Abstracts on entomology

Again, the real" citation index " of the work and the journal's popularity cannot be physically known by non-specialists sitting on academic councils. And the current bureaucratic "indexes" are from the evil one. After all, bureaucrats do not know and do not want to know the literature that is published in the region, country, or world, and operate only in a very narrow circle of "well-known" publications. A person can publish a good work in a provincial or little-known collection, or even in the form of a monograph, but it will not be known to those who display this "index". Only in the environment of industry specialists can there be an idea of the real demand and quality of work.

I agree that there are no ideal methods, but indexing allows you to introduce an additional element of objectivity. In the end, you can combine two processes - taking into account citation etc. and the opinion of specialists in the group. And there are groups where" one and a half " specialists work, not like the bulavous ones...

As for the "key academicians", if they were once specialists, they are often" preserved "in their knowledge during their stay at Olympus. Their activities - administrative, political, whatever, but not necessarily in the same field in which he worked in his youth. Therefore, the opinion of the academician, if it is necessary to take into account, is based on the principle of 1 person - 1 vote, in no other way. And also to see if the academician is a specialist in the group, or only a "great compiler" and inventor of terms.

I am afraid that democracy will not work here, science is basically undemocratic. The weight of the voice of different specialists varies. You can ask them yourself .

Well, the topic has been littered more than once
All journals (not only those included in the HAC list) have a queue from the back entrance, but the level is still quite different. The citation system is imperfect in many ways, but this is only if you have played many years before not by the same rules as the whole world. Some people still don't want to come to terms with it, and others can't. You need to live with the realities of today. You need to report an impact article to such a journal, in any case, in impact journals the score is much higher than in the notorious "Vestniki".
One thing is clear, no matter where you write, you need to keep a certain level, not for the report, impact and fee, but for your own sense of satisfaction and approval of colleagues.

Grisha and all the guys from Donetsk, as well as from Kharkiv, Kiev, Simferopol and Sumy -

This post was edited by Coelioxys - 12/26/2012 16: 03

About the level: it depends on what kind of VAKOV journal, i.e. what kind of editorial board and circle of reviewers there is. For example, on diurnal butterflies, more than one VAKOV journal is not able to provide normal peer review and qualified acceptance of articles. Therefore, they sometimes publish something that is not accepted in every "Tymutarakan bulletin".

Any journal has subject editors who can send the manuscript for review to ANY specialist, including diurnal butterflies.
I don't understand how this group differs from the others.
Another thing is magazines that are not interested in high-quality works, but in something else (blat, money, offsets, etc.). There is no limit to "creativity".

I recently asked a member of the editorial board of the Moscow VAKOV journal how he could have missed one poorly written faunal article with poorly covered material and not very adequate taxonomy. He replied that 1) he himself understands daytime butterflies and did not consider it necessary to send them for review (although he was last interested in this group about 15 years ago); 2) the author is a "good person" type. That's all the criteria.
Another time I asked one almost full-time reviewer of another Moscow VAKOV magazine, and how did such and such nonsense get there, that authors whom you do not know and have not even seen in your eyes, refer to your help in identifying the material, and did not publish new material, which has already been published at least 3 times in a slightly different form in their province. He replied that sometimes articles are not shown to me, and it is not clear who they go through.
And if you take such a VAKOV magazine as Entomological Review, then everything is clear there. in St. Petersburg, there are simply no sufficiently broad specialists in diurnal butterflies. This is clear from the way they are presented in the "Catalog of Lepidoptera of Russia" and another major work published shortly before. They feel like Olympian gods there, and they can't "humiliate themselves" to appeal to external reviewers.

Entire dissertations. True, "not ours". They lie to themselves, no one hides them and does not charge money for their "delivery".

http://www.dart-europe.eu/About/info.php

here is an article from the Vakov magazine. lovely

File/s:



 ___________1.pdf

size: 136.31 k
number of downloads: 465

here is an article from the Vakov magazine. lovely

Braconidae, Apiaceae...
Yes, everything is wonderful there!

here is an article from the Vakov magazine. lovely

Super! and I did not know that Colias chrysotheme was described by Gorubnov )) And what, BSU bulletin in the lists of the Higher Attestation Commission?

I look at the list of may 2012, it's not there.

