Community and Forum → Entomological collections → Net bags
Peter Khramov, 16.09.2014 14:01
They started making their own bags. In general, who took it, everything was fine with everyone, but there were also a couple of comments. I want to clarify how specific they are for specific people, i.e. whether it is worth making some changes for complete happiness.
Keep in mind that:
A) Bags for ordinary nets (not water, not for mowing).
B) The design is two-petaled (without a pronounced bottom).
We are interested in your opinion on two parameters::
1. The length of the bag. Now it's done like this (diameter — length):
30 — 70
35 — 80
40 — 90
50 — 115
65 — 150
That is, two turns plus a margin (do not forget that one of the sides of the bag turns less, so the margin is formed not flat, but quite bag-shaped and, in general, somewhat larger than the length of the Bag minus Two Diameters.
For regular Entosphinx models/The length of the paradox is smaller. The exception is 40 cm, for which it is the same.
Question:Do you think that the above parameters are normal for the average user?
2. Bottom shape. Now it's done like this:
That is, the bottom shape is slightly rounded. As far as I remember, it looks about the same in Paradox.
But in Entosphinxes (especially in small sizes) she's like this:
That is, it is flat.
I think that the slight rounding of such a (flat) bag is only a plus, but I may not be able to catch up with something. That's why the second question is:
Leave it as it is or make a flat version, like Entosphinx?
Please vote in the survey above and unsubscribe comments in the subject line.
P. S. Again. The survey is specifically for a two-petaled (flat) bag design.
This post was edited by Asar - 16.09.2014 14: 02
Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.
* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.