Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121... 145
It's not the tail who is the main.
To T. griseata, "uncertain" then?
Ok, will be male then.
To hyale, uncertain, or?
Moved.
To "uncertain"?
Sure?
Goes to "uncertain". Neither the author was sure enough. If shot location needed, I can ask, but that's most probably Ukraine...
Ok, if sure, goes to "identified successfully".
Moved to T. comae (as well as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/2045/).
Gah. Took all photos away from the species :--(
Ok then, corrected this and nearby ones.
Opposite to what? Muale?
Meh, right. Corrected.
To go.
Moved.
Moved.
To go.
Moved to laterana, uncertain.
Nearby too? http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/2046/.
Yep, corrected.
Corrected.
Most probably Moscow region, but I asked Vitaly to check it, just in case.
Shot moved to A. aescularia.
Ok, changed.
Moved to argus. As for retouching, there should be some limits. For instance, paphia shots are definitely too "art" and not real. Such intense colors as you can see on this shot are rather usual and even default for some digital cameras. Even though for this very photo author did it manually. As for "art" sections and the idea in general, let's look at this on the other hand. I think, we lack ...
Moved from undetermined to uncertain.
People, please be careful when adding views. If the database is already synonymous, then you need to bind the new kind to him, and not to add new species to the database separately. Accordingly, this type I have renamed, deleted and new.
Ok, moved.
Moved.
Moved to L. phlaeas.
Goes to Polygonia.
Moved to H. gallii.
Thanks, moved.
Agree, but it's not candidate to be identified though.
Bah, that's why it's still there.
Moved to females.
"Botanical" is not slang, either I'm not a boy for many years :--) "Botanical" photography means that such shots can be in a botanical textbook. This doesn't mean anything bad, I just didn't find a right word to say that shorter and properer. If you have one, give me a sign... As for the photographic point of view, please, be free, comment also this, not only species. As for defective works, I ...
Looking at the author's location, think, that can be Ukraine. As for the author himself, he is not professional entomologist, so he might just have looked through similar pics, that's all. Anyway, that's just a guess.
Ceramica pisi?
Ceramica pisi?
Author suggests that's Cnaemidophorus rhododactylus, but...
Author suggests that's Cnaemidophorus rhododactylus, but...
"Kisa & Osya" version was also good. Especially, along with a traffic jam)
Moved.
Surely female?
Meh, this one also goes there...
Thanks for noticing, moved.
Ok, moved.
Evgeny, approve Favonius taxila?
Next page