E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26... 144

11.09.2017 16:12, Peter Khramov: comment on Paralasa

A good question for supervising this case. I'll get in touch with Stas and ask him how he is today.

10.09.2017 20:57, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #2812

Corrected data.

10.09.2017 20:57, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #2812

Corrected data. Papilio menatius → Papilio menatius victorinus.

10.09.2017 16:04, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #58805

Shamil, what is slash about? Synonyms or just one of the species?

09.09.2017 19:55, Peter Khramov: comment on Euchalcia shugnana

The subspecies has been deleted.

08.09.2017 13:46, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #67169

Vladimir Zryanin, our Formicidae curator, will be online early October and he'll able to help with identification then.

08.09.2017 12:49, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #67173

Shamil, I'll indicate you as identification author since Victor is not registered website user, right?

08.09.2017 0:54, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #67137

Guys, clap eyes on Dmitry's photos from interesting locations.

07.09.2017 11:59, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #66905

It's done.

06.09.2017 22:09, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #66555

Did it.

06.09.2017 22:05, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #67019

To tentatively identified meanwhile?

06.09.2017 20:20, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #67095

Alex, see to Admin section, there is species name and a couple more photos there...

06.09.2017 20:12, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5032

There are many, indeed. But what with this one?)

06.09.2017 16:24, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #65191

I see a lot of things are attached to this marker, but the point itself isn't there. I suggest you do this: Irek, put a new marker, don't link anything to it, then give me the number, and I will replace the binding of all photos that were linked to the same marker as this one (photo 65191) with the binding to the new marker. I think this is the fastest option.

06.09.2017 12:56, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #66918

Ok, I've removed the double.

05.09.2017 21:46, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #65191

Brr. I don't understand. There is a link to the point, but the point itself is not present. Irek, how did this happen?..

05.09.2017 21:11, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5048

If there are no objections, I propose to move photo to the species.

05.09.2017 21:11, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #61620

Vasiliy, what do you say?

05.09.2017 21:09, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5032

Remove maybe? Or it's not a dead end?

05.09.2017 21:08, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #62623

Dmitry, check it please.

05.09.2017 12:20, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #65191

OK, it seems to have dawned on me what's going on here. I'll edit it today.

03.09.2017 22:19, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #66897

Dima should be added to the site soon. Maybe he can help with the definition.

01.09.2017 21:30, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #65191

Why not? Just go to the photos page and put a stop to it.

31.08.2017 16:42, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #66795

Wow, that's geography.

28.08.2017 13:32, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #66575

Vasily, if I understood correctly, the question was why to upload photo # 42 for a view that has a lot of images on the site, including from similar geo points. P. S. In general, this is a question for the second gallery, as already discussed...

25.08.2017 16:44, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #66575

With the search it is clear, but with the opening of individual pages-mark the time and came a couple of links (not counting the main one) pliz. The browser doesn't matter here.

24.08.2017 21:28, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #66575

What exactly is inhibition expressed in?

23.08.2017 23:04, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #66575

By the way, there is never much free space on the site.

14.08.2017 23:57, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #66339

Perhaps Elena didn't mean "butterfly or moth?", but "butterfly or moth?" (i.e. butterfly or moth). In this case, it is a moth.

30.07.2017 14:50, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #66245

Male!

27.07.2017 14:48, Peter Khramov: comment on Delia hirticrura

Gentlemen, if anyone has information from decent sources on this type, add pliz.

26.07.2017 23:48, Peter Khramov: comment on Garella musculana

People, if anyone has information on this view from the agricultural point of view, send it to a friend...

19.07.2017 11:24, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #66175

Moving to Adela?

12.07.2017 15:56, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #66057

At the end of July, there will probably be a reason to return to the issues of curation in general. Then, I think, we will solve the problem in one way or another.

17.06.2017 20:53, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #2829

This is the Zagreb Museum, they might have a somewhat less responsible attitude for the identification and confirmation...

30.04.2017 13:59, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #25021

Done.

23.03.2017 10:47, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #63775

People, the view is not obtained or the nymphalidniks are invalid now?

13.01.2017 2:10, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #61762

Corrected data. Imago → Male & female.

10.01.2017 13:15, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #61723

I don't know if it's related or not, but now it seems that there is a glitch with auto-substitutions. People, do wildcards work for you?

09.01.2017 20:24, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #61724

Corrected data.

06.01.2017 14:23, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #61060

I mean, with the copyright? You yourself transferred it first to Heteroptera, then to Erthesina. Or had she already been somewhere else?

03.01.2017 2:57, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #60118

Yes, Igor doesn't have a license. Changed my photo.

27.12.2016 22:37, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #61354

Vasily, please note that Yuri may not even know what "groups" are:--)

27.12.2016 21:21, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #61354

Vasily, add Yuri's views (or link them).

26.12.2016 11:37, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #60118

Igor, isn't there an opportunity for these photos in the LK?

24.12.2016 22:01, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #61014

Ask me to visit you with a camera, or something...:--)

24.12.2016 20:37, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #60780

In BOS write to chela...

24.12.2016 20:33, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #46348

The proger that did the main part of linking to maps has not yet gone into unconsciousness, so editing the code for maps is still in a suspended state. But I'll try to finish it off or do it on my own.

24.12.2016 20:31, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #61014

Vasily, put a pair with the definition to the genus at least b!

24.12.2016 20:31, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #42013

I put a comment on the photo. I removed it from the species page.

Next page

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.