Insecta.pro → Catalog Gallery Taxonomy References Maps Community More

✖

Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Community and Forum → Insects identification → Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Pages: 1 ...64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72... 854

14.03.2008 18:05, rpanin

My first impression is that 1 and 7 can be Europhilus, but the first in my opinion is not fuliginosum, that 1st part of the mustache. and nakr should be lighter than the prsp and head. And number 10 is somewhat similar, but I don't know.

And the third and seventh (7)) are not the same species .In my opinion, one .Just a male and a female.
(Please excuse the wrong numerology)

This post was edited by rpanin - 03/14/2008 18: 05

14.03.2008 18:21, amara

And the third and seventh (7)) are not the same species .In my opinion, one .Just a male and a female.
(Please excuse the wrong numerology)

To do this, you need to clearly see the shape of the back (an important sign) of both beetles in the same plane. Here's a look here:
http://www.coleo-net.de/coleo/texte/europhilus.htm

Likes: 1

14.03.2008 18:32, amara

Well, with a size of 9 mm (and then the maximum) maybe only this type of A. Eu. thoreyi. Check (three, not two grooves on the front and hind legs).
That leaves number 1.

This post was edited by amara - 03/14/2008 18: 37

14.03.2008 18:42, rpanin

Well, with a size of 9 mm (and then the maximum) maybe only this type of A. Eu. thoreyi. Check (three, not two grooves on the front and hind legs).
That leaves number 1.

The size is correct . I approach it meticulously.

14.03.2008 18:47, amara

The size is correct . I approach it meticulously.

Well, I was just thinking of asking, and you already answered

.
Try to compare with the photo, especially the prsp form, on the given site, there are all Central European species of this subgenus.

Likes: 1

14.03.2008 19:22, amara

Please tell me, and the first posterior grooves on the prsr are not dotted (I do not see), and the pubescence of the 3rd part of the antennae does not begin in the last third as it is in the antennarium (the rest with the saredina of the segment, and there is no dotted line)?

14.03.2008 20:31, stierlyz

to Mems-right Bembidion (Peryphus) sp.

14.03.2008 21:40, Guest

Please tell me, and the first posterior grooves on the prsr are not dotted (I do not see), and the pubescence of the 3rd part of the antennae does not begin in the last third as it is in the antennarium (the rest with the saredina of the segment, and there is no dotted line)?

Tomorrow I will be sober ,I will look

Likes: 1

14.03.2008 22:20, Bad Den

Help me figure out - is this Mallosia interrupta or Mallosia scovitzi tristis ?
(Azerbaijan: Talish, Zuvand, Gosmalyan; 15-20. V. 2001)
user posted image

This post was edited by Bad Den-08.04.2018 20: 13

15.03.2008 0:59, Fornax13

Donus of course.

Here was a suspicion, because the size and asked

There is hardly a large selection of them.

15.03.2008 1:15, Fornax13

9-10 mm? Are you sure this is Europhilus? Can't be Platynus livens?
And where does Pterostichus come from?

Likes: 1

15.03.2008 9:07, RippeR

caught it on a poplar stump a couple of weeks ago.

Pictures:
picture: DSC03670.JPG

DSC03670.JPG — (26.38к)

15.03.2008 10:02, Dmitry Vlasov

2Ripper
is an interesting bug!!! And the dimensions?

15.03.2008 10:08, Mylabris

The formula of the legs is not 5-5-4? She reminded me of chernotelka, from bolitofagin...

Likes: 1

15.03.2008 10:22, amara

9-10 mm? Are you sure this is Europhilus? Can't be Platynus livens?

You are right, it may well be, I do not know from which segment the antennae are pubescent (I do not see them from the photo).

This post was edited by amara - 03/15/2008 10: 26

15.03.2008 11:13, guest: rpanin

You are right, it may well be, I do not know from which segment the antennae are pubescent (I do not see them from the photo).

I took a closer look, from the fourth .
All beetles from Lviv region. Swampy forest.

15.03.2008 11:21, guest: rpanin

I took a closer look, from the fourth .
All beetles from the Lviv region. Swampy forest.

The first number has pubescence from the third segment.

15.03.2008 11:44, rpanin

The first number has pubescence from the third segment.

Sorry, since two-thirty.(For the first one) Everyone else seems to have had it since the fourth.
Yeah, this group is a little dark

This post was edited by rpanin - 03/15/2008 11: 45

15.03.2008 12:03, stierlyz

Agonum sensu lato is one of the few genera for which b. m. is suitable volume 2. They also praised the table in Die Kaefer.

15.03.2008 12:29, amara

I took a closer look, from the fourth .

So Fornax13 was right with the third and seventh.

15.03.2008 12:32, amara

Sorry, since two-thirty.(For the first one) Everyone else seems to have had it since the fourth.
Yeah, this group is a little dark

So not antennarium, but some other species of this subgenus Europhilus.

15.03.2008 12:40, amara

Agonum sensu lato is one of the few genera for which b. m. is suitable volume 2.

In general, I agree, only for the subgenus Europhilus, the tables turn out to be, in any case, difficult for me. Especially with the application of the nature of microsculpture.
I liked it better in the Beetles of DV, but we must remember that there are no one or two European species there.

