All Insecta.pro Comments

Community and Forum → All comments feed
All the latest comments on topics, photos and species on the site in reverse chronological order.
Show: All comments in a row. All comments, except for the technical ones.

Pages: 1 ...587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595... 630

13.01.2011 0:50, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #2923

Species added, photo moved.

13.01.2011 0:39, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3800

Goes from "undetermined" to "uncertain".

13.01.2011 0:38, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3839

Still left in "uncertain".

13.01.2011 0:37, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3841

Moved.

13.01.2011 0:31, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3407

Ok then, moved to A. adippe.

13.01.2011 0:15, Peter Khramov: comment on Spam

The filter is, simply need to update it regularly for new templates. If it were not, the spam would valilsya mountain ... With regards to the authors - as anti-spam method, of course, is good, but should be able to nezaregannye threads and comments, and news (but not foty and types). Therefore, while it is not necessary to separate.In general, I will do what is possible under the present ...

12.01.2011 23:58, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3239

Moved then.

12.01.2011 23:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3980

This species is identified correctly.

12.01.2011 22:40, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3930

Guy moved to males.

12.01.2011 22:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #2577

This species is identified correctly.

12.01.2011 22:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3069

This species is identified correctly.

12.01.2011 22:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3012

This species is identified correctly.

12.01.2011 22:15, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #4177

This species is identified correctly.

12.01.2011 19:42, Peter Khramov: comment on 32 new photos

Yes, it is strange. These two types of back, will have another look / check out other ...

12.01.2011 19:40, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #4019

Photo goes to Z. minos as well as images nearby, status "uncertain".

12.01.2011 15:47, Peter Khramov: comment on Gathering of binding to type some unpublished photos

Last night and this morning my fault could come loose binding to type some unpublished photos. The names of species remain so today, everything will be restored, do not need to elaborate.

12.01.2011 14:10, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #4161

This species is identified correctly.

12.01.2011 2:12, Peter Khramov: comment on Increased ease of search and download pictures

Now and in the search box the site and in the "Name of the species" of uploading photos, the search is not only for the main Latin and Russian names, but in Latin synonyms, as well as additional Russian names. School example: hives can be called Aglais urticae , but you can Vanessa urticae .Previously, if you type «vanes» hives we would not have found. Now - find. However, the feature is ...

12.01.2011 0:23, Peter Khramov: comment on Upload photos to the new species and new species themselves

By the way, with multiple birth until now it has been a poser - views were activated, while they themselves were just kind of in the database. Now everything is fixed, including and the reason for the appearance, so that more of these things is not expected ...

11.01.2011 15:16, Peter Khramov: comment on About superfamily, subfamilies, and a simplified classification Online

Originally built on the base O. Karsholt, J. Razowski (eds.), 1996. The Lepidoptera of Europe: a distributional chacklist. Changes: 1. adds a new species, which are on the list was not (not Europe) and 2. Data is deprecated, changed. But both of these points as a percentage is not very high. Alexander Zhakov proposed focus on http://www.faunaeur.org catalog or blue. In fact, the problem is that ...

11.01.2011 8:35, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #1840

This species is identified correctly.

11.01.2011 8:35, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #1838

This species is identified correctly.

11.01.2011 8:35, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #1839

This species is identified correctly.

11.01.2011 8:35, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #3601

This species is identified correctly.

11.01.2011 2:48, Peter Khramov: comment on Adding information to the pages of birth

Now, on page sort but his name is also available information about the author and the year of first description (if available in the database of the site).

11.01.2011 1:11, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #4050

Moved.

11.01.2011 1:10, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #4051

Moved then.

10.01.2011 20:07, Николай Пичугин: comment on

Хоть я и новенький на этом форуме-но не поздравить не могу!Самое главное здоровья а всё остальное будет!Сергей Пичугин.Спасибо, Сергей!Сколько у меня однофамильцев, однако! Вроде и не Иванов...

10.01.2011 17:38, Peter Khramov: comment on Help section on the site and a couple of other little things

Rhode corrected, thanks for the tip. Regarding subfamilies - in general, yes, ideally, should be included and the subfamily, and other tribes, the benefit of that information about many of them in the database actually is. But this opportunity, I plan to connect a little later, when the classification of online order forms, and some of whom will follow this order.

10.01.2011 15:50, MIV: comment on

Amphipyra sergei Staudinger, 1888Редчайший вид! В России известен только из Алтайского края и из Омской области!Данный экземпляр: г. Омск, 10.08.2009.Если интересно.Окр. Красноярска (ст. Кача), тайга. Июль 2010г. Единственная находка И.С. ...

10.01.2011 15:16, Peter Khramov: comment on A slight improvement in the system of loading pictures

Previously, in the field "Name of the species" must be entered (even with autocomplete) the Latin name of the species, and nothing more - only in this case, the photo is automatically picks up to the desired form. Otherwise - the name of the photo was from, but it could mean only hitch admin.Now, if you would like to avoid typing the name and use the auto-complete and easy skopipastit it from ...

10.01.2011 14:43, Peter Khramov: comment on Fixed problem with the generation of a preview when loading larger photos

When loading large pictures previously could not be generated previews (in a private office in this case appear the names of species instead of thumbnails), and instead reports a successful startup in the browser could be given a blank white page. Most of this should not be.If someone suddenly appears again - always signaled in the "community" or by mail. Dmitry Pozhogin Viktor Titov - note, ...

10.01.2011 13:25, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3991

Moved then.

10.01.2011 2:31, Peter Khramov: comment on New data in the "Authors"

Now, on the public page of this section available information about the number of photos and / or comments on the types and photos published by each of the authors. With the number of pictures is a link to author's gallery, a number of comments - all comments on photos and descriptions of the types made by the author. For the time being we have 78 people ...

10.01.2011 0:19, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #4036

Went to Agapeta hamana.

10.01.2011 0:18, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #4012

Goes then to Zerynthia polyxena.

10.01.2011 0:17, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #4047

Moved to Maniola jurtina.

09.01.2011 23:58, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #4027

Danke, goes to Polyommatus icarus.

09.01.2011 23:57, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #4053

Ok then, moved.

09.01.2011 23:56, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3818

Photo goes to A. straminella.

09.01.2011 23:39, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #4028

Aha, moved to.

09.01.2011 21:13, Peter Khramov: comment on 145 new photos

Accordingly, the catalog of the base added 37 new species.

09.01.2011 20:48, Vlad Proklov: comment on photo #3955

Yes, that is Euproctis similis.

09.01.2011 19:14, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #3966

This species is identified correctly.

09.01.2011 19:02, Peter Khramov: comment on For those who are going to load a large number of photons at a time

The maximum for a week there should be a function of batch file uploads (approximately - in zip-archive) followed prostanovkoy information for each photo.In case you wish to download many photos, this feature can save a lot of time, so I recommend to wait vysheozvuchennogo light moment, and then shipping. The news was voiced as to be ready.

09.01.2011 18:03, Nikolai Vladimirov: comment on photo #3347

I've got it later that there was no need to choose any status to comment photo :)

09.01.2011 11:51, Peter Khramov: comment on Upload photos butterfly species that are not in the website base

Lord, those photos of new species that have already been loaded will be properly handled. Moreover, if someone does not see the message and now load a photo, it will also be normally processed - it's not so tough ...