It is listed on elibrary as Vak.

but from the magazine's website. One Besvakov magazine.
Since 2007, 15 thematic issues have been published a year, which are distributed by subscription of Rospechat (index 18534), the magazine has received the international issue of the periodical ISSN 1994-0866, the format has become A4, the cover is color. The following areas became VAKOV's most popular: philosophy, political science, sociology and cultural studies; pedagogy and psychology; philology and art history-for the candidate of sciences; philosophy, sociology and cultural studies – for the doctor of sciences.

Since March 2010, the journal has been included by the Higher Attestation Commission in the List of scientific publications in which scientific results of dissertations for the degree of doctor and candidate of Sciences should be published.

This post was edited by Yakovlev - 12.01.2013 10: 49

Yes, I'm sorry. it's there. (strange - on the same date, the HAC website had a different list...)

Well, if someone has time, you need to write a review of the article and send it to the railway Station and the Higher Attestation Commission. Groaning here on the forum is useless..

Yes, I'm sorry. it's there. (strange - on the same date, the HAC website had a different list...)

Well, if someone has time, you need to write a review of the article and send it to the railway Station and the Higher Attestation Commission. Groaning here on the forum is useless..

I'll write. The devil pulled me and read the second article of this author. The one in pseudo-English. I'm in shock.

Well, why. But now you can not go to the Natural History Museum of Mongolia to see lepidopterons...

This post was edited by scarabee - 12.01.2013 17: 08

here is an article from the Vakov magazine. lovely

Yes, the article is at the 8th grade level. So much for the Vakov magazine. Probably the author will soon defend himself at this glorious university and become the head of Usu.

From the newspaper "Troitsky variant"
From the abstract of the doctoral dissertation of Isaak Kalina "Axiological foundations of modernization
of teacher education". Isaak Kalina-Minister of the Moscow Government, Head of the Moscow Department of Education.
The dissertation was defended at the Moscow University of Psychology and Social Sciences in September 2012.

Quotes:
"In the concepts and theories of modernization of society, economy, and education
, modernization is understood as a transition to modernity, which implies the modernization of what is chosen as modern";

"Moral experience of pedagogical activity as a component of the integral experience of pedagogical activity, being isomorphic to the moral culture of a professional group of teachers in its whole
(culture) structural completeness, but not volume, is the moral interaction between the teacher and pedagogical reality, the result of which is the personal,
value mode of the teacher, which connects him with pedagogical reality and is the subject of his further internal reflexive work, the criteria
of which are worldview universals, cultural values and morals";

"The essence of the value response principle is that it orients the teacher of a pedagogical university to develop the ability of a future teacher to give
a value response according to the criterion of such a value that bases the value of the situation, is based on another value that is in a complementarity relationship with it."

From the newspaper "Troitsky variant"
From the abstract of the doctoral dissertation of Isaak Kalina "Axiological foundations of modernization
of teacher education".

That's a lot of gibberish. A clear indicator of the complete decay of command and administrative remnants in the field of certification of administrative personnel.
Settling down at any cost.

this is a complete decay of pedagogy as a branch of knowledge... everything that is defended in this field of knowledge, except for correctional pedagogy, is a rare idiocy

here's another posting option... the name alone is expensive. I'm sad
for what you're so, VAK?????
http://amnko.ru/index.php/russian/about-us/

Cool magazine Where else can you find on the adjacent pages of the work with the titles "Variability of hawthorn populations in temporal and spatial aspects" and "Prospective epidemiological analysis of the morbidity of the population living near the impact areas of separating parts of launch vehicles". And I just glanced at the "Ecology" section, I can imagine what's in the other sections. On the other hand, you can laugh, but you can also learn something from some works... Theoretically, of course, who will look in the general dump?
The site is generally a masterpiece. The eye on the logo resembles a symbol of some secret society, but everything is freely available, which, alas, is rare for domestic magazines.

yes, articles in the public domain and there are good articles, but my deep conviction is that the magazine should be thematic... Otherwise, everything looks a little absurd. As well as the fact that publication in them (if it is a VAKOV magazine) should be free. I don't think that if there is a payment, they can refuse to publish to someone.

Yes, the article is at the 8th grade level.

[color=blue] [/color]
Rare gibberish. A clear indicator of the complete decay of command and administrative remnants in the field of certification of administrative personnel.

