvulus, but larger in size.


3. Novosibirsk. Rosaceae. 3 mm without trunk. Like from
Anthonomus, the head tube is long and curved. There is a prong on the nails. Scalloped thighs. Elytra extending posteriorly. Between the eyes, the forehead is indented. Bandages on nadkr. no, all in pressed light hairs.


4. From the same genus, but the color is darker. There may be a color variation.

5. Novosibirsk. Rynchaenus lonicerae, but the signs don't quite fit. I was caught on honeysuckle just in time. It looks like just scalloped stripes on the elytra. But not all theses go.



another bug.

Needles it's not me them so

To vasiliy-feoktistov:
3 afodka with such foggy spots and was during his lifetime? Can you take photos of the bristles along the edges of the apical section of the lower legs?

To akulich-sibiria:
1-й из Dasytidae. It doesn't work on Dasytes by key?

To vasiliy-feoktistov:
3 afodka with such foggy spots and was during his lifetime? Can you take photos of the bristles along the edges of the apical section of the lower legs?

Yes, he was like that when he was alive, and the camera just won't take the bristles from me. And that there are any suspicions?

Yes, he was like that when he was alive, and the camera just won't take the bristles from me. And that there are any suspicions?

Come on, I wanted to be honest
Maybe it's true that rufus (=scybalarius) is like this, but the spots are confusing.

Come on, I wanted to be honest
It may be true that rufus (=scybalarius) is like this, but the spots are confusing.

Yes, and they also confuse me (then I still picked up a bunch of A. fimetarius-which is always full), but I got one with spots.
P.S. And maybe the truth is rufus: http://www.fugleognatur.dk/wildaboutdenmar...phodius%20rufus Thanks!

This post was edited by vasiliy-feoktistov - 10/22/2009 20: 52

Is it possible to guess from these disgusting pictures in which direction to dig this harpalus? Nowhere beats neither on green, nor on Isaev, nor on Hickey. Moscow oblast. At least up to a group of types to direct thoughts. 9,5 мм.

Good evening. Here are some more beetles.
3. Novosibirsk. Rosaceae. 3 mm without trunk. Like from
Anthonomus, the head tube is long and curved. There is a prong on the nails. Scalloped thighs. Elytra extending posteriorly. Between the eyes, the forehead is indented. Bandages on nadkr. no, all in pressed light hairs.
4. From the same genus, but the color is darker. There may be a color variation.

If the claws did not have a tooth at the base, it would be possible to assume that this is Anthonomus variants (it is variable in color). But you say-a prong on the "nails" ... And exactly it is?

5. Novosibirsk. Rynchaenus lonicerae, but the signs don't quite fit. I was caught on honeysuckle just in time. It looks like just scalloped stripes on the elytra. But not all theses go.

And what exactly is confusing? On my Rynchaenus lonicerae is very similar.

Here's another photo #3 just in case. What are the signs? Do you have any suspicions?

He reminds me of someone from A. (Nobius). For example A. (N.) gresseri Semenov, 1898.

He reminds me of someone from A. (Nobius). For example, A. (N.) gresseri Semenov, 1898.

Yes no not Nobius: http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/rus/aphnbssg.htm "more like Rufus."

This post was edited by vasiliy-feoktistov - 23.10.2009 11: 18

No, I'll PASS! Something Central European. I also wrote that there is a certain Pt. hungaricus, indicated just for the extreme west of the former. Union and close to melas. But I've never seen him.

I looked at my Transcarpathian (floodplain forest) collections and this is what I saw. Pt. melas is smaller than Podolsk and has 3 setae on the elytra in places. The most interesting thing - on one elytra 2, on the second - 3 pores. So go figure it out now.

I looked at my Transcarpathian (floodplain forest) collections and this is what I saw. Pt. melas is smaller than Podolsk and has 3 setae on the elytra in places. The most interesting thing - on one elytra 2, on the second - 3 pores. So go figure it out now.

And here I am on eurocarabidae.I also found a Pt. melas with three pores and a color similar to mine...
http://eurocarabidae.de/photo/593/

To akulich-sibiria:
1-й из Dasytidae. It doesn't work on Dasytes by key?
[/quote]

As I understand it, Dasytes has claws, while this one has translucent plates along the claws. Although it looks quite similar to Dasytes fusculus

If the claws did not have a tooth at the base, it would be possible to assume that this is Anthonomus variants (it is variable in color). But you say-a prong on the "nails" ... And exactly it is?

the teeth are definitely at the base of the claws!! In addition, like varians lives on pine, and this one on rosaceae. Or am I confusing something?

