Insecta.pro → Catalog Gallery Taxonomy References Maps Community More

✖

Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Community and Forum → Insects identification → Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Pages: 1 ...60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68... 854

03.02.2008 4:01, barry

No one can tell you whose larva it is?

I think it's some kind of leaf eater... but which one?
(photographed in Moscow)

In the macro club recently ran someone similar:
http://macroclub.ru/glr/displayimage.php?pos=-17002
It might help...

03.02.2008 9:29, amara

In the macro club recently ran someone similar:
http://macroclub.ru/glr/displayimage.php?pos=-17002Sooooooo help...

It shows a photo of the beetle Hispa testacea, and here I also first thought that it could be a larva from the same genus, Hispa, only a different species atra L., but then I read that their larvae develop in mines, in leaves. So now I don't know what it is at all.

This post was edited by amara - 02/03/2008 10: 02

03.02.2008 19:38, KDG

By the way, where can I find normal tables for them?

This is bad. However, try to find this one: GILMOUR E. Forrest 1948. Revision of the Batocerini Spolia Zeylanica, 25(1): 1-121, pls. 1-10.
И эти: Gilmour E.F. 1963. Revision of the Batocerini. (Genera Doesburgia, Aprionella, Microcriodes, Pseudapriona, Parapriona and Anapriona) // Entomologische Abhandlungen Mus. Tierk. Dresden , 29(7):475-491.
HLAVEK Robert 2001, 57(2): 65-79, L'Entomologiste - Complements aux travaux de Renaud Paulian sur les relations allometriques: application a la systematique du genere Batocera (Col., Cerambycidae, Lamiinae, Batocerini).
RIGOUT J. 1981, pp. 1-121, illustr., Sciences Nat, Compiegne - The beetles of the world. Volume 1. Batocerini, 1.: Batocera
Things are definitely outdated, but still-tkai... From the new one, there are only some types in the regional qualifiers.

Likes: 2

03.02.2008 19:44, KDG

Yeah, I looked at these guys:
http://www.padil.gov.au/viewPestDiagnosticImages.aspx?id=963
http://www.thebugmaniac.be/alainimages/bee...ocera_Rubus.jpg
http://www.coleop-terra.com/batoceraIIoverview.html
and a number of other sites, and I came to the conclusion that with such variability, these Batocera images are difficult to determine from the image to the view... Although I'm leaning towards rubus, but...

Here, here.. But you can also use the image if you know the group well or are closely involved in the fauna of the region. And I have these fat creatures only 2 pieces...

Likes: 1

04.02.2008 0:42, Bad Den

I'll also post a few barbels:
1. Tanzania, Udzungwa Mountains, December 2007-January 2008
60 mm long
user posted image

2. This and subsequent events-Israel, Haifa, June-July 2007
user posted image

04.02.2008 1:41, KDG

I'll post some barbels too:

1. Tithoes (Tithoes) confinis Laporte de Castelnau, 1840
2.Hesperophanes sericeus (Fabricius, 1787)
3-4. Stromatium unicolor (Olivier, 1795) malefemale
Are there no purpuricenes from Israel?

Likes: 1

04.02.2008 7:36, Bad Den

1. Tithoes (Tithoes) confinis Laporte de Castelnau, 1840
2.Hesperophanes sericeus (Fabricius, 1787)
3-4. Stromatium unicolor (Olivier, 1795) malefemale
Are there no purpuricenes from Israel?

Thanks!
Alas, there are no purpuricenes.

05.02.2008 11:50, treator

the first two samples were found in a glass of beer, the last of which was found in Victory Park under a stone

Pictures:
picture: image1.jpg

image1.jpg — (120.32к)

picture: image2.jpg

image2.jpg — (142.12к)

picture: krim1.jpg

krim1.jpg — (149.9к)

05.02.2008 11:57, Bad Den

image1.jpg — something like Platynus longiventris, IMHO
image2.jpg -Poecilus sp.
Crimean harpalina for the first time I see

Likes: 1

05.02.2008 12:38, omar

1 Agonum assimile
2. Poecilus sp.
3. Acinopus sp.

Likes: 2

05.02.2008 17:24, Victor Titov

05.02.2008 19:29, Bad Den

Some more barbels from Tanzania (+ blackbody):
1. 15 mm
user posted image

2. 27 mm

3. 29 mm

4.? Cymatura sp. (30 mm)
user posted image

5. Eleanor medici ? (19 mm)
user posted image

5. Tragocephala formosa ? (19 mm)
user posted image

6. Zographus aulicus ? (37 mm)
user posted image

7. And chernotelka...

Likes: 1

06.02.2008 8:48, treator

Sorry I'll fix

06.02.2008 20:42, Bad Den

And, as they say, not to get up 2 times...

Also Tanzania
1. Nutcracker, I suspect what ? Tetralobus stuckhardi (51 mm)
user posted image

2. Barbel, 13 mm, apparently purpuritsen some?

06.02.2008 21:51, KDG

Likes: 1

07.02.2008 0:52, Bad Den

It's listed like this. Chernotelka-Amarygmini Tribe. Look for the view yourself.

Thanks!
I forgot to write-chernotelka 25 mm in length.

07.02.2008 10:01, KDG

[quote=Bad Den,07.02.2008 00:52]

Likes: 1

07.02.2008 10:35, Bad Den

Thanks!
I forgot to write-chernotelka 25 mm in length.

