Photos of collections

Here it is)

Pictures:

20220304_234003.jpg — (328.22к)

I was told that this is a rare form.

A little bit of straightening)

Pictures:

Polish_20220309_215455430.jpg — (1.61 mb)

The second box with geotrups inermis Menetries 1832 is nothing but our Trypocopris inermis Menetries 1832, and not Jekelius

Dude.. My group is not considerably into looking at, but somehow I acquired to read several articles on your blog. Its fantastic how interesting it’s for me to visit you fairly often. 메이저놀이터

So that the topic does not die at all, I decided to put up one box. A very diverse bear, the division into subspecies clearly requires refinement. The Dubatolov classification is probably the most adequate, but there are also questions about it. There is very little Japanese material, and the plantaginis are very diverse and the largest

Pictures:

B73AB3EB_0079_4F21_BEBD_4C358D4361BD.jpeg — (3.7 mb)

Oh, I really like these subspecies of insects, especially butterflies and beetles, sometimes allocated 10 pieces in the offspring of one female

Oh, I really like these subspecies of insects, especially butterflies and beetles, sometimes allocated 10 pieces in the offspring of one female

I read the determinant of braconids - there is the opposite situation - 10 species, which, the author assumes, after the revision may be reduced to one changeable))

Well, then the non-commercial group is a super-rare subspecies of a banal type that can't be sold to anyone

With almost all insects, the situation is standard: some taxonomists regularly describe species, others reduce them, and these processes balance each other out. That is, the state of the taxon system is determined by the levels of scientific knowledge and skills (and, alas, ignorance of skills, but let's not talk about the sad). Subspecies are generally very rarely distinguished, usually only in cases of obvious geographical and morphological differentiation. In spiders, the selection of subspecies is generally the exception rather than the rule. But with beetles and butterflies (and only with those that are "macro"), the situation is radically different: it is normal there when there are more subspecies than populations, despite the fact that the same descriptions know that, for example, the color of butterfly wings is so determined by modification variability that from the offspring of one urticaria, by warming the pupae to different temperatures, you can get almost as diverse a box as in the sdi photo, but they are silent. And there is no sadder story in the world than when an outsider, who has never seen the object of his study alive in his life, and therefore has no idea about the presence of any forms of reproductive isolation inside it in nature, picks up dry material and begins to conjure over it.

The message was edited INO-03.11.2022 01: 06