And what exactly is confusing? On my Rynchaenus lonicerae is very similar.

as it seems to me, this elephant has a shield with rather long white hairs and the sides of the pronotum and elytra without long protruding hairs. According to these theses, I can't find lonicerae, although it looks exactly like it in the description.

  
Is it possible to guess from these disgusting pictures in which direction to dig this harpalus? Nowhere beats neither on green, nor on Isaev, nor on Hickey. Moscow oblast. At least up to a group of types to direct thoughts. 9,5 mm.

Harpalus smaragdinus (Duftschmid 1812).

This post was edited by evk - 10/25/2009 21: 35

Please tell me if possible...

1. Afghanistan, Bamian, Bande-Amir, h = 3000 m, 01.07.2009
Length 18 mm.

2. From the same place. Length 15 mm.

This post was edited by Buzman - 26.10.2009 12: 01

Pictures:

01.jpg — (91.86 k)


02.jpg — (91.87 k)

2nd - probably something from Pseudocleonus (subg. Phryganocleonus).

Northern Ustyurt (Z.Kazakhstan, northern desert subzone), June.
Zlatki:

Pictures:

Sphenoptera_DSC_0434_N_of_Beineu__________________________.jpg — (43.6к)


Sphenophora_DSC_0866__________________________.JPG — (62.48к)

1. Cyphosoma tataricum (Pallas, 1773)
2. may Sphenoptera (s.str) cuprina Motschulsky, 1860

This post was edited by Alexey Sazhnev - 10/27/2009 20: 21

1 - Sphenoptera (s. str.) sp.
2 - Sphenoptera (Chrysoblemma) sp.
They are not very well identified by beetles... And only from the photo...

This post was edited by Fornax13-27.10.2009 20: 48

))) and where tsifosom delhi))))?

A flipper from the Ustyurt Nature Reserve (SW Kazakhstan), caught in October, at a considerable distance from the water.

Pictures:

DSC_0320a.jpg — (154.71к)

dc, not plavunchik, but plavunets sie

))) and where tsifosom delhi))))?

I wanted to change it to a smaller photo, but nothing...( I will post in the topic zlatok. Thank you.

))) and where tsifosom delhi))))?

Where was she?" )))

dc, not a plavunchik, but a plavunets this

Eretes sticticus or something...

It looks like a female like

Eretes sticticus or something...

Looks like. Thanks! There are also males with suckers.

On the advice of Vasily Dyadichko, look at the subject Eretes griseus

You're welcome.
Then exactly. He's kind of the only one there

upd: Or not?

This post was edited by Fornax13-27.10.2009 21: 03

Take another look at a couple of ground beetles, pzh. Oktyabrskie, from the same place.
The second one is 15 mm.

Pictures:

Cymindis_DSC_0435.JPG — (127.09к)


DSC_0436.JPG — (147.18к)

1 - Cymindis ?picta
2-Pseudotaphoxenus, probably some....

2. Pseudotaphoxenus - but there seem to be quite a few of them

2. Pseudotaphoxenus - but there seem to be quite a few of them there

I looked in the topic Sphodrini, where there is a great selection from EVK. To the sozh.I didn't find this one (with dotted grooves). It also seems that Laemostenus can be similar...

1 - Cymindis ?picta

Not, not like, either picta or lineata.( They're over there:

Pictures:

Cymindis_picta___Cymindis_lineata_0026__________________________.JPG — (92.48к)

Northern Ustyurt (Z.Kazakhstan, northern desert subzone), June.
Zlatki:

The first is not a Cyphosoma! It's some kind of Sphenoptera. Very likely S. cuprina Motsch.
The second is 90% Sphenoptera orichalcea Pall.

The first is not a Cyphosoma! It's some kind of Sphenoptera. Very likely S. cuprina Motsch.
The second is 90% Sphenoptera orichalcea Pall.

dc, initially there were 3 photos )))

Take another look at a couple of ground beetles, pzh. Oktyabrskie, from the same place.
The second one is 15 mm.

1. Cymindis accentifera Men.
2. Pseudotaphoxenus sp. "I'll pass, it's too complicated!"