E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Community and Forum → Insects identification → Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Pages: 1 ...49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57... 854

02.11.2007 19:59, Necrocephalus

Olisthopus rotundatus - alarming. He's a xerophile, after all. And the forest where he was caught is wet, floodplain.
Could it be Olisthopus sturmi Daftschmid, 1812 ?

I think this is Synuchus vivalis Pk. (nivalis Pk.)
Likes: 1

02.11.2007 20:47, rpanin

I think it's Synuchus vivalis Pk. (nivalis Pk.)


Exactly, sort of similar.
http://www.habitas.org.uk/groundbeetles/sp...s.asp?item=7317

02.11.2007 23:03, Bad Den

12.5_mm.jpg — Amara (Curtonotus) sp., IMHO

02.11.2007 23:34, Archypus

Exactly, sort of similar.
http://www.habitas.org.uk/groundbeetles/sp...s.asp?item=7317

I had my doubts about this, beetles are really very similar. Outweighed by the fact that the legs and antennae are yellow, and not red, which should be in Synuchus vivalis. In addition, the latter is similar to Calatus micropterus. I didn't see any such similarity here. We need to look at the birth signs, then everything will fall into place. Synuchus vivalis has serrated claws, while Olisthopus has smooth claws. On Olisthopus sturmi does not pull, the smaller growth-5mm

02.11.2007 23:37, Fornax13

Hello! Can you tell me what kind of bug it is?
Shot in a meadow near Moscow on the leaf of Veronica shiroklistnaya in late May
.

Athous of some sort. It's unlikely from the photo - you need to look at it. Snappers are not the easiest group to identify.
Likes: 1

03.11.2007 0:30, omar

Have I completely caught up?? shuffle.gif

To be honest, I thought you were kidding right. smile.gif

03.11.2007 0:37, omar

Recent images: 100% ofon, the one that is 9 mm
. 11 mm Calathus, see Budden's recently posted article on
Harpalus coleopterists, but I won't say the type, I don't know your fauna, I've never been, I've already said it frown.gif
13 mm here I do not know at all... shuffle.gif
Likes: 1

03.11.2007 1:24, Fornax13

Which is 12.5 mm, I would say Curtonotus aulicus (Panz.). But Ophonus sympatricus is probably puncticollis. Steppe Harpalus-a clean kill. But this one is really similar to serripes. Calathus-explicit fuscipes.

This post was edited by Fornax13-03.11.2007 01: 56
Likes: 3

03.11.2007 1:49, Fornax13

Although no, with such dimensions serripes is unlikely... And shiny too. I'd like to see it from below."

03.11.2007 2:06, Aleksey Adamov

Although no, with such dimensions serripes is unlikely... And shiny too. I'd like to see it from below."

Yes, there can be a dozen or more options from the back. This is Harpalus...
Likes: 2

03.11.2007 22:37, guest: rpanin

Which is 12.5 mm, I would say Curtonotus aulicus (Panz.). But Ophonus sympatricus is probably puncticollis. Steppe Harpalus-a clean kill. But this one is really similar to serripes. Calathus-explicit fuscipes.


Ophonus - maybe rufibarbis ?

03.11.2007 22:38, guest: rpanin

Yes, there can be a dozen or more options from the back. This is Harpalus...

Got it! It will be done! wink.gif

03.11.2007 23:06, Fornax13

Ophonus - maybe rufibarbis ?

Maybe him, too. If the base of the pronotum is not bordered, then most likely.

04.11.2007 0:03, Guest

Athous of some sort. It's unlikely from the photo - you need to look at it. Snappers are not the easiest group to identify.


If the forest near Moscow, then there are not so many options. Probably Athous subfuscus.
Likes: 1

04.11.2007 0:07, алекс 2611

I don't register something on the forum recently. The last message is mine.

04.11.2007 10:03, Juglans

Today we flew here such small plate-moustaches (Vladivostok, +10).

Pictures:
picture: DSC_0023.JPG
DSC_0023.JPG — (77.91к)

04.11.2007 10:09, Bad Den

2 Juglans
Is Aphodius some

05.11.2007 0:38, KDG

Likes: 1

05.11.2007 1:12, RippeR

omar:
just took a quick look, just looked at the end of the elytra, but the mandibles with chschupikami, did not bother to compare with the reality, but the color is similarsmile.gif, because I don't know much about beetles smile.gif
I will learn to make fun competently wink.gif
Likes: 1

08.11.2007 22:07, Aleksey Adamov

Something didn't work out for me to determine (by definition). Kryzhanovsky) this beetle. even to the genus!
Who does he look like? Tell me...

