Pages: 1 ...61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69... 169
Basil, I did not quite understand the question. There is no doubt that these are different images? So they are very different background which photographed the butterfly. At least look at the bright spot over her, one comes to the bottom of the list for all spot on another 40,794, less than half. 100% different. I was even hard to imagine that you are with Peter I was not kidding. :))
No new and old taxonomy. There taxon feisthamelii. Some interpret it as a species, others as a subspecies. All their arguments. It was originally described as a species in the genus Papilio, this author should be put in brackets. I have a question I do not know and do not stick to one of the parties does not.
Inaccurate, because an instance of too much flying. Rescued two views. :) Compounding that female. :)
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Mythimna congrua / Tentatively identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Mythimna congrua / Tentatively identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.
Basil, I did not kick, and indicates an error. And I write how to do if you do not know. And not realizing where these grievances, as a small child. Nakosyachil correct, and do not attack. We should not write on any site, and how. I nakosyachil you me fix say thank you. We're responsible for the accuracy of the website, not for personal ambitions. :)
Basil, the name must be in parentheses Iphiclides feisthamelii (Duponchel, 1832). And it is desirable that such things did the curator, the transfer of the subspecies in the form and on the basis of a print job. Since this is a moot point.
Leon, that's for sure Maniola, species in Portugal only jurtina. Very bright female network is given as ssp hispulla. http://www.first-nature.com/insects/lb-maniola-jurtina.php
I neponyal where it was written: where specific name or where clarification. But this information to determine why it removed?
Basil, wrong to think this is not Eudonia lacustrata, rather Scoparia basistrigalis, too, but I could be wrong, I have this group ognevok not like :(. Pointing to the kind of definition is necessary in the comments of the author, that would be a start of something. Determination to sort, it is also a definition. It is necessary to erase mobiole, if you specify the author definition, then it is ...
If you are unsure of the country put a question mark? Peru or Peru ?. will know that there are doubts about the author's photo or specifically: Peru? (country listed by the seller). The more concrete, the more confidence and that does not need to domyslivat. :))
Confused Peru, I understand Asian appearance. Quality tolerance. Wishing not use the flash and ambient light to do and take pictures with a tripod, at the maximum aperture is closed.
Basil, and you did not try to do sprinkled? Cut the butterflies from the entire frame to the increase was more?
Yuri, the author comments on the photos, you can change whenever you want. What is the problem? A 20-30 min. to correct typos and errors in the text of comments pictures for all participants. It's all right. :)
Corrected data. Not identified → Schiffermuelleria schaefferella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.