Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468... 627

20.02.2014 14:18, Lev Bely: comment on photo #27718

Prayer hour.

20.02.2014 12:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27729

Corrected data. Not identified → Syllepte segnalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

20.02.2014 10:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27719

Slightly seen reed abdomen in its sides. Too Chionarctia nivea. Synev describes it in 5 regions, 36th, 37th, 38th, 39th, 40th... I've got it as well in my collection :)

20.02.2014 10:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27717

Corrected data. Not identified → Cerura felina / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

19.02.2014 22:24, Sergei Kotov: comment on photo #11755

That's it. Just emerged and spreading its wings, thus the habitus seems kind of weird.

19.02.2014 21:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27185

A white, supposedly Pareronia genus or something similar. Rare pic, don't want to keep this in not identified. Have been digging this already a few days, can't find. Anyone knows?

19.02.2014 21:35, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27713

Corrected data. Not identified → Thyrgorina boghaika / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.02.2014 16:15, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #26305

The specimen was IDed as E.unicolorella then updated as E. elutella. Tough family and genus, not sure of this new ID, no sense to move it from species to species :)

19.02.2014 15:59, Sergei Kotov: comment on photo #11756

Cabera pusaria

19.02.2014 14:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27716

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

19.02.2014 13:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27636

I'm still at 7:44 asked Eugene, what to do and waited for an answer. But as you can see: spurred :) Frankly, if it were moved the MoD, would without question. In no other area of my Ochlodes not fly :) This in fact I trust: http://insectamo.ru/rhop/33-rhop/hesperiidae/30-hesperiidae

19.02.2014 12:36, Sergei Kotov: comment on photo #20634

Vasily, I didn't offer any versions on what's this species. Just noted that this photo features the specimen quite well (despite two other pics of the specimen).

19.02.2014 8:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Bastilla arctotaenia

Read on old Dysgonia. The truth is it's not my favorite Wikipedia, but here, in the section "Former species" is painted like a who's who is now: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dysgonia

19.02.2014 2:20, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27711

This species is identified correctly.

19.02.2014 2:18, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27708

Corrected data. Not identified → Syngrapha interrogationis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.02.2014 1:56, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27710

Corrected data. Not identified → Deltote uncula / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.02.2014 1:52, Peter Khramov: comment on Dendrolimus superans

MOVED.

19.02.2014 1:47, Peter Khramov: comment on Amphipyra schrenсkii

Fixed, excess removed.

19.02.2014 1:44, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #11252

Corrected data. Andrey Ponomarev → Vlad Proklov.

19.02.2014 1:40, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #27472

Let's keep this.

19.02.2014 1:20, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #26227

And I can not answer if you do not know the correct answer? and uncertain to hang until decide :)

19.02.2014 0:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27031

Corrected data. Not identified → Erionota torus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.02.2014 0:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #26950

Corrected data. Not identified → Erionota torus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.02.2014 0:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21222

Corrected data. Not identified → Tanaorhinus viridiluteata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.02.2014 18:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #20633

Eudocima sp. Impossible to ID the species with this pic.

18.02.2014 18:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #22453

Calpinae Quite ragged Eudocima sp.? My diagnosis is that's impossible to ID the species with this pic...... Alas :(

18.02.2014 18:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #23540

Corrected data. Not identified → Eressa confinis / Confidently identified / Svetlana Shchavelina.

18.02.2014 17:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #23821

Corrected data. Not identified → Ophthalmis milete / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.02.2014 14:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Bastilla fulvotaenia

According to the blue of the formDysgonia maturatacalled Bastilla maturata (Walker, 1858) Here it is necessary to remove from Dysgonia place here and now as Bastilla.

18.02.2014 14:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21192

Moved to tentatively identified accroding to the author's comment. Looks more of T. subocellata: http://www.noctuidae.de/page/art/89_0762.html. There's also another wikipedia pic (don't like it personally but nearly no pics on the web): http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Targalla_subocellata_(Noctuidae_Euteliinae).jpg

18.02.2014 13:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27616

Thanks, so Pyralidae. I was looking for in Barsine as usual :)

18.02.2014 13:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27617

Corrected data. Not identified → Heortia vitessoides / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.02.2014 13:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27640

Ectropis lutamentaria (Graeser, 1888) with funeta apparently was driven instead of Sinev: http://ftp.funet.fi/index/Tree_of_life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/geometroidea/geometridae/ennominae/ectropis/index.html There is still full of such inconsistencies due to lack of uniform classification of the site.

18.02.2014 13:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27668

Corrected data. Not identified → Athyma perius / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.02.2014 13:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27667

Corrected data. Not identified → Athyma perius / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.02.2014 13:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27674

Sorry, not again put so defined.

18.02.2014 10:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27675

Corrected data. Not identified → Clostera anachoreta / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.02.2014 10:22, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27673

Corrected data. Not identified → Amphipyra perflua / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.02.2014 7:44, Alexander Belousov: comment on photo #27669

Yeah, right! Sorry! You already said that.

18.02.2014 3:43, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27671

Corrected data. Not identified → Hypena tristalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.02.2014 3:21, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27219

Corrected data. Not identified → Mythimna velutina / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.02.2014 1:19, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27666

Corrected data. Not identified → Paradiarsia punicea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.02.2014 1:04, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #27670

+1 :)

17.02.2014 23:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Bastilla

The final touch: it is necessary to remove komenty here and ready to race :)

17.02.2014 19:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27642

Well, where shall I go from here :) It's just nerves play tricks on all recently dissolved concoctions (and not only from her). Very poor become: old probably ... :( After the site is already almost five years and I already can not live without it :)

17.02.2014 18:25, Sergei Kotov: comment on photo #9728

In this photo agree with Alexander, I looked closely (and in comparison with the above features) photo, and yes, it still Plusia festucae.

17.02.2014 17:59, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27663

Corrected data. Not identified → Actebia praecurrens / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.02.2014 13:41, Svetlana Shchavelina: comment on photo #13318

As for the pictures ... I understand that in this case they are first placed on the service side to save photos (eg www.photobucket.com) or any other resource, and then the address of this photo is filled by pressing the "picture from another site" . From my personal experience.As moderator of a very large resource with experience of 8 years and the owner of its own website, which is already 5 ...