Pages: 1 ...461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469... 627
By JW I give in and apologize that butted, but it reminds me more aceris (if intermedia its subspecies) or auricoma: both if you believe the notorious Sinev should be there.
Grounds: 1) http://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/140-Euthalia/Euthalia-aconthea 2) http://michibikuhikari.blogspot.ru/2012/09/doubutsu-no-kuni.html (scroll down).
What for? Although I contact him today. You can in fact write the label if the data is there for it (as done in this butterfly).
Ok, corrected. ZY Double dog to work and of comments on the pages of the same types of use, if there is a need:Gortyna fortis.
Corrected data. Not identified / Male → Dysphania transducta / Confidently identified / Imago / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Well, Vasily, I uchtu your comments, and take away the question marks. Thank you for your view definition.
It was in the admin as the infinitive, and in the name of the species were a few question marks, so get an author photo. That same situation if the author boot neoprene. kind of rearrange daw "just-inaccurate".
Yes, that means that a good number 1039, it made a mistake in 1049, here in 1139 again made a mistake :)
Corrected data. Not identified → Alpenus investigatorum / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Alpenus investigatorum / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Nyctemera tripunctaria / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Nyctemera tripunctaria / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
I live in Asia. Although I do not see the need to study what is nearby. It is interesting to study what is interesting, not what is at hand.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Lymantria lunata / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Yes, it's from someone volnyanok. And even of the tribe Orgyiini the goose is likely. Sorry, then pass ....
Vasily I try not to define Saturn is worse than a bunch of pictures :) hawk moths, and do not always correspond. Thanks for the answer, I just want to embed the view from the source on what it determines that, there were no misunderstandings.
Wild Yuri, I will certainly write something very inconvenient again right now.. but I've spent some time reading some of the articles on the website of this American society.. including how they understand entomology and what their society does. You know, they really do science there! Look, it's written here in the booklethttp://entsoc.org/discover-entomologyIt says that entomology is the science ...
When identifying by pic, mistakes can be done, all we're doing here is just share our suppositions about species, the more approximate the more similar and close in colour species are. I have a great respect to Matov, still identifying by pics gives just a supposition about species, and that's basically good. Moved. Doubts kept though :)
Corrected data. Not identified → Hypomecis crassestrigata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Hello I give you the photo of C.oberthuri from Spain Jean-Paul Herzet Belgium www.lepidopexchange.com