E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Community and Forum → Insects identification → Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Pages: 1 ...67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75... 854

25.03.2008 10:15, Alexandr Rusinov

No, this is not a perforate, the perforate spots on the elytra are much smaller. I agree with Ripper, this is S. punctata. At the expense of the pentagon, I can't see anything in this photo. smile.gif It is necessary to take a photo of the head more clearly, then it will be possible to determine the type.

This post was edited by Anthrenus - 03/25/2008 10: 21

25.03.2008 10:19, okoem

25.03.2008 10:58, Victor Titov

No, this is not a perforate, the perforate spots on the elytra are much smaller. I agree with Ripper, this is S. punctata.

In deep pardon, I miscalculated redface.gif. I compared it with my copy in the photo at this link, http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtop...=0&#entry592696, and it seemed to me that the okoem creaker also has 5 spots on the elytra in a longitudinal row.

25.03.2008 11:36, rpanin

  For okoem
Beetles from the Crimea.
Ground beetles - in order:
3. Carabus (s.str.) granulatus ssp. granulatus Linné, 1758


3. Carabus (s.str.) granulatus ssp. granulatus crimeensis
Though I do not know its differences.
Likes: 1

25.03.2008 13:08, Aleksandr Safronov

Likes: 2

25.03.2008 15:36, mems

May bug ???

Pictures:
picture: 24_03_08.JPG
24_03_08.JPG — (123.55к)

25.03.2008 15:44, Aleksandr Safronov

Likes: 1

25.03.2008 20:02, okoem

Here are two more May beetles, one June bug, one August bug, and one October bug... ;-)

Pictures:
picture: 20071017_153250.jpg
20071017_153250.jpg — (56.87к)

picture: 20070805_152756.jpg
20070805_152756.jpg — (26.77к)

picture: 20070517_135500.jpg
20070517_135500.jpg — (39.04к)

picture: 20070609_092902.jpg
20070609_092902.jpg — (37.25к)

picture: 20070505_095422.jpg
20070505_095422.jpg — (42.37к)

Likes: 4

25.03.2008 22:36, RippeR

Cetonia aurata
Oxythirea funesta
O. I would also say funesta, but it doesn't sound very similar.. If there are other species in Crimea..
Potosia cuprea
P. hungarica

as for the granulatus-I thought it was a subspecies myself - the beetle is too "thin" and the elytra have a strange sculpture, it differs both in bulges and color from standard granulatus..
Likes: 1

25.03.2008 23:06, okoem

26.03.2008 0:14, RippeR

she is

26.03.2008 0:53, RippeR

Ukraine, Dnipropetrovsk region, Pavlograd district, Bulakhovka village district. May 2007. C. Dementiev
I assumed that proskarabeyus, but the beetle somehow looks strange-maybe something else?

Pictures:
picture: maika.jpg
maika.jpg — (141.93к)

26.03.2008 1:19, Fornax13

Cetonia aurata
Oxythirea funesta
O. I would also say funesta, but it doesn't sound very similar.. If there are other species in Crimea..


And for me-so both - not funesta. Bald too and with a border on the prsp. Oxythyrea cinctella any..
Likes: 1

26.03.2008 6:08, Mylabris

Like a normal female proscarabeus... What exactly confused you, Ripper?

26.03.2008 11:41, RippeR

his wrinkled appearance and mustache seemed odd.. but these are my fantasies. proscarabeus smile.gif

26.03.2008 13:47, Bad Den

And for me-so both - not funesta. Bald too and with a border on the prsp. Oxythyrea cinctella any..

In the Crimea, like only funesta can be?

This post was edited by Bad Den - 03/26/2008 13: 48

26.03.2008 14:03, treator

confused.gif

Pictures:
picture: rhagij1.jpg
rhagij1.jpg — (141.63к)

26.03.2008 14:11, okoem

In the Crimea, like only funesta can be?

Yes, I Googled it - it looks like the second photo is really Oxythyrea cinctella.

26.03.2008 14:17, amara

Yes, I Googled it - it looks like the second photo is really Oxythyrea cinctella.


Here is a table with pictures (not only for albopicta):
http://www.coleo-net.de/coleo/texte/oxythyrea.htm

This post was edited by amara - 03/26/2008 14: 18
Likes: 4

26.03.2008 14:49, Victor Titov

  confused.gif

Rhagium inquisitor (L., 1758)
Likes: 1

26.03.2008 16:54, PG18

Then Mylabris:
Sergey, I want to sort out everything with my last year's Milabris. And what if you count the three orange beetles in this picture as M. variabilis, and leave the three red ones (which are poorly visible from above) as a quadripoint?)) Taken in the eastern part of the Orenburg region.
картинка: Meloidae_Mylabris_variabilis___M_quadripunctata_0045________.jpg

And once again take a look at this shot from the forest-steppe zone of the Chelyabinsk region.
картинка: Meloidae_Mylabris_sibirica_____geminata__DSC_0227_______copy.jpg
Agree that, taking into account the locale, this handsome man should be called Mylabris sibirica, and not M. gemminata (as you once suggested to me), which seems to be absent in the Urals... It seems that sibirica is the only species of the genus that enters our subtaiga, since exactly the same beetle is in the collection of Ierizh ash from the Sverdlovsk region (Sysert region). Or am I wrong?

And also, Sergey, can I still buy your book in paper form? Now I want to get to south-west Kazakhstan... Very, I think, useful)

26.03.2008 17:41, Mylabris

To PG18:
1. Let's assume this: (see photo).
2. sibirica without a doubt.
3. the whole book was disassembled (I myself have 1 copy leftfrown.gif). That's why I posted it in the ZIN - so that the people would get it. We don't plan to reissue it yet...

