Identification of Lepidoptera (Butterflies and Moths)

Caterpillar-
Cucullia lucifuga ([Denis & Schiffermüller], 1775), cf. Leps.it
Feed (by Leps.it): Sonchus, Prenanthes, Tragopogon, Taraxacum, Picris, Hieracium
According to Lampert's atlas-carrot, sow thistle, skewbill.

Pyadenitsa is possible (cf. from the photo on Leps.it
Eupithecia abbreviata (Stephens, 1831)

I will add that Cucullia lucifuga is quite a Moscow region species. Rare

By the way, the cowl will not devour the raspberry cocoonworm when it grows up?

By the way, the cowl will not devour the raspberry cocoonworm when it grows up?

Hmm. Maybe it won't eat you...

Right now the hood is twice as long... And thinner... And too small...

It looks like it's also a crested bird. Filmed in the Moscow region last summer. It would be interesting to know what kind of view:

Spilosoma lubricipeda!

Is it Calamatropha paludella or Chilo phragmitellus?

Is it Calamatropha paludella or Chilo phragmitellus?

Calamatropha paludella. Chilo phragmitellus has sharper forewings and is more yellow.

1-Agrotis ipsilon, sort of.
2 - ?Amphipyra sp. The shape seems to fit - but nothing else is visible...
3 - Caradrina ?clavipalpis
4 and 5-Agrotis segetum
6 - Dichagyris (Heliophobus) reticulata

Actually, I mine 5 and 6 Tholera cespitis and decimalis respectively

Cucullia lucifuga I came across in August in the Leninsky district of the Moscow region. I thought it was mnemosyne.

First of all, I also thought -*, this is Parnassius! Then I come from the dacha, climb on leps.it, and there it turns out they have 2 rows of spots!
-----------------------------------
In my opinion, 4-winter wheat, 5-Tholera cespitis, but how about 6?!

This post was edited by Ilya U - 08/20/2007 11: 20

And #6 - Tholera decimalis, I support svm2.

Offtopcheg.
To kotbegemot: Did you celebrate the 185th anniversary of Henry Stainton's birth on August 13?

This post was edited by Dr. Niko - 08/20/2007 16: 21

And #6 - Tholera decimalis, I support svm2.

Yes, you're right.

Offtopcheg.
To kotbegemot: Did you celebrate the 185th anniversary of Henry Stainton's birth on August 13?

Wow, I didn't know!

Catocala sponsa L. 1767 ?

Heh, but I remember that katokala is almost like you-I took a picture on August 19. Only in 2003. So apparently this is their 1st generation or am I wildly mistaken again?

Catocala sponsa L. 1767 ?

In my opinion, it is the most

Heh, but I remember that katokala is almost like you-I took a picture on August 19. Only in 2003. So apparently this is their 1st generation or am I wildly mistaken again?

As far as I know, all tapeworms have only one generation per year. Not around here, anyway.

one, only stretched all the way to fall

Help identify the butterflies! I apologize for the quality, the images were taken in a hurry from the prints. Thank you in advance.

Pictures:

P8227189.JPG — (377.42к)


P8227199.JPG — (418.77к)

Help identify the butterflies! I apologize for the quality, the images were taken in a hurry from the prints. Thank you in advance.

1 - ?Micropterix sp.
2 - Euclidia glyphica

Naschelkal today little things on the oak tree alone Help at least determine the parent...

Pictures:

n0708231.jpg — (161.5к)


n0708232.jpg — (150.03к)


n0708233.jpg — (144.57к)


n0708234.jpg — (160.97к)

Vietnam, Hanoi 10.04.85

Pictures:

hp.JPG — (67.85к)

Naschelkal today little things on the oak tree alone Help at least determine the parent...

The leaf wrapper on the first one is some kind of Epinotia sp. or something like that. And the rest, like, from vymchatoprytykh - and this for me while the forest is dark

The leaf wrapper on the first one is some kind of Epinotia sp. or something like that. And the rest, like, from vymchatoptera - and this is still a dark forest for me

Thanks for that too! I try not to take pictures of things that are difficult to define, but I couldn't resist...

Thanks for that too! I try not to take pictures of things that are difficult to define, but I couldn't resist...

By the way, this little thing came out very cool, you can definitely determine if you know them.
How was it removed? And then I wonder what specifications my macro lens should have

By the way, this little thing came out very cool, you can definitely determine if you know them.
How was it removed? And then I wonder what specifications my macro lens should have

I shoot all the macro details with the EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro USM-a good lens and very inexpensive!

