Identification of Lepidoptera (Butterflies and Moths)

Take a look to be sure, if you don't mind.

In addition to the specified site by Andrey Vladimirovich here is another good site http://ftp.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insec...ulinea/#teleius
You seem to have found the subspecies correctly, Phengaris teleius euphemia, only you have a male and not a female.

Good day to all! Help with the definition, please.
The butterfly was caught in Thailand (Phuket) in early February 2018.
There are several hypotheses, and yet it does not exactly correspond to any of them: Euthalia (ipona / telchinia), Cynitia flora andersonii

Pictures:

5D91F789_9B16_4070_A57C_2A0BC6460DAC.jpeg — (296.99к)

Presumably Acleris comariana (Lienig & Zeller, 1846)
http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Acleris_Comariana
http://uahost.uantwerpen.be/vve/checklists.../Acomariana.htm

with such tentacles!! search among Pandemis

Help me determine it.
Belarus. Minsk region.

For the correct answer, it is advisable to indicate the date of shooting, otherwise divination.

Presumably Acleris comariana (Lienig & Zeller, 1846)
http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Acleris_Comariana
http://uahost.uantwerpen.be/vve/checklists.../Acomariana.htm

Definitely not Acleris comariana, not even a genus.
I agree with Svyatoslav, it looks like Pandemis

Good day to all! Help with the definition, please.
The butterfly was caught in Thailand (Phuket) in early February 2018.
There are several hypotheses, and yet it does not exactly correspond to any of them: Euthalia (ipona / telchinia), Cynitia flora andersonii

Tanaecia julii is a good butterfly, well made, and a pin...

This post was edited by cleobis - 17.02.2018 19: 28

Pictures:

Tanaecia_julii_S_Thailand_1.jpg — (37.1к)


Tanaecia_julii_v.jpg — (39.9к)

Take a look to be sure, if you don't mind.

Phengaris (Maculinea) teleius euphemia (Staudinger, 1887) [Lycaena]. DV: Wed-Okhot.,
N-Amur., Wed-Amur., Approx. (Annotir_katalog_nasek_daln_vostoka_2016)

Tanaecia julii is a good butterfly, well made, and a pin...

Thank you very much!
Don't blame me, I'm just a novice collector, this is the third butterfly So I still don't know how to spread it expertly.

Thank you very much!
Don't blame me, I'm just a novice collector, this is the third butterfly So I still don't know how to spread it expertly.

Really well done, no gags ! And the instance is good.

Friends, good evening to all!
Can you tell me this from apollo meinhardi?
Kemerovo region, near Novokuznetsk, July 1994.

Pictures:

11________.jpg — (214.23к)

Friends, good evening to all!
Can you tell me this from apollo meinhardi?
Kemerovo region, near Novokuznetsk, July 1994.

Actually, yes:
http://omflies.ru/Species/apollo.htm
But Mr. S. Korb in his catalog - 2016 positions this subspecific taxon as a synonym of the Ural ssp. limicola for Zap. Siberia. Wait here for his comment and make a decision on the validity of taxa based on its results.

Actually, yes:
http://omflies.ru/Species/apollo.htm
But Mr. S. Korb in his catalog - 2016 positions this subspecific taxon as a synonym of the Ural ssp. limicola for Zap. Siberia. Wait here for his comment and make a decision on the validity of taxa based on its results.

Andrey Vladimirovich, thank you!

Hello! Can you tell me if this is Argynnis niobe or Argynnis adippe? There seem to be two dark lines running along the edge of the wing on the underside - or do I think?

Friends, good evening to all!

There are doubts about the subspecies, recorded as P. phoebus intermedius, but all the others caught with it were P. phoebus alpestris with small black dots instead of red eyes or a barely noticeable reddening in the center of the black.

Altai, Katun Ridge, Karatyurek Pass, 2100 meters, 4 km., from Akkem Lake, 15.07.1993.

Pictures:

3.jpg — (111.13 k)

Two subspecies don't fly in the same place.

Yes, this is Phoebus in the usual sense for us. But in accordance with the decision of the ICZN Commission, we are now forced to call this butterfly Parnassius corybas Fischer de Waldheim, 1824 (phoebus auct., nec Fabricius, 1793). With subspecies in Altai - different options. Which one is considered correct today? Who has the latest volume of J. C. Weiss, M. B. will tell you.

This post was edited by fraudatrix - 02/20/2018 02: 10

Two subspecies don't fly in the same place.

Dear Djon, That's right, they don't fly, but I guess it's just a mistake in the view label.