26.03.2008 17:42, Mylabris

To PG18:
1. Let's assume this: (see photo).
2. sibirica without a doubt.
3. the whole book was disassembled (I myself have 1 copy leftfrown.gif). That's why I posted it in the ZIN - so that the people would get it. We don't plan to reissue it yet...

Pictures:
picture: post.jpg
post.jpg — (84.52к)

Likes: 1

26.03.2008 19:56, PG18

Thank you.
  
3. the whole book was disassembled (I myself have 1 copy leftfrown.gif). That's why I posted it in the ZIN - so that the people would get it. We don't plan to reissue it yet...

Sorry. Maybe they made a mistake with the print run?.. Now it's probably time to start cooking a new one. Such fun beetles must be shown in color. And with biotopes would...
And there would also be fewer blunders, such as " In Kazakhstan, in the southern part of the republic from the Urals to Zaisan "(pages 52, 68, 72, 78...)...:-) I saw this today while trying to estimate the approximate number of species in the southern Urals.

26.03.2008 21:45, Mylabris

it meant this:

Pictures:
picture: ____________.jpg
____________.jpg — (139.54к)

Likes: 1

26.03.2008 21:57, PG18

This is understandable (and the Turanian fauna dominates in red). It was just worth saying "from the Caspian Sea to the Balkhash region". Neither the Urals nor Zaisan, you know, have anything to do with the south of Kazakhstan)
But these are small things, of course. The book is cool, it's a pity not to put it on the shelf...
Likes: 1

27.03.2008 12:01, treator

wall.gif

Pictures:
picture: cer5.jpg
cer5.jpg — (129.2к)

picture: cer6.jpg
cer6.jpg — (120.19к)

picture: cer7_1.jpg
cer7_1.jpg — (109.08к)

picture: cer7_2.jpg
cer7_2.jpg — (117.83к)

27.03.2008 13:59, Victor Titov

For treator: First beetle-Donacia sp. (Chrysomelidae: Donaciinae)

27.03.2008 14:02, Nimrod

I've reviewed your Hoplia, Mr. RippeR. Both species belong to the subgenus Decamera (easily identified by the number of segments. This subgenus has a 10-jointed club). I'll describe the types later. There's something I need to see."
"khrushchik from the Irkutsk region." it may well be Omaloplia hirta. Keep in mind that species belonging to the Sericini tribe, except for individual representatives, cannot be identified from the photo.[/b]

Now it's yours, Mr. okoem.
Likes: 4

27.03.2008 14:02, Mylabris

I'm afraid to make a mistake, but I'll assume that the second nitidulidka (Librodor?)
Likes: 1

27.03.2008 14:19, Alexandr Rusinov

Perhaps Librodor grendis Tourn. ?
Likes: 1

27.03.2008 14:22, Bad Den

cer7_1.jpg and the next one (aka, I understand it) is sort of like Dromius sp.
Likes: 1

27.03.2008 16:10, Dmitry Vlasov

No, guys, the second beetle in the Treator, a glisten is either Ipidia binotata Rtt, or Glischrochilus quadripunctatus. The punctuation of the elytra is unclear, if very sharp (striated) then the first, if weak-the second.
Likes: 1

27.03.2008 18:22, Victor Titov

On Ipidia binotata spangle treater is not very similar. Rather, after all, Glischrochilus. And the ground beetle is really Dromius-shaped.
Likes: 1

27.03.2008 22:08, okoem

I photographed five beetles today. All small ones. T-shirt (very fast running) and staphylin no more than 15 mm, the rest even smaller.

Pictures:
picture: 20080327_095642.jpg
20080327_095642.jpg — (48.16к)

picture: 20080327_104516.jpg
20080327_104516.jpg — (36.57к)

picture: 20080327_131821.jpg
20080327_131821.jpg — (63.09к)

picture: 20080327_132751.jpg
20080327_132751.jpg — (36.75к)

picture: 20080327_133742.jpg
20080327_133742.jpg — (38.34к)

Likes: 4

27.03.2008 23:52, RippeR

staff Ocypus, more specifically to Stirlitz..
mike, it looks like uralensis
barbel, but damn it, in my opinion lucky to meet such a Cardoria scutellata Probably released? frown.gif
the beetle is cool, I have not seen such, respectively, I do not know what to call it, and I do not remember the genus of the weevil, this Lobster will tell us smile.gif
Likes: 1

28.03.2008 0:05, Fornax13

The beetle is Gynandromorphus etruscus (Quens.), I think.
And the weevil is some kind of legume Hypera. m. b. suspiciosa (Herbst)
Likes: 2

28.03.2008 0:17, Fornax13

Colleagues, do not tell me to sort at least. Baskunchak, Astrakhan region.
1 - some kind of dazitida, most likely.
2-probably holevina, but very perverse.

This post was edited by Fornax13-28.03.2008 00: 18

Pictures:
picture: P3230034.JPG
P3230034.JPG — (120.35к)

picture: P3230038.JPG
P3230038.JPG — (137.58к)

28.03.2008 15:55, omar

Hypera is very grated on top, so most likely it will not come out before the view. But I can assume that contaminata.

29.03.2008 0:41, Fornax13

Is it grated? It's more like her drawing is like this.
H. contaminata without a scapular spot, wider, with a fine-spotted pattern.

Pages: 1 ...67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75... 854

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.