Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81... 169
Il y Berlova correctly, it Cucullia pustulata fraterna Butler, 1878, is very similar. name of a subspecies, we can not finish, it can only make the author to stand Cucullia pustulata. Mark the other photos with this kind that do not I look :))
Corrected data. Not identified → Acosmetia chinensis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Battus devilliersii / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
Corrected data. Not identified → Battus devilliersii / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
Corrected data. Irina Nikulina → Yuriy Karpov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Idaea foedata / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Plebejus subsolanus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Plebejus subsolanus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Atara arata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Cupido argiades / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Lycaena dispar / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Avatha ncludens Walker, 1858 → Avatha noctuoides (Guenee, 1852).
It's only Basil could say that he wanted to write, have noctuoides completely different author.
Earlier, in the recent past was considered a synonym Heliothis maritima adaucta Heliothis maritima bulgarica subspecies Heliothis maritima After studies Fibiger currently Heliothi adaucta considered independent species that is on our website. Two solutions: 1.Ubrat as a kind Heliothi adaucta and bring it into subspecies Heliothis maritima; 2. Combine the information Heliothi adaucta and ...
Ira, you're right that initially it was decided that there was some sort of stability as a basis to take the catalog of blue. Now the situation has changed Institute curators appeared that in such moments can make a decision. Vasily full rights in terms of taxonomy. A small problem in the Asian part of Russia for two scoops curator.I looked at the site Svyatoslav adaucta. Now I'll try to put ...
Corrected data. Not identified → Deileptenia mandschuriaria / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Zanclognatha lunalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Agrius convolvuli / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Conistra fletcheri / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Conistra ardescens / Alexandr Zhakov → Conistra fletcheri / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Trichosea mjobergi / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Trichosea mjobergi / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Tiracola aureata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Thank you.
Corrected data. Not identified → Melitaea didyma / Confidently identified / Nikolay Grebennikov.
Podmoreny slightly (
Corrected data. Not identified → Datanoides fasciatus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Finder quickly locates all. :) I had doubts between these two species, but compared on jpmoth and stopped at ardescens. very similar, but has taken into account the form of the bond: basal and outer ardescens have it as it consists of polulunok, while fletcheri like solid with a slight bend. I can view a hindrance. But both highly volatile, can someone else will speak.Let's wait, but doubts ...
It expressed at lepiforum.de Jürgen Rodeland the assumption that the image belongs to the species Tegostoma lepidalis. (there are two photos). I looked at boldsystems.org, really it looks like, but still in the family Anthophilopsis.
Corrected data. Anthophilopsis baphialis / Alexandr Zhakov → Anthophilopsis lepidalis / Ozgur Kocak.
InsteadDeileptenia mandschuriaria?
The taxons were merged. Conistra filipjevi and Conistra filipjevi were merged.
Corrected data. Conistra fdipjevi Kononenko, 1978 → Conistra filipjevi Kononenko, 1978.
Of the 6 species of this genus for the 37 and 40 region, only 6 species, of which only looks like this :) But is only 40 region. It is desirable to clarify.
Of the 6 species of this genus for the 37 and 40 region, only 6 species, of which only looks like this :) But is only 40 region. It is desirable to clarify.
Corrected data. Not identified → Conistra ardescens / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
:)) At one point may be only one subspecies.
And this Utetheisa abraxoides?
Written descriptions described in the two years (1854-1855) 4 types with one and the same name varians, And Trilocha varians described either in 1854, or 1855 to various sources. Another smash his head with entering it on the site :))
Well, replace it, and it will remain so with trembling hands. :)) And rotate 7 degrees clockwise :))
And this is not a generic version of the combination, that this kind of http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/88535 Nyctemera varians Walker, 1854? The view was expressed by me should unite and put Nyctemera varians as a major.
Lord, you are wrong, it is impossible to remove all the things that you do not understand. You can sort through everything, but who will do it. When Peter filled the site with other resources, I do not know why, it has simplified and greatly simplified his task, all the relevant taxa from the cast sign = equating them to synonyms.Now, they can not be sorted out, only in some cases removed. But I ...
Corrected data.
Corrected data.
Crop the picture was difficult?
Corrected data. Not identified → Melitaea didyma / Confidently identified / Nikolay Grebennikov.
Basil = Take it as it is in the broad sense.I understand that when they made the site so as not to complicate its structure by replacing all of the terms associated with the valid name put this sign here and synonyms and generic combinations, and the names under which resulted in the literature, and the name is given incorrectly and other cases (I can not think of what else can be :)) is in ...
The taxons were merged. Gangarides gigantea and Gangarides gigantea were merged.
Corrected data. Euhampsonia gigantea (Druce, 1909) → Gangarides gigantea (Druce, 1909).
Paul wrote to mobiole: Earlier T. remicauda considered conspecific T. sommeri, , that's it is. not synonymous, but are listed under that name, did not distinguish between them. Now distinguish :))
News
- 17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
- 11.11.2024: The Community/Forum section has become more convenient
- 11.11.2024: Improved scaling of images in the Forum/Community
New photos (24.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 12:51, P. Khramov: Да, в галерею можно смело дублирова...
- 12:48, P. Khramov: Виктор, спасибо, зафиксировал, сдел...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Entomological seminar in Moscow on November 13
- A. Gordon, O. Gorbunov, V. Murzin on Russian TV in 2004
- Entomologist? What kind of job is it?
- The first IMAX 3D film on the monarch butterfly migration is on the go
