E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Identification of Hemiptera

Community and ForumInsects identificationIdentification of Hemiptera

Pages: 1 ...10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18... 101

03.11.2009 9:19, gumenuk

3. Bedbug. ?
Moscow region, Ramenskiy district, Khripan.
Recording time in the file name.

Pictures:
picture: 25.08.2009__DSC03740.jpg
25.08.2009__DSC03740.jpg — (242.32к)

03.11.2009 14:52, vasiliy-feoktistov

1. Bedbug ?
Moscow region, Ramenskiy district, Khripan.
Recording time in the file name.

Picromerus bidens Linnaeus, 1758?
Likes: 1

03.11.2009 14:54, vasiliy-feoktistov

3. Bedbug. ?
Moscow region, Ramenskiy district, Khripan.
Recording time in the file name.

Coreidae sp.
Likes: 1

03.11.2009 15:07, gumenuk

Maybe a young Coreus marginatus ?

03.11.2009 16:43, gumenuk

4. Bedbug. ?
Moscow region, Ramenskiy district, Khripan.
Recording time in the file name.

Pictures:
picture: 27.08.2009___DSC03494.jpg
27.08.2009___DSC03494.jpg — (184.21к)

03.11.2009 17:19, barry

Maybe a young Coreus marginatus ?

Coreus marginatus terminal
Likes: 2

05.11.2009 9:47, gumenuk

Is this Troilus luridus ?
MO. Ramenskiy district, Khripan, Sept.

Pictures:
picture: 15.09.2009___DSC05216.jpg
15.09.2009___DSC05216.jpg — (254.17к)

05.11.2009 14:06, Александрс

Tell me what the name of the exotic is. Possibly Nepal. Thanks!

This post was edited by Alexandrs - 05.11.2009 14: 07

Pictures:
picture: DSC_9306.jpg
DSC_9306.jpg — (36.59к)

05.11.2009 14:12, Dmitrii Musolin

4. Bedbug. ?
Moscow region, Ramenskiy district, Khripan.
Recording time in the file name.


this one is Picromerus bidens, and 1. Bug ? -- no.
Likes: 1

05.11.2009 17:44, Amplion

Is this Troilus luridus ?
MO. Ramenskiy district, Khripan, Sept.

Well, yes, it is the same smile.gif
Likes: 1

06.11.2009 9:44, gumenuk

Can someone tell me what kind of bedbugs?
Ramenskiy district, Moscow region

Pictures:
picture: 08.08.2009___DSC00864.jpg
08.08.2009___DSC00864.jpg — (234.6к)

picture: 13.09.2009___DSC05029.jpg
13.09.2009___DSC05029.jpg — (166.03к)

06.11.2009 23:40, NakaRB

3 more bedbugs... Moscow oblast

1. 11.07.2009
user posted image

2. 11.07.2009
user posted image

3. 11.07.2009
user posted image

08.11.2009 10:45, Amplion

gumenuk, in the first photo - the larva of a shield beetle, possibly from the genus Carpocoris. For example, here is the larva of Carpocoris pudicus:
http://www.galerie-insecte.org/galerie/vie...Fcarpolarve.jpg
I can't really say anything about the second photo. To be honest, it scares me and destroys all my childhood ideas about harmless horseflies ...
NakaRB is simpler here - but only up to the genus (((
1. Phitocoris. In my opinion, a person who caught only one phytocoris))) is similar to Phytocoris pini.
2. It's more complicated here. It may be Lygocoris, or it may be Orthotylus, or other green plants. It is better to wait for a specialist
3. Capsus, Capsus ater most likely.
Likes: 2

08.11.2009 11:06, barry

  
I can't really say anything about the second photo. To be honest, it scares me and destroys all my childhood ideas about harmless horseflies ...

Apparently, on occasion, they do not disdain to profit from the remains of someone else's feast. In general, too, sometimes met, and also this fact makes you think...
Likes: 2

08.11.2009 11:40, Dmitrii Musolin

among the myrids, there are quite a few zoo-phytophages. in general, many bedbugs do not like to try animal food. the same soldier bug.
Likes: 2

11.12.2009 22:39, NakaRB

3 more bedbugs arrived in time smile.gif
Moscow and the region.

1. 26.07.2009
from such a situation, except for Stenodema, you can't say more?
user posted image

2. 26.07.2009
user posted image

3. 26.07.2009
Capsus of some kind?
user posted image

11.12.2009 22:51, barry

3 more bedbugs arrived in time smile.gif
Moscow and the region.

