Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27... 145
There are many, indeed. But what with this one?)
I see a lot of things are attached to this marker, but the point itself isn't there. I suggest you do this: Irek, put a new marker, don't link anything to it, then give me the number, and I will replace the binding of all photos that were linked to the same marker as this one (photo 65191) with the binding to the new marker. I think this is the fastest option.
Ok, I've removed the double.
Brr. I don't understand. There is a link to the point, but the point itself is not present. Irek, how did this happen?..
If there are no objections, I propose to move photo to the species.
Vasiliy, what do you say?
Remove maybe? Or it's not a dead end?
Dmitry, check it please.
OK, it seems to have dawned on me what's going on here. I'll edit it today.
Dima should be added to the site soon. Maybe he can help with the definition.
Why not? Just go to the photos page and put a stop to it.
Wow, that's geography.
Vasily, if I understood correctly, the question was why to upload photo # 42 for a view that has a lot of images on the site, including from similar geo points. P. S. In general, this is a question for the second gallery, as already discussed...
With the search it is clear, but with the opening of individual pages-mark the time and came a couple of links (not counting the main one) pliz. The browser doesn't matter here.
What exactly is inhibition expressed in?
By the way, there is never much free space on the site.
Perhaps Elena didn't mean "butterfly or moth?", but "butterfly or moth?" (i.e. butterfly or moth). In this case, it is a moth.
Male!
Gentlemen, if anyone has information from decent sources on this type, add pliz.
People, if anyone has information on this view from the agricultural point of view, send it to a friend...
Moving to Adela?
At the end of July, there will probably be a reason to return to the issues of curation in general. Then, I think, we will solve the problem in one way or another.
This is the Zagreb Museum, they might have a somewhat less responsible attitude for the identification and confirmation...
Done.
People, the view is not obtained or the nymphalidniks are invalid now?
Corrected data. Imago → Male & female.
I don't know if it's related or not, but now it seems that there is a glitch with auto-substitutions. People, do wildcards work for you?
Corrected data.
I mean, with the copyright? You yourself transferred it first to Heteroptera, then to Erthesina. Or had she already been somewhere else?
Yes, Igor doesn't have a license. Changed my photo.
Vasily, please note that Yuri may not even know what "groups" are:--)
Vasily, add Yuri's views (or link them).
Igor, isn't there an opportunity for these photos in the LK?
Ask me to visit you with a camera, or something...:--)
In BOS write to chela...
The proger that did the main part of linking to maps has not yet gone into unconsciousness, so editing the code for maps is still in a suspended state. But I'll try to finish it off or do it on my own.
Vasily, put a pair with the definition to the genus at least b!
I put a comment on the photo. I removed it from the species page.
Corrected data. Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow → Favonius / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow → Scolitantides orion / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow → Anania coronata / Irina Nikulina.
Alexander, do you have any objections?
Corrected data. Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham → Comostola laesaria / Irina Nikulina.
Alexander, did you manage Skype? It would be necessary to connect all the same...
Alexander, regarding the division of the site — for this there is a Lepidoptera button at the top right of any page (for temporary switching to the display mode of the desired squad) or the corresponding setting in the LC (for permanent switching). After all, it was made long ago at the request of TV viewers... Vasily, as for the add-ons for the site — you're right, I've been slowing down ...
The taxons were merged. Neozephyrus smaragdinus and Chrysozephyrus smaragdinus were merged.
The taxons were merged. Neozephyrus brillantinus and Chrysozephyrus brillantinus were merged.
Then, perhaps, in inaccurate ones?
To whom it does not give, and to whom it gives. Another photo of the same individual is also available.
Vasily, why do you think that the photo is in an additional gallery? As far as I can see, it is in quite a basic one. Brackets are placed, done.
News
- 17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
- 11.11.2024: The Community/Forum section has become more convenient
- 11.11.2024: Improved scaling of images in the Forum/Community
New photos (22.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 22:10, A. Dymchenko: Пётр, да, она, спасибо. Там, как я...
- 18:43, A. Kuzmin: Ещё несколько перепонов из Амурской...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Entomological seminar in Moscow on November 13
- Meanwhile, in Kotelnich
- Streets: insects names
- It's butterfly time: family program in Pennsylvania and Westonbirt Arboretum’s Treefest, UK
