Insecta.pro → Catalog Gallery Taxonomy References Maps Community More

✖

Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Community and Forum → Insects identification → Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Pages: 1 ...58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66... 854

12.01.2008 19:45, Cerambyx

Do you know such a "beast"?
Size 9-10mm, caught: Orenburg region. Virgin steppe. 16.05.92, Nemkov V. A.

Does your D. elegans have a dot specified? I didn't sit down by accident. Earlier?

13.01.2008 14:13, Nikolaj Pichugin

Does your D. elegans have a dot specified? I didn't sit down by accident. Earlier?

Unfortunately, I don't have any more information. This beetle was sent more than 10 years ago, and communication with Nemkov V. A. was interrupted.

13.01.2008 18:19, Cerambyx

It's clear. But, by the way, communication with Nemkov is not a problem to restore, if anything... I met him just the day before yesterday. Then I'll check with him.

This post was edited by Cerambyx - 13.01.2008 18: 21

13.01.2008 22:30, Nikolaj Pichugin

It's clear. But, by the way, communication with Nemkov is not a problem to restore, if anything... I met him just the day before yesterday. Then I'll check with him.

Thank you, and give him my big regards.

16.01.2008 11:09, Alexandr Rusinov

Please help me identify the horses. Horse 1. Turkmenistan, Sumbar River valley, Saardash level
picture: _______1.jpg

Skakun 2. West Turkmenistan
picture: _______2.jpg

Skakun 3. Kuibyshev reservoir, mouth of the river.Vetluga In" green " is defined as maritima, but I am confused by the wide white pattern.
picture: _______3.jpg

Likes: 1

16.01.2008 20:29, quadryquadratus

Please help me identify the horses. Horse 1. Turkmenistan, Sumbar River valley, Saardash level

Skakun 2. West Turkmenistan

Skakun 3. Kuibyshev reservoir, mouth of the river.Vetluga In" green " is defined as maritima, but I am confused by the wide white pattern.

The third - maritima, still would look at the mandibles (not visible in the photo), - if it's thin (compared to the interweek), then it's definitely him. And the pattern is usually even more pronounced (here the plume on the sling is not particularly large).

16.01.2008 20:49, Nikolaj Pichugin

The first, in my opinion, is Cicindela decempustulata Men.
The second one is similar to Cicindela fischeri Ad.

16.01.2008 21:15, Cerambyx

The first, in my opinion, is Cicindela decempustulata Men.
The second is similar to Cicindela fischeri Ad.

Absolutely agree, this is C. decempustulata and C. fischeri.
The third mount is almost certainly Cicindela sahlbergii. According to the green European part, it is really defined as maritima. You can check - these species are clearly defined by the shape of the top of the aedeagus, and you, as I see it, have a male. Trying to upload an image:

Pictures:
picture: maritima.jpg

maritima.jpg — (2.35к)

picture: sahlbergii.jpg

sahlbergii.jpg — (2.84к)

Likes: 3

16.01.2008 22:04, Cerambyx

Now I looked at my Cicindela-maybe number 3 and maritima... In general, you need to look at the genitals.

17.01.2008 12:14, Alexandr Rusinov

Thank you to everyone who took the time to identify my mounts.

I looked at the top of edagus number 3-it turns out maritima.

17.01.2008 14:59, Alexandr Rusinov

I will ask one more question, maybe someone will tell me. Abscesses from Ethiopia, near the city of Bahardar. It seems to me that this is one species, in the series I have specimens with a transitional color, the size is about 35mm.
picture: _________1.jpg

This post was edited by Anthrenus - 17.01.2008 15: 00

17.01.2008 16:12, guest: VladimirDavydov

Something I don't understand how to insert a picture in soopschenie?

current link to another site =(
Really determine from the photo what kind of animal it is?

17.01.2008 16:21, guest: VladimirDavydov

or rather

17.01.2008 16:43, Dmitry Vlasov

Members of the family Carabidae, engaged in vulgar sex...

17.01.2008 17:23, Bad Den

Something I don't understand how to insert a picture in soopschenie?

17.01.2008 17:57, Cerambyx

I looked at the top of edagus number 3-it turns out to be maritima.

So exactly - maritima, hybrida has a top like sahlbergii with the exception of small details.

17.01.2008 18:56, Victor Titov

Something I don't understand how to insert a picture in soopschenie?

current link to another site =(
Really determine from the photo what kind of animal it is?

I will assume that these are some Harpalus.

17.01.2008 20:16, Mylabris

In my opinion, there are still two supraorbital setae. Pterostichus? About the abscesses: the Mylabrini tribe, that's all I can say from these photos. 2 different species (if not genera).

17.01.2008 21:24, RippeR

according to the groove on the episternae I assume that these are not pterostichae

17.01.2008 22:49, Bad Den

according to the furrow on the episternae I assume that these are not pterostiches

Harpalusy

Likes: 1

18.01.2008 0:37, Fornax13

How do you like the Curtonotus option?