1. 26.07.2009

2-I THINK Adelphocoris seticornis
Likes: 1

14.12.2009 8:36, Amplion

1. Well, why, you can still say that it's definitely not calcaratum / trispinosa. In general, I am almost sure that this is Stedodema laevigata, look at its back thighs - they seem to be intercepted at the distal end, and the lower legs (back, again) are slightly curved. But, in general, perhaps, "I see it that way".
2. Stands in solidarity with barry smile.gif
3. Capsus ater. The probability is 75 % (very confused by the peculiar plaque on the elytra). And so - well, as if it looks like:
http://www.miridae.dk/capsus_ater.htm
Likes: 1

15.12.2009 22:56, NakaRB

 
1. Well, why, you can still say that it's definitely not calcaratum / trispinosa. In general, I am almost sure that this is Stedodema laevigata, look at its back thighs - they seem to be intercepted at the distal end, and the lower legs (back, again) are slightly curved. But, in general, perhaps, "I see it that way".

well, there is already a lot smile.gifof it, it seems, and its view from above... in the next message I will show

15.12.2009 23:07, NakaRB

more bedbugs. Moscow and the region

1. 26.07.2009
maybe it was his side view that was higher... I do not remember frown.gif
user posted image

2. 26.07.2009
Adelphocoris quadripunctatus?
user posted image

3. 26.07.2009
user posted image

4. 26.07.2009
user posted image

5. 26.07.2009
Adelphocoris quadripunctatus? the color of the shield, however, is confusing...
user posted image

6. 17.07.2009
Adelphocoris quadripunctatus?
user posted image

7. 17.07.2009
user posted image

16.12.2009 9:22, Amplion

1. Stedodema laevigata. Yes, I'm sure it's her now. Example of a similar one:
http://www.koleopterologie.de/heteroptera/...foto-manci.html
2,5,6-yes, that's it! True, I was more confused not by the shield, but by the antennae - yes, in this species they are two-color, but in the third photo there is almost a three-color contrast! This, in principle, is not important, just a good photo!
3. It's a pity, you can't see the macro mustache. With a probability of 85%, I can say that this is Phytocoris longipennis. But for insurance - just Phytocoris.
7. I'm ashamed to say I don't know. If I had the original photo , I would check it out. It is similar to several genera at the same time, especially Megaloceroea, but small signs are not visible.
4.I don't have any ideas either. I'll look and think frown.gif
Likes: 1

16.12.2009 22:12, NakaRB

here's to # 3 photo with the clearest sawyere smile.gif

user posted image

link to the original photo # 7:
http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/3901/nakarb...d05f159_-1-orig

and another Stenodema, it seems to be different...
user posted image

17.12.2009 5:12, Amplion

Still not sure about the third one. For clarity of definition, it is desirable to know, for example, the color of the first tendril - whether longitudinal stripes stretch along it or it is covered with hatching ... However, by indirect signs, it is almost certainly Phytocoris longipennis. Ph. tilliae, an alternative species, less similar.

According to photo # 7, it is now clearly visible that this is Megaloceraea reticornis (as I understand it, this species was previously called M. linearis). Sometimes good photo quality helps a lot! wink.gif

Stenodema-yes, it's a different view now. It seems to be Stenodema holsatum (or St. holsata, as it is now accepted). The signs are suitable, but there seems to be no alternative smile.gif
Likes: 1

17.12.2009 18:46, akulich-sibiria

hello. anything to say about Aradus
picture: P5310101_.jpg
picture: P5310103_.jpg
picture: P5310104_.jpg
sort of like a female. as a betulae option..

Pictures:
picture: P5310105_.jpg
P5310105_.jpg — (132.59к)

17.12.2009 22:06, Amplion

akulich-sibiria, hello! It doesn't look like A. betulae. It seems to be a female, and the birch podkornik has a female's backside stretched out:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/41032465@N04/3891644093/
I went through the identifier - most likely, this is A. betulinus (yes, this is a different species). However, only if it was caught in Siberia (the further south, the more likely). The length varies from 6.7 to 9 mm. Does it fit?

17.12.2009 23:35, NakaRB

Still not sure about the third one. For clarity of definition, it is desirable to know, for example, the color of the first tendril - whether longitudinal stripes stretch along it or it is covered with hatching...

yeah... such signs are not associated with my techniquesmile.gif, or at least not in the field...

18.12.2009 6:31, akulich-sibiria

akulich-sibiria, hello! It doesn't look like A. betulae. It seems to be a female, and the birch podkornik has a female's backside stretched out:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/41032465@N04/3891644093/
I went through the identifier - most likely, this is A. betulinus (yes, this is a different species). However, only if it was caught in Siberia (the further south, the more likely). The length varies from 6.7 to 9 mm. Does it fit?


In general, A. betulinus is suitable. According to Vinokurov, I also considered this species. but I am confused by the ratio of width and length of the shield. It seems to me that his ratio is less than 1.5, and certainly not 2. Although this can only be judged when both options are in hand. I have caught a male A. betulinus, although there are also disputes about it. I'll send you his photo later. In general, the group turned out to be quite heavy. I have about 10 pieces and it looks like the types are also different.
Does the 3rd part of the mustache have to be white? For this instance, it is dark. It was caught in Khakassia, in larch forests, although other coniferous species are likely.