By the way, No. 3 is similar to Anacampsis sp., and Epinotia, we will assume that nisella
No. 2,4 possibly Chionodes fumatellus

This post was edited by Double A-08/23/2007 17: 04

Vietnam, Hanoi 10.04.85

I looked at it on Smart - Erionota thrax

It's a fathead, after all!
--------------------------------
And what is this belyanochka? MO. (I want morsei!!!)

It's a fathead, after all!
--------------------------------
And what is this belyanochka? MO. (I want morsei!!!)

Yes 100% Leptidea sinapis. morsei in MO no.

But like there is still reali?

But like there is still reali?

Mozh and real. Svidu they are the same. In a good way, you need to get your genitals smare.

Yes 100% Leptidea sinapis. There is no morsei in MO.

And here it is not!
Leptidea morsei is known from MO from a discovery in the mid-twentieth century. Recently, it was found in the north of the Tula region. So a possible view.

By the way, I have a belyanochka with elongated front wings from the Sergiev Posad district - but I haven't cooked it yet.

I don't really know what the reali and Morsay thing is.. All photos of reali look like Morse, and reali is not listed at all in Tuzov.. Isn't that the same thing?"?

I don't really know what the reali and Morsay thing is.. All photos of reali look like Morse, and reali is not listed at all in Tuzov.. Isn't that the same thing?"?

Reali is considered a twin of synapis -- but it differs well in its genitals. These two species are distributed sympatrically and both are common in Central Russia. Moreover, in the Tula region, a large study was conducted-they cooked up a hell of a lot of specimens, both old and new-and found out that realis is common everywhere-and synapis has become less common over the past 100 years. What is the situation with them in the Ministry of Defense-is unknown.

And here, more recently, morseea was discovered-which in the Central Russian region, unlike, say, Siberian populations, does not differ clearly in appearance from the other two species.

Now belyanochek - only for dismemberment

Here are taler's butterflies

Going back to old records
I looked at the newly released "The Lepidoptera of Israel, vol. 1: Erebidae" most similar to Catocala eutychea.

Maybe someone will need it

I made a base here on pyadenitsam based on the following сайтов:
leps.it (MBE)
UK Moths
Arnold Spuhler's Atlas of Butterflies
svenska fjarilar
List of Lepidoptera of the Moscow and Kaluga regions
List of Lepidoptera by Vlad Proklov.

It turned out a little more than 1000 types. Database structure:

FAMILY-subfamily
GENUS-genus
SPECIES-species
AUTHOR-author who described the species
FREQ-summer frequency from the "List of Lepidoptera of the Moscow and Kaluga regions" in the range from "1" - abundant to "5" - extremely rare
WINGS - wingspan
MTIME - summer time in Russia
ETIME - summer time in Europe (where there is, denm-acc. day / evening/night/morning)
UK-code for UK Moths
MBE-availability on the website leps.it (MBE)
SF-availability on the svenska fjarilar
SPULER website-table/image number in the Spuler Atlas PROKL
-code in the list from the disk attached to the book " The Lepidoptera of Europe "(Karsholt & Razowski, 1996). (kindly posted by Vlad Proklov)
COMM_NAME - English name
RUS_NAME-Russian name
REDBOOK-presence in the Red Book (so far only the CC of Moscow-acc. M)
COMMENT - mostly synonymy (not everywhere, only clearly identified )

Format: .DBF(280K) and .XLS(210K)
Comments are welcome.
Link to the page: http://ammonites.narod.ru/butt.htm

And in general, it is very interesting, will it be useful to anyone? Maybe, at your leisure, during the long tedious winter, you can continue this business, say, by shovels?

This post was edited by aleko - 24.08.2007 12: 30

Maybe someone will need it

I made a database here on pyadenitsam based on the following sites:
[...]
List of Lepidoptera by Vlad Proklov.

I'm flattered, of course
But this is not my list - this is a European list from the disc attached to the book " The Lepidoptera of Europe "(Karsholt & Razowski, 1996).
We don't need other people's merits

Maybe someone will need it

And in general, it is very interesting, will it be useful to anyone? Maybe, at your leisure, during the long tedious winter, you can continue this business, say, by shovels?

Thanks!

Come in handy. Go ahead

I'm flattered, of course
But this is not my list - this is a European list from the disc attached to the book " The Lepidoptera of Europe "(Karsholt & Razowski, 1996).
We don't need other people's merits

For what I bought on the website "Butterflies of the Crimea", for what I tried to sell
I corrected the message and at the same time decoded the values of the fields in the database.