And I thought that "it" would settle down with its lack of literacy; n'dyk no - there zhe...
Please continue the course of treatment (see: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtop...E5%ED%E7%E8%E8)
"Break-ins" - in fact, but what can you do?
Lavr Bolshakov has neither a sense of proportion nor a sense of tact.
We will treat you (not with pills, but with enemas). Ai promise...

Illiterate Lavr Bolshakov, please explain what "threatened invertebrate species" means (in your Review Section (Eversmannia. No. 13-14. 2008. p. 100), and then ya already about the" bad " dumaiu...

Justus, why are you so far apart? The forum is full of participants who are not very burdened with knowledge of the Russian language, from under-educated schoolboys to quite mature husbands, but you found only specific people for your criticism. Your predilection for the" literacy " of the Laurel raises suspicions that he once crushed your favorite corn, and you, not immediately finding an adequate response, are now trying to recoup in a small way, moving on to personalities. I will immediately make a reservation that I am not a fan of the Laurel, and often the tone of its maxims causes my rejection. You must have read a lot of books and, perhaps, being a guardian of Russian literature, consider yourself a cultured person. But some of your posts on the forum, unfortunately, do not confirm this in any way. My advice to you, leave this forum for discussion of entomological topics, in particular, having quite specific headings, like "Abstracts on entomology", and then they are not visible here for a long time, so the subtitle appeared. Personal disputes can also be conducted in personal correspondence, I doubt that someone else's swearing is pleasant to an outsider here.

Justus, you are wrong to look for typos and missing commas.
The whole point is not in them, it's in the essence.
But in fact, L. V. is right in many of his reviews and posts. At least not for me.

Regarding high-profile cases in the Higher Attestation Commission, I recommend reading
a link. Maybe someday this swamp will clear up...

This post was edited by scarabee - 31.01.2013 16: 45

Thank you, kind scarabee.

if these assholes had lived in the old days, they would have had to shoot themselves. now the case will end, well, God forbid, with a noble attack of angina pectoris.

This post was edited by Yakovlev - 01.02.2013 04: 19

Nope! There will be no angina attack. These people don't have a heartache, do they, and do they have one? Shake yourself off, smile and move on with your life...

if these assholes had lived in the old days, they would have had to shoot themselves. now the case will end, well, God forbid, with a noble attack of angina pectoris.

Or maybe they're shooting goats?

Let's hope for the best -

http://www.gazeta.ru/social/news/2013/02/01/n_2734189.shtml

It is hardly worth hoping for significant consequences. As I am excluding part of this process

Sorry, wrong button.
It is hardly worth hoping for significant consequences. Since I observe part of this process "from the inside", the picture seems rather nasty to me. I fully agree with the commission's conclusions about the activities of a particular dissertation council. But please note that the commission of the Ministry was active in connection with the not very worthy activities of this very ministry to recognize MSPU as an inefficient university. And the commission's conclusions contain demands to punish persons who are not directly related to the activities of the dissent council – but who are not very pleasing to the ministry. Rather, we see a piece of the battle of officials, rather than an attempt to do something in the field of preparing and defending dissertations.
Unless MS Gelfand can do something ...

But this showdown is not in the field of life sciences, and therefore not in entomology, unfortunately. If we could just sort them out , it would be more interesting for us. But falsified entomological and ecological dissertations were conducted only by one prominent Vakov lady belonging to the Moscow State Pedagogical University , and they were molded in many places, including even Moscow State University. So the entomological dissertation octopus is much more ramified.

I understand what Lavr Valeryevich means. But I wrote just about the fact that the observed actions of the commission have little to do with the field of science and the octopuses that live there. It will be interesting to see the development of events. I think that the executive part devoted to the Moscow State Pedagogical University will be completed – but everything that concerns the activities of the Higher Attestation Commission, the development of new standards for the defense of dissertations, improving the appeals system, etc. - will sink into oblivion without any special consequences. I would like to make a mistake.

"Shamkhalov was detained, this is due to charges of misuse of Vnesheconombank's loan funds and legalization of illegally appropriated funds" - http://www.gazeta.ru/science/news/2013/02/05/n_2740561.shtml

And these people should control the quality of dissertations. Laugh or cry?