I forgot to measure it. Approximately 1 cm.

Caught it in a sandy floodplain.

picture: 1.jpg
Likes: 1

08.11.2007 22:44, Bad Den

Something didn't work out for me to determine (by definition). Kryzhanovsky) this beetle. even to the genus!
Who does he look like? Tell me...

I forgot to measure it. Approximately 1 cm.

Caught it in a sandy floodplain.

[attachmentid()=30992]

As far as I remember, I defined such as Oxypselaphus obscurus (Herbst, 1784)
Likes: 1

09.11.2007 15:12, omar

Yeah. Former Agonum. Lives where it's wet.

09.11.2007 16:00, Aleksey Adamov

Yes! When I was defining it by Kryzhanovsky, I went to Agonum. I was surprised, I'm not used to seeing such agonums smile.gif. But for the sake of fun, I decided to identify the species and went to A. obscurum – I was even more surprised, but still did not believe my definition.

09.11.2007 16:03, omar

A massive, and seemingly almost ubiquitous, species in the midlands. Is it really rare in the South?

09.11.2007 16:07, Aleksey Adamov

I worked hard mostly in one small area, but I didn't get caught there. This year we went to the sandy peninsula (Tsemlyanskoe reservoir), there were a lot of them.
Likes: 2

09.11.2007 16:10, omar

And, interestingly, it comes across not only near water, but also in the litter of deciduous forests.

09.11.2007 16:38, Дзанат

under the bark of pine
Likes: 1

10.11.2007 3:49, BO.

Help identify the barbel. Astrakhan region.

Pictures:
picture: P_1250094web.jpg
P_1250094web.jpg — (173.76к)

10.11.2007 9:26, Bad Den

BO, this is Aegomorphus sp., either A. wojtylai or A. clavipes

11.11.2007 2:16, BO.

BO, this is Aegomorphus sp., either A. wojtylai or A. clavipes

Thanks! And for a more precise definition of what details are missing ?

11.11.2007 11:42, Aleksandr Safronov

Thanks! And for a more precise definition of what details are missing ?

Genitalia wink.gif
Likes: 1

11.11.2007 18:44, RippeR

I think it's Voltilay.. We are waiting for Denis, he can even do it without genitals, by the power of his mind! smile.gif

12.11.2007 0:45, Bad Den

I have a question about the weevil.
He identified it from Isaev's latest work as Mononychus punctumalbum (Herbst, 1784). Confuses that on "green" I do not go out on this kind in any way-there are no zagorbnichny prsp blades. Plus the color - there is no white prishchitkovogo spot.
The size is about 4.5-5 mm.
Collected in the Kursk region on 18. V. 2007, on a marsh plant (photo of the plant is attached), presumably buttercup
user posted image user posted image

And here is a photo of the weevil itself:
user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

Who do you think this is?

This post was edited by Bad Den-08.04.2018 18: 15

12.11.2007 10:47, amara

Right here http://www.meloidae.com/thumbnails.php?alb...97&lang=english
there are a couple of pictures of Monopushis punctumalbum .
Likes: 1

12.11.2007 10:51, Bad Den

Right here http://www.meloidae.com/thumbnails.php?alb...97&lang=english
there are a couple of pictures of Monopushis punctumalbum .

I saw them. Including because of the photo and doubted...

12.11.2007 10:59, amara

Does your beetle really only have one claw on its legs?
If so, then we can assume that the white cheshuyki spots are completely erased.

This post was edited by amara - 11/12/2007 11: 02
Likes: 1

12.11.2007 11:01, Bad Den

Yes, exactly 1 claw (of course 2 claws, but they fused smile.giftogether)

12.11.2007 11:37, amara

In two of your photos, I noticed the remains of some yellow stripes in the grooves on the right nadkr.
If these are yellow scales, then this form is described in Reitter (1916, vol. 5 , p. 181) as a. interponens Schltze (of course, if you trust my knowledge of German). And this would also indicate that the beetle is worn from above.
Likes: 1

12.11.2007 17:08, amara

"It's embarrassing that I don't go out on this kind of" green"in any way - there are no zaglaznychny prsp blades."

Regarding "green": paragraph 133 (p. 500) is in clear contradiction with paragraph 166 (p.501). So you are fine with the definition.
Likes: 2

12.11.2007 22:51, omar

Bravo, amara! I haven't reached this group yet. frown.gif
Likes: 1

Pages: 1 ...49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57... 854

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.