All comments on Insecta.pro, except for the technical ones
Community and Forum → All comments feed
All the latest comments on topics, photos and species on the site in reverse chronological order.
Show: All comments in a row. All comments, except for the technical ones.
Pages: 1 ...19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27... 218
Rod generally need to shovel. Changed everything there
Dmitry, there is "Quote" button above comment field)
Philaenus spumarius?
The protonum and elytrum are bigger than headtube, so it's conjugalis. But... Maybe dentipes too.
Melanoplini tribe or something like that — id by Vlad Proklov.
I've forgotten how it is done. Long time no see at the website. Help with technical part of the linking please.
Uncertain identification. Two much similar species and Mr Nikolaev thought there are but one. I linked it.
I've linked them. It's just so that they were in different groups already.
A good question for supervising this case. I'll get in touch with Stas and ask him how he is today.
It's one of the species: or/or )))
Lasius cf. alienus. Identification by Victor Kozhaev.
Camponotus vagus/saxatilis. Identification by Victor Kozhaev.
You can meet some fonts decorations bugs earlier (inappropriate bold, italic, etc.) It's fixed now.
It's fixed.
Alexander, it's OK. There are many more trouble with Coleoptera taxonomy at the website...
I'm not sure that it's Lepidoptera sp. But we've got something like that there :)
I need some help to identify this species, please. Maybe Formica rufa?
I have no use for the joint markers too.
It's done.
The new species for the region, correct me if I'm wrong. And no illustrations for the Choreutis diana until now :)
Autosuggestions' headers will be switching to English correctly from now on.
Getting tired of conflicted information. The species was added according to ZIN representation.
Did it.
It's one of a fancy photo, not identified and nobody could it done before ;-)
I see a lot of things are attached to this marker, but the point itself isn't there. I suggest you do this: Irek, put a new marker, don't link anything to it, then give me the number, and I will replace the binding of all photos that were linked to the same marker as this one (photo 65191) with the binding to the new marker. I think this is the fastest option.
Ok, I've removed the double.
The species was transferred to Kamalia in April, 2017.
Alex, what's your opinion on the matter?
The photo was transferred to Pardoxia graellsi, but only in August 2017 :-)
Can somebody to confirm that this is not one of Anadrymadusa retowskii?
Alexey Matov refers this species to the genus Bryoxena.
The audit was Carried Out On 01.09.2017 According To: https://www.biolib.cz/en/taxon/id1211207/
With one-word ones, of course, there will be problems with any intersections from the real world in noticeable quantities. For childbirth, by the way, sp should help well.
Ok, I've got it. I can't share the facebook photos here (
Glitches are fixed. Now you should have all the photos from that index.
It should have been much steeper -the Pamir part fell out due to mountain sickness in one of the participants.
Currently, the species belongs to the genus Glabroculus Lvovsky, 1993.
Defined by S. Korb as Eumedonia persephatta.
This taxon now belongs to the genus Alpherakya Tuzov, 1993.
Thank you, Evgeny.
Thank you.
Thank you, Alexander.
Thank you, Vasili
Peter, we will assume that I have already given an answer to this question in my comment from 24.08.2017 8: 12. where I wrote that a single photo of the view of the view in a year will clearly not hurt the site. Or has anyone else put this view before me, this season? I don't remember." If I'm wrong, show me another photo from this season that was uploaded before me. In general, all this began ...
Tell me how to send a parcel with insects in an entomological box without damaging them. all carefully prick with needles and wrap the box with at least one layer of polyurethane foam (or analog) up to 1 cm in a layer (preferably in 2 layers) . So I sent up to 3 boxes to Italy at once and received them back more than once (up to 1 thousand mounted copies) . The percentage of breakdowns is about ...
It really looks like Serika. They usually fly to the light-could fly through the window at night, if production is going on.
Beautiful, but even better live :) I first saw it in nature.
I see, thanks)
It's a pity I didn't collect it (although I saw it for the first time), but only took a picture :) Is it rare in the near Moscow region? Here: http://insectamo.ru/micro/106-mikrocheshuekrylye/crambidae/1969-ecpyrrhorrhoe-rubiginalis it generally consists only of Lichens (this is almost the Ryazan region). it is worth..... And on the site her photo is not enough.
Hello everyone.Who is interested in any insects from the Stavropol Territory?I'll be able to pick up books and look at local literature.I invite you to cooperate.It is possible to accompany you on an expedition if you come to visit us.I am fond of photos and observations of insects.Write your thoughts, ideas, and requests.I'll be glad to.This post was edited by Opatrum - 19.08.2017 15: 55
News
- 17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
- 11.11.2024: The Community/Forum section has become more convenient
- 11.11.2024: Improved scaling of images in the Forum/Community
New photos (22.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 15:51, A. Kuzmin: Подскажите, к кому обратиться за по...
- 11:29, P. Khramov: Not identified → Conocephalus fuscu...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Entomological seminar in Moscow on November 13
- 20th International Insect Fair in Moscow (Russia, October 2023)
- Interview with Alexander Zatakovoy, one of the wild Russian entomologists
- 17th Annual Texas Butterfly Festival to be held October 25—28 in Texas, US