This post was edited by Zlopastnyi Brandashmyg - 05.02.2013 15: 31

The whole system of the Higher Attestation Commission and prostituted dis tied to it. Soviets are an octopus. Bran one tentacle - a new one will grow, a holy place is never empty. It is necessary to cut down the entire Vak region at the root.

http://vz.ru/society/2013/2/5/619001.html
pay attention to the indicators of this parameter for elibrary - 4 articles with the same title each. Guys, I'm shocked. The country is dead. Now a lot is clear with the surge of entomological science in many territories of our country. I wonder how the guy got a Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences with an H-Index of 3, and with such a volume of great articles. I think that the Higher Attestation Commission has lost all the points that still remained in the eyes of the population.

This post was edited by Yakovlev - 07.02.2013 04: 35

The country died in 1990. It's just that our entomology, as a business that is absolutely not profitable, is not so "popular" (from the word "priest") at delyag from the Ministry of Education and Science. By and large, all this office should be dispersed by the end of the year and return to the standards of the USSR in science. Then at nomenclature science (and this is how I see the awarding of degrees, real science doesn't smell there for a long time, and if it does, it doesn't smell very often) there will be a chance to start approaching the real one.

The country is not dead. And science is not dead in it. They were different. Here's VAK-yes, dying. As a remnant of the "science of standards of the USSR". Here I agree with L. V. Bolshakov – in the current conditions, the Higher Attestation Commission does not perform its functions and is not needed in this form. Because the Higher Attestation Commission is now more of an administrative body consisting of officials. Like all officials, they are interested in their maximum well-being with minimal effort. As is customary in our time of troubles, the self-sufficiency of officials results in lawlessness of various scales – in this respect, the Higher Attestation Commission is no better or worse than others. Experts of the Higher Attestation Commission relate to these officials in different ways: some are completely assimilated into the environment, others are not completely assimilated, and others are stubborn and do not assimilate. The latter, obviously, do not make the weather in the HAC.
Overclocking the HAC is half the solution. What's next?

I think that the executive part devoted to the Moscow State Pedagogical University will be completed – but everything that concerns the activities of the Higher Attestation Commission, the development of new standards for the defense of dissertations, improving the appeals system, etc. - will sink into oblivion without any special consequences. I would like to make a mistake.

Would you like to make a mistake? in vain. Better pray to God that this (also still very optimistic) forecast is correct. After all, the situation is much more standard for the current social conditions, when the public sacrifice of one and a half of their own (i.e. thieves) will only be a reason to start another campaign to finish off the remaining honest employees and eliminate first of all the structures that have not yet been bribed. A number of important structures have experienced this the hard way in recent decades; there is no reason to think that things will go differently when it comes to the Higher Attestation Commission.

And more optimistic options are possible only where there are really stopping penalties for theft. Structures and apparatus in any field are somehow unavoidable, because they are objectively necessary, and I support both the radical position of Lavr and Roman, and the question of what is next. Ultimately, it will depend not on how to organize and how to seat the quartet, but on whether the threat of punishment for usury is great. What fool (from not very honest people) will not take what can be taken objectively? As long as thieves actively finance the introduction into the legal consciousness of society of the priority of the inevitability of bullshit punishment, and not the severity of the punishment (especially for crimes where it technically cannot be inevitable), the law cannot fulfill its main preventive role, but performs only an exclusively punitive function, i.e. it becomes a social force for the individual. after his crime, and even then not everyone. A bribe is so difficult to fix (and often indirect, implicit) that fables about the inevitability of punishment will not stop someone who is ready to risk an extra year of freedom for a chest of currency. But if a potential corrupt official knows that the punishment is repugnant, fuck him, and that it is very unlikely that they will be caught, but if they are caught, then the tower and confiscation of property, except for the subsistence minimum of the family (and-what is absolutely necessary-the one who is ready to wrongfully award the tower to an innocent person knows the same thing).!!!),- then he will think hard about whether to sin even without witnesses and even on a desert island... Only such a path (of course, not without accompanying socio-economic transformations) can lead to the fact that the HSE will always be threatened, but it will almost not be used as unnecessary.
Let me remind you that during the first years of Soviet power, V. I. Lenin repeatedly pointed out as the most dangerous crimes for society as a whole, not those that are committed only by scumbags and that are more or less easy to criminalize and bring to justice, but those that can corrode and destroy the entire social order - communist swagger, bureaucracy and a bribe. That is, exactly what you will be tortured to document, catch and prove, and the decomposition of society as a result - to dust.