18.12.2009 8:49, Amplion

In general, A. betulinus is suitable. According to Vinokurov, I also considered this species. but I am confused by the ratio of width and length of the shield. It seems to me that his ratio is less than 1.5, and certainly not 2. Although this can only be judged when both options are in hand. I have caught a male A. betulinus, although there are also disputes about it. I'll send you his photo later. In general, the group turned out to be quite heavy. I have about 10 pieces and it looks like the types are also different.
Does the 3rd part of the mustache have to be white? For this instance, it is dark. It was caught in Khakassia, in larch forests, although other coniferous species are likely.

In general, I also defined it by Vinokurov. Your instance in the photo, imho, has just such a ratio of the shield (1.6-2 to the width). In addition, the description of the pronotum and the general course of determination are suitable. It is a pity that the fourth segment of the antennae has not been preserved smile.gif.
But I didn't see anything about the color of the third segment of the antennae in Vinokurov wink.gif. On the contrary, such a feature would have been clearly noticed in the description of the species, but it is not there.

18.12.2009 9:18, akulich-sibiria

In general, I also defined it by Vinokurov. Your instance in the photo, imho, has just such a ratio of the shield (1.6-2 to the width). In addition, the description of the pronotum and the general course of determination are suitable. It is a pity that the fourth segment of the antennae has not been preserved smile.gif.
But I didn't see anything about the color of the third segment of the antennae in Vinokurov wink.gif. On the contrary, such a feature would have been clearly noticed in the description of the species, but it is not there.

maybe you're right. I have a good friend who deals with bedbugs and is just preparing a half-bottle for Vinokurov. I think it will be necessary to throw him your fees smile.gif

18.12.2009 12:06, Amplion

Be sure to throw it up-few people will know better than him! Unfortunately, I don't have a connection with it myself, but it's a pity frown.gif- there are also problematic views in the collection ...

19.12.2009 20:54, akulich-sibiria

Be sure to throw it up-few people will know better than him! Unfortunately, I have no connection with it myself, but it's a pity frown.gif- there are also problematic views in the collection ...


I think he can help you, too. You will find his email address and try to ask him. wink.gif

20.12.2009 16:02, Mantispid

Can you tell me what kind of bug it is? (photo not mine)

20.12.2009 16:14, Dmitrii Musolin

Can you tell me what kind of bug it is? (the photo is not mine)



Tessaratomidae
Likes: 1

09.01.2010 10:50, jabenok

Please help me deal with Volgograd bedbugs.
Nothing out of the ordinary, but still
.01 Rhynocoris annulatus?
picture: 01_P1040338_мол.jpg
02 Rhynocoris iracundus?
picture: 02_Р1090216_мол.јрд
03 Eurydema ventralis?
picture: 03_Р1090573_мол.јрд
04
picture: 04_Р1150186_мол.јрд
05
picture: 05_Р1210179_мол.јрд
06 Dicranocephalus medius?
picture: 06_Р1100360_мол.јрд
07 Odontotarsus purpurolineatus?
picture: 07_P1120114_мол.jpg
08
picture: 08_Р1100975_мол.јрд
09 Podisus?
picture: 09_Р1140833_мол.јрд
10
picture: 10_P1160318_мол.jpg
11 Aradus betulae?
picture: 11_P1210148_мол.jpg
12
picture: 12_P1130476_мол.jpg
13
picture: 13_P1130771_мол.jpg

09.01.2010 11:15, barry

1, 2-yes
3, 4-I think Eurydema ornata is still
6-Dicranocephalus albipes rather
8-Carpocoris ?fuscispinus
9 - Arma custos
10 - Palomena prasina. Fall or spring?
5 - Eurydema oleracea
Likes: 1

09.01.2010 11:23, jabenok

barry thank you!
10-October 2008

09.01.2010 20:47, jabenok

Dear experts, on the forum on beetles there was an assumption that this is a bug:
picture: 16_P1120243_мол.jpg
Size approx. 5mm. Sat on dry grass such as wheatgrass in the dry steppe biocenoze

10.01.2010 17:00, Amplion

That's right, turtle. genus Irochrotus, probably Ir. lunatus or Ir. caspius (I don't know more precisely, because I didn't catch any. The latter lives on the Lower Volga and seems to be more suitable. The first one is larger - up to 8 mm).
Likes: 1

12.01.2010 23:33, VBoris

Please identify the bug.

Pictures:
picture: klop48.jpg
klop48.jpg — (155.89 k)

13.01.2010 21:10, Amplion

This is an extra-thick female Leptopterna, most likely dolabrata.
Likes: 1

Pages: 1 ...10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18... 101

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.