Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571... 627
I can order dry stuff. I'll charge you money for the delivery and search for the right insects. I'm currently in Malaysia and will be in Thailand in a few days. I'll be in Moscow in a week.
Moved.
No comments from Vlad yet, so the shot goes to Xanthorhoe quadrifasciata now. Will correct it, if needed.
Check out plantago's library. I did. But it's in German.
Proctos, thanks for the list. The number of features is impressive. Still, there is so much data to dig up...
Not so lately the system of shot dates was reconstructed, so now we can see just "1977" year, with no details...
Cicadetta montana is known from the vicinity of St. Petersburg, but only locally - on the Duderhof heights. This year, their exuviae were collected there by colleagues in early summer. Where it came from there is another question. Either it is a relic of the Holocene optimum, or an introduced one (under Catherine II, trees from the Carpathians were planted there). But it is very far from Okhta to ...
Could someone from Kiev bring a few boxes of butterflies from Moscow to Kiev and give them to my Kiev friend?
Moved to "uncertain". Hopefully, that's it: no such photos at the website.
Thanks, goes to M. ferrago.
Ok, moved to L. sticticalis.
Moved to L. anella.
Thanks, moved.
To go.
Got here on the occasion of a male ornithoptera Rothschild with steamed wings. It sticks out in the sump-and it is not comme il faut to expose it and it is a pity to throw it away. Can I restore the color somehow?
This species is identified correctly.
Bzzzzzzz.
Dark and scary.
The nearby shot is http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/10010/.
As well as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/10012/.
Lepidurus, I assume L. batesoni. And where was he caught? Just this type for the south of Western Siberia is given. Although probably Triops granarius from Transbaikalia is more suitable.This post was edited by botanque - 30.08.2011 23: 05
The underside of #10303 shot.
Ok, moved.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
It's not the tail who is the main.
Ok, will be male then.
Moved.
Ok, if sure, goes to "identified successfully".
Moved to T. comae (as well as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/2045/).
Ok then, corrected this and nearby ones.
Meh, right. Corrected.
Female.
Male.
Male.
Male.
Female.
To go.
Moved.
To go.
Moved to laterana, uncertain.
Yep, corrected.
Corrected.
Shot moved to A. aescularia.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
Moved to argus. As for retouching, there should be some limits. For instance, paphia shots are definitely too "art" and not real. Such intense colors as you can see on this shot are rather usual and even default for some digital cameras. Even though for this very photo author did it manually. As for "art" sections and the idea in general, let's look at this on the other hand. I think, we lack ...
Moved from undetermined to uncertain.
People, please be careful when adding views. If the database is already synonymous, then you need to bind the new kind to him, and not to add new species to the database separately. Accordingly, this type I have renamed, deleted and new.
Ok, moved.
News
- 17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
- 11.11.2024: The Community/Forum section has become more convenient
- 11.11.2024: Improved scaling of images in the Forum/Community
New photos (24.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 11:36, V. Titov: Я имел в виду страницу "Лента всех ...
- 21:22, A. Dymchenko: Не перенесено вот это сообщение и в...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Entomological seminar in Moscow on November 13
- Meantime in Japan
- The petition in defense of biological nomenclature
- It's dinner time... in prison