Yes, this is Phoebus in the usual sense for us. But in accordance with the decision of the ICZN, we are now forced to call this butterfly Parnassius corybas Fischer de Waldheim, 1824 (phoebus auct., nec Fabricius, 1793). With subspecies in Altai - different options. Which one is considered correct today? Who has the latest volume of J. C. Weiss, M. B. will tell you.

Hello Andrey Vladimirovich! And that's for sure, I'm just sorting out parnassus here, I'll have to redo the labels to the pile. Red spots he has for alpestris some large.

Draughtsman from ocd. Krasnoyarsk, taiga. 23.06.12
I think this is M. athalia. Please confirm or deny it.

Please help me identify the scoop.
Belarus. Minsk region
03. 08.2017

Pictures:

IMG_7131.JPG — (310.76к)


IMG_7132.JPG — (335.22к)

Moth from South Korea. September
https://pp.userapi.com/c824410/v824410956/c...RCC24NGVDUI.jpg

Moth from South Korea. September

http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Larentii...complicata.html

Help me identify the scoop.
11.09.2017
MO, Railway
Mniotype satura?
[attachmentid()=298823]

Help me identify the scoop.
11.09.2017
MO, Railway
Mniotype satura?

My God, where did the defining elements go? It's just some kind of gray area. Well, it happens

My God, where did the defining elements go?

Mustache zmerzli aki Mowgli

Two subspecies don't fly in the same place.

in the case of parnassus, this is not the case))

in the case of parnassus, this is not the case))

What, can three or more people fly?

What, can three or more people fly?

Yes, Europeans in labels sometimes write such subspecies that without half a liter you will not understand Here eversmanni I have all the Altai lake Akkem and the village of Aktash nominatives, and the Buryat village of Mondy, stands with the label vosnessenski. In Buryatia, after all, it seems not vosnessenski, but the same nominative?

Help me determine it.
Donetsk region, Torez, early June

Yes, Europeans in labels sometimes write such subspecies that without half a liter you will not understand Here eversmanni I have all the Altai lake Akkem and the village of Aktash nominatives, and the Buryat village of Mondy, stands with the label vosnessenski. In Buryatia, after all, it seems not vosnessenski, but the same nominative?

In Mondes, the nominative; ssp. vosnessenskii - north-east up to Kamchatka. And as for with spots - without spots, so there are still forms, subspecies have nothing to do with it. In short, Parnassus is a delicate matter. Those who know them really well (unlike me) will not write anything here.

Help me determine it.
Donetsk region, Torez, early June

Melitaea trivia.

Again photos are not loaded!!??

Hello, Dear forum participants. I want to immediately apologize to the moderators for possibly incorrectly posting a post for which I did not want to create a separate topic. On the forum, I am an inexperienced person and if I am stupid, I apologize in advance. The essence of the question. I work in the Smolenskoye Poozerye National Park, and by chance, I am involved in environmental education. One of the main activities of my organization is the creation and publication of educational literature. In recent years, there has been a serious downward trend in the quality of such materials. In addition to the banal mistakes of unqualified comrades, plagiarism takes place. The first booklet about the Park's insects will be about butterflies. I, on the other hand, have nothing to do with staphylinid beetles, except for my past as a collector. I appeal to all specialists and butterfly lovers to provide photos of live butterflies from central Russia on the following conditions:: 1. We agree that each photo will be taken by the author (the picture will be signed). 2. It is possible and desirable to include photo authors in the team of authors. If possible, samples of finished products will be sent to the authors. Their comments and suggestions will be taken into account. 3. Photos should be of high quality and attractive. 4. It is pointless to include small and difficult to identify lepidoptera in the booklet for our purposes.
I basically do not want to go down the path of least resistance, pulling photos from the relevant sections. All interested please write in PM. My address: osemionenkov@yandex.ru. I hope for your support, dear forumchane. Maybe I'll come in handy myself sometime.
Sincerely, Oleg Semionenkov

People - why aren't photos attached? "am I being stupid?"

This is a forum issue. Many people don't have it attached.Currently, communication is limited to texts only.

On the door, Odessa, 01.03.2018
Help to identify

Hyphantria cunea

Hello! Cucullia mixta or am I wrong? Rep. Khakassia, river bankYenisei, water meadow. Into the light. Thank you in advance!

Sorry, I didn't attach it..

Good afternoon, please help me determine the type.
Holland, greenhouses for growing spices.
The wings seem to be golden, shiny, iridescent, something like horns on top, the head is red, the eyes seem to be from below. small, 1.5 centimeters.
Caterpillars of the same species are light green, thick, eat marjoram.






This post was edited by misswolffy-05.03.2018 16: 28

Thysanoplusia orichalcea
http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Thysanoplusia_Orichalcea

This post was edited by Djon-05.03.2018 16: 42