18.01.2008 0:41, Bad Den

How do you like the Curtonotus option?

Similar, but unclear, 1 or 2 setae above the eyes. I (personally) clearly see only 1, which means something from Harpalus'opodobnykh...

This post was edited by Bad Den-18.01.2008 01: 07

Likes: 1

19.01.2008 0:35, Fornax13

I don't remember Harpalus with such points in the grooves...

19.01.2008 2:20, RippeR

at least know where these harpalopodbnye ptirostikhi come from.. and then you never know what where there are.

19.01.2008 11:49, guest: VladimirDavydov

Harpalus from the Yuntolovsky reserve (near St. Petersburg). I was offered H. rufipes here ...

19.01.2008 16:50, Archypus

This is Curtonotus aulicus, other options are not considered,

you can't tell from the picture anyway

This post was edited by Archypus - 20.01.2008 15: 22

20.01.2008 1:23, Fornax13

Rather convexiusculus. But the image is really hard to tell for sure.

20.01.2008 2:34, Victor Titov

This is Curtonotus aulicus, other options are not considered, you can still determine the horseradish from the picture

I still think that Curtonotus has overreacted

. I, like Bad Den, lean towards Harpalus.

20.01.2008 10:42, guest: VladimirDavydov

Vopschem inclined me to Curtonotus aulicus, fsem thank you=)

20.01.2008 13:24, Archypus

convexiusculus is still a more steppe species, and the posterior corners of the pronotum stick out to the sides like in aulicus. But I didn't really try to define it. It's just that these animals most often catch the eye, climbing on different plants in search of food, and often mate there (I don't think they were planted that way on purpose). Harpaluses, if they do climb, are much rarer (I can't immediately name anyone), and I don't remember mating in public at all. By the way, what is the size of these beetles?

Likes: 1

21.01.2008 1:44, Fornax13

convexiusculus is still a more steppe species, and the posterior corners of the pronotum stick out to the sides like in aulicus. But I didn't really try to define it. It's just that these animals most often catch the eye, climbing on different plants in search of food, and often mate there (I don't think they were planted that way on purpose). Harpaluses, if they do climb, are much rarer (I can't immediately name anyone), and I don't remember mating in public at all. By the way, what is the size of these beetles?

Oh, by the way, I would like to clarify the size. Still, I think I'll go with aulicus, too.Steppe Harpalus also walk on cereals (we have politus and fuscipalpis so collected, and in the mass). Only at night. As for the more steppe-I don't know, we have both, in general, everywhere.

21.01.2008 15:03, guest: VladimirDavydov

Size only from memory . I didn't touch them

. Approximately 10mm or slightly larger.

22.01.2008 1:07, Fornax13

What does this" melandriida " mustache look like? And then the photo is not very clear. And whether there is a furrow for inserting the whiskers along the side of the pgr.?

Still, it would be interesting to know. I have one suspicion... In this case, as far as I understand, the view is for the territory of the former. The USSR was not specified.

This post was edited by Fornax13-22.01.2008 01: 08

22.01.2008 1:22, Musson max

Please help me identify beetles from Syria, early May.
73-74, 75-76 (17-19 mm.) photos from above and below. 69 and 72 - sorry for the quality, maybe you can help - (18-22 mm.)
Thank you in advance

Pictures:
picture: DSC_0473.JPG

DSC_0473.JPG — (245.65к)

picture: DSC_0474.JPG

DSC_0474.JPG — (248.17к)

picture: DSC_0475.JPG

DSC_0475.JPG — (147.56к)

picture: DSC_0476.JPG

DSC_0476.JPG — (136.62к)

picture: DSC_0469.JPG

DSC_0469.JPG — (129.53к)

picture: DSC_0472.JPG

DSC_0472.JPG — (137.83к)

22.01.2008 7:47, Bad Den

DSC_0469.JPG, DSC_0472.JPG " the same beetles, I take it?"
I think it's some kind of Adesmia sp.
See more here: http://www.nature-of-oz.com/tenebrionidae.htm
And here: http://jcringenbach.free.fr/website/beetle...idae_llibya.htm

Likes: 1

22.01.2008 16:09, kvetlov

But the weevil
once knew who it
was but forgot
to remind please
user posted image

22.01.2008 18:03, IchMan

So this is a pipefish-Apoderus and sort of like A. longiceps-exotic for us...
And why here, and not in Zhukov?

This post was edited by IchMan - 22.01.2008 18: 04

22.01.2008 18:05, omar

Where did the photo come from? There are a number of species found in Southeast Asia.

22.01.2008 18:17, Victor Titov

But the weevil
once knew who it
was but forgot
to remind me please

Kakoooy trubkovertik! My mouth is watering...

23.01.2008 0:14, RippeR

ahh, aliens!

Pages: 1 ...58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66... 854

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

News

17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
11.11.2024: The Community/Forum section has become more convenient
11.11.2024: Improved scaling of images in the Forum/Community