Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75... 169
Corrected data. Not identified → Gonepteryx aspasia / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.
Basil, but different, it is possible to mix small but well-grown caterpillars are different. Zeuzera pyrina from chitin have a powerful platform, which it is not Scardia boletella.
This species is identified correctly.
Corrected data. Alexander Belousov → Sergey Titov.
Aleksandr, it's easier for you habitats is one kind of this kind. Differences in the wing pattern to determine the species is not
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Celastrina argiolus / Confidently identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.
Corrected data. Not identified → Archips xylosteana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Chrysoteuchia culmella / Confidently identified / Alex Lender.
This name is not valid in general, generic combination is now Cephimallota colonella (Erschoff, 1874) Online http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/10431 (a synonym, and a typo, in the "Catalogue" Sineva)
This is a new word in entomology, 100% determination in appearance Egira. I have not heard it yet, but I would very much like to. :)
Corrected data. Alexander Belousov → Sergei Kotov.
Corrected data. Lacanobia thalassina / Vitaly Gumenuk → Lacanobia suasa / Basil Sergienko.
Corrected data. Confidently identified → Tentatively identified.
Corrected data. Orthosia gracilis / Andrey Ponomarev → Orthosia incerta / Basil Sergienko.
Corrected data. Orthosia gracilis / Andrey Ponomarev → Orthosia incerta / Basil Sergienko.
Basil, you are partly right, but to be honest, I do not know what subspecies in the Moscow region, and I'm not interested. But if you're interested you can specify the subtype. Only I beg you do not have to give instructions to put down there all subspecies. Who wants to clarify the systematic position, he will clarify who is not his right.
Basil, that is, you now write that you think clarify the systematic position superfluous, since you (personally), you know that there is nominative (in your collection there). Basil and who you such rubbish said the nominative is not written? Not written, in case if there is only a kind of nominative subspecies.And in the case where the determination to subspecies, is not essential. When ...
Basil, you put the name of the species or subspecies (nominative subspecies)?
Site entomological, not historical. :) Photography is really unfortunate.
Corrected data. Not identified → Ectephrina semilutata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Alexander Belousov → Basil Sergienko.
Corrected data. Alexander Belousov → Basil Sergienko.
Perhaps this picture is everywhere, in the south, too, all white cabbage butterflies are called, but really to see Pieris brassicae luck.
"Comments of the author" in this field must refer to a particular instance of that shown in the photo and the photo itself. In this case we are referring Comment successfully at the (whole text, except for size) and this information should be on the page, type in the "Commentaries." :)
Corrected data. Not identified → Pangrapta marmorata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Antigius butleri / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Favonius cognatus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Favonius cognatus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Atara arata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Glaucopsyche lycormas / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Amphipyra pyramidea / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Remove the author definition is not correct.
Corrected data.
Probably the only photo of this species in the network class. That would have to find where it is for 11 of the region from the blue.
A new species of hawk, to the north, much more unlikely than with color variations caterpillars widely ubiquitous species, who was there found. Sam found his tracks in the Arctic Circle in Yakutia.
Corrected data. Not identified → Hyles gallii / Confidently identified / Alexey Perelygin.
:))) Blue, nothing to do with the authors section of moths (VG Mironov, EA Belyaev SV Vasilenko), they worked on the literature data and collection, that's interesting, direct data on this region. What would the Europeans improve if there is this kind of fact finding in European Russia.
Corrected data. Sideridis kitti / Alexandr Zhakov → Sideridis reticulata / Sergei Kotov.
It is now only Peter can do. Strange specify the Volga-Don region, to Europe this kind where there is none. Where feet grow? :)
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Ochlodes sylvanus / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Ochlodes sylvanus / Confidently identified / Female / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Rheumaptera hastata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Boloria angarensis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Euphyia cineraria / Irina Nikulina → Euphyia unangulata / Basil Sergienko.
Corrected data. Not identified → Euphyia unangulata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Photos need to be replaced, overridden.
Corrected data. Noctua tirrenica / Alexandr Zhakov → Noctua fimbriata / Basil Sergienko.
Corrected data. Noctua tirrenica / Alexandr Zhakov → Noctua fimbriata / Basil Sergienko.
I for 2013, too, worked through routes and fare, but somehow it was all over the Caucasus)
Next page