Community and Forum → All comments feed
All the latest comments on topics, photos and species on the site in reverse chronological order.
Show: All comments in a row. All comments, except for the technical ones.
Pages: 1 ...111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119... 627
Corrected data. Athous (Haplathous) belloi Guglielmi & Platia, 1985 → Athous belloi Guglielmi & Platia, 1985.
Corrected data. Athous (Euplathous) iablokoffi Leseigneur, 1972 → Athous iablokoffi Leseigneur, 1972.
Corrected data. Athous (Haplathous) mollis Reitter, 1889 → Athous (Anathrotus) mollis Reitter, 1889.
Corrected data. Athous (Haplathous) lepontinus Schwarz, 1900 → Athous (Anathrotus) lepontinus Schwarz, 1900.
Corrected data. Athous (Haplathous) laevistriatus (Dufour, 1851) → Athous (Anathrotus) laevistriatus (Dufour, 1851).
Corrected data. Athous (Haplathous) emaciatus Candèze, 1860 → Athous (Anathrotus) emaciatus Candèze, 1860.
Corrected data. Athous (Haplathous) carpathicus Reitter, 1905 → Athous (Anathrotus) carpathicus Reitter, 1905.
Corrected data. Athous (Haplathous) cachecticus Candèze, 1860 → Athous (Anathrotus) cachecticus Candèze, 1860.
I sell larvae of African beetles Pachnoda efippiata and Pachnoda abyssinica at the price of 1100 rubles for 20 larvae. Beetles are beautiful, active, and there are no problems with reproduction. Pictures:DSCF5893.JPG — (3.76мб) DSCF6154.JPG — (3.54 mb)
Corrected data. Selatosomus glaucus (Germar, 1843) → Selatosomus (Hadromorphus) glaucus (Germar, 1843).
Corrected data. Actenicerus (Actenicerus) infirmus (Reitter, 1892) → Actenicerus (Acnitecerus) infirmus (Reitter, 1892).
Thanks!The main thing-flour and cookies will not eat!)) I was confused not by the obvious sawing of the antennae
For A. dichotomus, , - I didn't find a snapshot either. Only the pic is in the determinant and it is different. But nothing, there will be material, it will be possible to compare species over time. Maybe one of the entomologists will throw it off. Complicating matters is that many leaf wrappers only describe the genitals and not a word about their appearance.
Vasily, it's simple. This is the 1st uploaded image, there were doubts. Then I searched the Internet again and came to the conclusion that we can definitely talk about the form. See the link below for more information about why it's not fun. http://blog.tamagaro.net/?p=3418. By the way, there is also a question on it, I just saw it now. If anyone has any doubts or links, please write to us.