Identification of Hemiptera

Community and Forum → Insects identification → Identification of Hemiptera

Pages: 1 ...6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14... 101

Likes: 1

Likes: 3

Likes: 1

15.03.2009 2:10, Tentator

Tentator, thank you so much for your deep scientific approach! Can you call it something in Russian? Not just that it's one of the Raptors, but a little more specific?

No problem. A deep approach is not obtained with all the desire. But if you didn't just take a picture, but also brought a copy, then it's a different matter. But the material, as I understand it, is not? What do you mean by "more specific"? I also wrote: subfamily Ectrichodiinae. If you want to find out the name of this species in Russian, then there is no such name. It would be strange if such things existed for bedbugs from Ceylon. And in general, Reduviidae is the second largest family of Heteroptera; it is not enough imagination to come up with vernacular names for all 7,000 species. When I. M. Kerzhner was asked how to name a species that does not have a Russian name in Russian, he always advised transliterating the Latin name. So, you can call this species "antiopula pumila". But I must remind you that this definition is approximate.

21.03.2009 14:59, Слон2009

No problem. A deep approach is not obtained with all the desire. But if you didn't just take a picture, but also brought a copy, then it's a different matter. But the material, as I understand it, is not? What do you mean by "more specific"? I also wrote: subfamily Ectrichodiinae. If you want to find out the name of this species in Russian, then there is no such name. It would be strange if such things existed for bedbugs from Ceylon. And in general, Reduviidae is the second largest family of Heteroptera; it is not enough imagination to come up with vernacular names for all 7,000 species. When I. M. Kerzhner was asked how to name a species that does not have a Russian name in Russian, he always advised transliterating the Latin name. So, you can call this species "antiopula pumila". But I must remind you that this definition is approximate.

It's scary to take it in your hands, and you say take it! I love insects, but excluded contemplatively....

Likes: 1

28.03.2009 21:31, Tentator

11 larvae of the carnivorous scutellum (M. b. Troilus luridus)
33 Elasmucha grisea
15.36 slepnyak (I'm not good at them)
20 horsefly
23 Gastrodes grossipes
24 Elasmucha ferrugata
26 horsefly
27 Acantosoma haemorhoidale
29 lich. slepnyaka
30 Stenotus binotatus
31 Nithecus jacobaeae, I think
38 Phylus melanocephalus?
39 Horsefly
40 Stenodema?
41 Rhyparochromus pini

11 -- Troilus luridus is;
33 -- Elasmucha grisea or E. fieberi, according to this photo it is more accurate to say nelya;
15 -- Adelphocoris quadripunctatus;
20,36 -- Deraeocoris ruber;
26 -- Grypocoris sexguttatus;
27 -- Acantosoma haemorhoidale or Elasmostethus interstinctus;
38 -- Phylus melanocephalus - it looks like;
39 -- Adelphocoris lineolatus.

Otherwise, I agree.

Likes: 1

06.05.2009 12:15, Tentator

Apparently, Lygaeus equestris.

This seemingly very catchy and individual look is associated with one of the very common errors in the definition, even among some specialists, which I have been going to write about for a long time. This error occurs due to the absence of a species close to Lygaeus equestris and sympatric to it in the Russian-language determinants (Lygaeus simulans Deckert, 1985). L. simulans differs from L. equestris only slightly - only a much shorter flat area at the base of the scutellum and-for those who are not lazy to make preparations for the genitals-a straight, not curved pituitary gland in the distal part of the paramer and a narrow sensory process. The morphological differences of these species are shown in the attached figure, while another figure shows the distribution of these species from the Catalog of the Heteroptera of the Palearctic Region, vol. 4, Pentatomomorpha I. 2001.

This post was edited by Tentator - 06.05.2009 13: 02

Pictures:
picture: Untitled_2.jpg