Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586... 629

21.02.2011 19:21, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6241

Moved/activated.

21.02.2011 19:21, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6233

Moved.

21.02.2011 18:24, Peter Khramov: comment on In the course of discussing the status of the genus Protesilaus and beyond.

On funetah, I look, too, is cut ...

21.02.2011 13:12, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6215

Done too.

21.02.2011 13:11, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6231

Done.

21.02.2011 13:10, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6228

Photo moved.

21.02.2011 13:10, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6216

Shot moved, G. cinga activated.

21.02.2011 13:09, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6213

Ok then, ready to go.

21.02.2011 13:09, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6234

Moved.

21.02.2011 13:08, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6210

To go.

21.02.2011 13:08, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6280

Photo moved to A. armida, adjacent species activated.

21.02.2011 13:07, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6259

Photo moved, species activated.

21.02.2011 13:07, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6208

Shot moved. Evgeny, why approved? To up the shot or?

21.02.2011 1:18, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6229

Moved.

20.02.2011 23:04, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6341

Moved.

20.02.2011 19:26, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6226

Leaves "undetermined".

20.02.2011 19:25, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5074

Moved to "identified successfully".

20.02.2011 19:24, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6221

Ok then, moved.

20.02.2011 19:24, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6260

Moved and activated.

20.02.2011 19:24, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6344

Moved and activated.

20.02.2011 19:18, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6243

Photo moved, species activated.

20.02.2011 19:17, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6202

Moved to G. guttipalpis.

20.02.2011 18:38, Peter Khramov: comment on Need a Ru→En translator with knowledge of insects/butterflies

Based on the test results, I selected two performers. I sent emails today to everyone who sent me options and didn't immediately notify them that they weren't suitable. In each letter, I quoted the translations that were selected, so that each of the participants could understand what the choice was based on.If you suddenly didn't answer someone, but you still want to see the "winning" options, ...

20.02.2011 18:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on Protesilaus protesilaus

I like it more http://www.butterfliesofamerica.com Opler & Warren, 2003 Butterflies of North America. Scott, James A., 1986; The Butterflies of North America

20.02.2011 12:20, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #6279

This species is identified correctly.

19.02.2011 22:49, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6262

Went to L. fimbriaria.

19.02.2011 22:49, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6313

Goes to H. docis. Cool pic, by the way.

19.02.2011 22:48, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6290

Moved.

19.02.2011 22:47, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6278

To go.

19.02.2011 22:47, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6219

Moved.

19.02.2011 22:44, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6203

Goes to M. januaris.

19.02.2011 22:44, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6287

Poor thing... Moved.

19.02.2011 22:43, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6286

Shot moved.

19.02.2011 22:42, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6283

To go.

19.02.2011 22:42, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6284

Went to R. erycina.

19.02.2011 22:41, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6364

Moved.

19.02.2011 22:40, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #2806

Moved to males.

19.02.2011 18:06, Seneka: comment on How to identify insects

I will contribute my five kopecks to the discussion. In some determinants, the authors are quite free with plesiomorphic and apomorphic features. Probably, when compiling them, they didn't even bother with their status and eligibility for use. As a result, there are often parallel branches in the definition tables, in which the same signs are repeated, and often not only the same, but also fuzzy, ...