15.03.2008 12:44, PG18

Please help with the definition:

picture: DSC_0176_E_burg_IV_28.jpg

1. April, Yekaterinburg

picture: DSC_0224_E_burg_IV_28.jpg

2. April, Yekaterinburg

picture: DSC_0586_______0.jpg

3. May, upper reaches of the Ural River

picture: Colosoma_DSC_1044________.jpg

4. June, east of the Orenburg region

picture: DSC_0545_______0.jpg

5. May, upper reaches of the Ural River

picture: Coccinellidae_DSC_0520_______0.jpg

6. May, upper reaches of the Ural River

picture: Coccinellidae_DSC_0226_Snezinsk_04_07.jpg

7. April, Yekaterinburg

picture: Cetosia_DSCN0083.jpg

8. June, Orenburg region

picture: DSCN0036.jpg

9. June, Orenburg region

15.03.2008 12:53, Bad Den

Is it Callisthenes kushakewitschi, or someone else?
Kirghizia, Chon-Aryk; 23. V. 1998.
I think I got it from Kryzhanovsky (1962), but I'm not sure...

15.03.2008 15:38, Victor Titov

Please help with the definition:

1- Quedius? Philonthus?
4- Calosoma sp.
5- Trox sp.

Likes: 1

15.03.2008 15:57, barry

Please help me determine:
9. June, Orenburg region

9-Similar to Mycteridae: Mycterus tibialis.
The Zinovites determined me:
http://barry.fotopage.ru/gallery/index.php?category=416

Likes: 1

15.03.2008 20:23, RippeR

Elizar:
almost 5 mm
Mylabris:
I can't see the formula because I don't have a binocular

15.03.2008 22:11, Musson max

Dear forumchane, and again good day, and again I'm with a Monochrome to you. They are chasing me this year

- the second beetle of the season, as it is still a bit cold

, and the second monohamus

I think it's now a female Monochamus sutor, am I right?

Kiev; March 11, 2008. ; in an apartment; presumably from branches imported from the forest. 17 mm.
picture: Monochamus_sutor__female______.jpg

picture: Monochamus_sutor__female______.jpg

15.03.2008 23:08, Victor Titov

Dear forumchane, and again good day, and again I'm with a Monochrome to you. They are chasing me this year - the second beetle of the season, as it is still a bit cold, and the second monohamus
I think it's now a female Monochamus sutor, am I right?

Kiev; March 11, 2008. ; in an apartment; presumably from branches imported from the forest. 17 mm.

No, this is a girl Monochamus galloprovincialis Olivier, 1795.

Likes: 1

15.03.2008 23:29, guest: rpanin

No, this is a girl Monochamus galloprovincialis Olivier, 1795.

It may also be Monochamus galloprovincialis pistor (Germar, 1818).
Although I don't know exactly how they differ ?

Likes: 1

15.03.2008 23:33, Victor Titov

It may also be Monochamus galloprovincialis pistor (Germar, 1818).
Although I don't know exactly how they differ ?

Maybe. I was too quick with the subspecies

. I don't even know how they differ. But that M. galloprovincialis-that's for sure!

Likes: 2

16.03.2008 1:26, Fornax13

1 - Philonthus sp.
2 - ? as a variant of Harpalus calceatus (Duft.)
3-for me, Pterostichus mannerheimi Dej.
4-Calosoma, but here's what...
5-Trox, M. B. cadaverinus Ill.
7-Ha my view-Harmonia, M. B. quadripunctata (Pont.)
8-Epicometis hirta (Poda)
9-Mycterus, I don't really understand them.

Likes: 1

16.03.2008 1:33, Fornax13

Elizar:
Almost 5 mm
Mylabris:
I can't see the formula because I don't have binoculars

Not, if you look closely, z. legs 5-chl. Not a darkling.
In the order of delirium-Agyrtes castaneus (F.) from Agyrtidae. I never saw them in my life

This post was edited by Fornax13-03/16/2008 01: 45

Likes: 1

16.03.2008 1:39, Fornax13

I took a closer look, from the fourth .
All beetles from the Lviv region. Swampy forest.

In principle, their very biotope. livens, I mean. Only prsp. shirokovata still. And the pterostichus looks like a nigrita, if I remember correctly. It is unlikely that something will come from Petrophilus. Although...

Likes: 1

16.03.2008 1:47, Victor Titov

Not, if you look closely, z. legs 5-chl. Not a darkling.

Well, that's how you look at it... I've enlarged the left hind leg of the bug exposed by RippeR, and it seems that 4 segments are visible, unless the very first one is shortened
picture: post_11246_1205561127.jpg

And anyway, what does the binocular have to do with it? In a beetle with a size of almost 5 mm, the number of segments in the legs can be counted using a manual magnifying glass with a multiplicity of 7 to 20 commercials.

This post was edited by Dmitrich - 03/16/2008 01: 48

Likes: 1

16.03.2008 1:59, Fornax13

And if the right one?

16.03.2008 2:10, Bad Den

In the order of delirium-Agyrtes castaneus (F.) from Agyrtidae. I never saw them in my life

"Even if it's a crazy idea, don't cut it in the heat of the moment..."

In my opinion, it is very suitable for the description of Agyrtes castaneus from "green".

Likes: 1

16.03.2008 2:17, Fornax13

Yes and similar to the picture from Mrochkovsky seemed

Likes: 1

16.03.2008 2:27, Victor Titov

And if the right one?

You are welcome! Only it didn't get any easier. It seems that his feet are simply "not washed", plastered with a substrate.
picture: post_11246_1205561127__1_.jpg

This post was edited by Dmitrich - 03/16/2008 02: 27

Likes: 1

16.03.2008 2:51, Victor Titov

I don't know, I don't know. It may very well be that this is Agyrtes castaneus. I only saw it in the drawings, I couldn't Google the photo.
http://www.coleo-net.de/coleo/bilder/agyrt...staneus_rtt.gif

Likes: 1

Pages: 1 ...64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72... 854

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

News

17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
11.11.2024: The Community/Forum section has become more convenient
11.11.2024: Improved scaling of images in the Forum/Community