I was prompted with an approximate list of genera where you can search for this animal: Hoplonyx, Gonocnemis,
Eupezus, Nuramagoodmisu Good
luck

They said-Eupezus sp.

This post was edited by Bad Den - 07.02.2008 10: 37

Likes: 1

10.02.2008 22:03, Bad Den

It is believed that this is Monochamus leuconotus Pascoe, 1869...

11.02.2008 9:30, KDG

It is believed that this is Monochamus leuconotus Pascoe, 1869...

I had such an idea, but for some reason I decided not to rush...
It won't be a big sin to write

like this

Likes: 1

13.02.2008 14:51, Трофим

Is this Pogonocherus fasciculatus? Kishinev08. 03. 2007 on a pine tree. On the top of the elytra, there are no denticles at all. And then at first I thought that something from hispidus, or hispidulus

Pictures:
picture: S7304865.JPG

S7304865.JPG — (93.72к)

13.02.2008 14:53, Трофим

Narrowwing or barbel? To be honest, I don't quite understand what a mustache is attached to the forehead, I looked at several barbels under a microscope, such as this instance, so I give another increase on the head.

Pictures:
picture: S7304871.JPG

S7304871.JPG — (113.54к)

picture: S7304873.JPG

S7304873.JPG — (118.26к)

13.02.2008 15:35, Victor Titov

13.02.2008 15:39, Трофим

Maybe one of the Callimuses?

13.02.2008 15:52, amara

13.02.2008 15:55, Bad Den

In my opinion - also a mustache

13.02.2008 15:59, Aleksandr Safronov

Definitely a barbel. I think it is Callimoxys gracilis (Brulle, 1832) .

13.02.2008 16:20, Aleksandr Safronov

And Pogonocherus (in my opinion) Pogonocherus (Pityphilus) decoratus Fairm., 1855.

13.02.2008 17:01, Victor Titov

I agree with P. decoratus.

13.02.2008 19:23, Cerambyx

Barbel-Chisinau, 08.03.2007-Pogonocherus fasciculatus of course (decoratus has the simplest difference - the dark band on the elytra is noticeably slanted back to the seam). The second beetle is indeed a barbel, and indeed Callimoxys gracilis.

Likes: 2

13.02.2008 21:34, KDG

It's always like this - you look in, and then everything is already determined differently..[slams the door viciously and leaves]

13.02.2008 21:42, Bad Den

It's always like this - you look in, and then everything is already determined differently..[slams the door angrily and leaves]

Don't worry, Doctor, I'll give you another one soon

13.02.2008 22:39, Aleksandr Safronov

I'll also ask the barbel specialists.
What kind of Dorcadion could it be? Shabby, of course, well, it was in August.
Central Bulgaria, Stara Zagora district, Stara Planina, Shipka Mountain.
16.08.2005

Pictures:
picture: Dorcadion_sp.jpg

Dorcadion_sp.jpg — (87.08к)

15.02.2008 10:20, Bad Den

15.02.2008 16:19, KDG

Likes: 1

15.02.2008 18:25, Трофим

For those who are desperate that there is nothing to determine.

Question on three phytoecia. All three pustules? The third copy is doubtful. The spot on the pronotum can certainly not be called flat, and even more so round, but this specimen. clearly different from the previous 2.
1ex. 6,5 mm
2 copies. 6 mm
3 copies. 7mm + it is wider and the spot on the pronotum itself is much larger. Could it be virgula?

Pictures:
picture: 2__________1.JPG

2__________1.JPG — (95.15к)

picture: 3___________2.JPG

3___________2.JPG — (105.46 k)

picture: 4___________3.JPG

4___________3.JPG — (112.74 k)

15.02.2008 18:27, Трофим

Are these both icterics?

Pictures:
picture: 5_________.JPG

5_________.JPG — (139.41 k)

picture: 6_________.JPG

6_________.JPG — (135.52 k)

15.02.2008 18:29, Трофим

What kind of
phytoecia Was determined by Bey-Bienko
So in order. Head and fart spot with light hair bands, no spot, there is a median strip in the determinant (24)., the abdomen is unicolored (26) Definitely not icteric. But how many did not look at the rear basins. Basins are like basins, nothing special. There is no prong. If you do not take the prong into account, then the first one looks like a cylinder, and the second one looks like a nigricornis. Or I didn't define it correctly. Help who knows.

Pictures:
picture: 7_________________________.JPG

7_________________________.JPG — (157.35 k)

15.02.2008 18:31, Трофим

And one more question, well, it will be much easier here.
You can use barbels in order. I want to rearrange it to know exactly where the same types are, and what can be broken to throw out. Another question is whether the far left from the bottom is arhopalus rusticus or another species. Caught in Ukraine.

Pictures:
picture: 1_____________.JPG

1_____________.JPG — (145.32 k)

15.02.2008 18:36, Трофим

I wrote it in Ukraine because I remembered Zadornov. In general, as it is correct, in Ukraine or on, I am more inclined to the option in Ukraine. Apo Russian as correct?

Pages: 1 ...60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68... 854

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

News

17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
11.11.2024: The Community/Forum section has become more convenient
11.11.2024: Improved scaling of images in the Forum/Community