Pages: 1 ...90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98... 169
Corrected data. Not identified → Bhutanitis lidderdalii / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Basil, two kinds of issue raised Iran, not to "the beginning." Long comments, that does not add, and that does not take away from the butterfly, they help to determine the most likely, the species of the butterfly.With the unique ability to accurately determine the type, abandon it in favor of "philately" (normal collections, normally The prepared butterfly looks as aesthetically pleasing as The ...
Basil, I removed the definition of what would be on the search engines do not jump clear mistake, I simply do not know these types, but now is not the time to understand the evening bear :)
I would put in inaccurate, at best, as well as to the family. Basil, you persuade yourself? or other? For others, these arguments do not work, this data 30 years ago. Clearly states reliably different in the genitals. I, frankly, a few species can cause, it is very similar to this kind. There is a butterfly, it is necessary to cook. Only then accurate.
I would like the base were announced. I'm sure they are, but I do not think you can specify them. :)) The simplest option to cook. Images of all three species there. :)
Costal margin white, it is limited to the three listed species, taking into account the lack of literature for Oenospila altistrix distribution outside Borneo, you said Basil. I just showed you the options that you do not see what would change your opinion.I understand a complex issue, but it is impossible to grasp at first got a similar kind :)) Without editor butterfly looks much better. :))
Basil, I cite two more variants of Malaysia (Oenospila altistrix, lives there too): Oenospila kopperi http://biostor.org/reference/52698 (here an article with the original description) Oenospila microstrix http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-9/geometrini/geometrini_31_2.php (original description) White costal margin of wing, eaten Photo Editor, which gives the right to think about something ...
Dmitry is a male, the females outer bands on the upper wing gear. http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/02_EREBIDAE/15_EREBINAE/025_Thyas/Thyas%20javanica/Thyas%20javanica.htm
Vladimir, we responded at the same time :), but you're a little earlier :) Yes it is large tortoiseshell, but their two garden and black-haired. Now I look at this site large tortoiseshell garden named a large tortoiseshell. Therefore, on the basis of priority, I put you to determine the type. In the future, please, put in the definition of the Latin names that have not been dvoechteniya.:)) And ...
No, I have sinned in the Pyrausta falcatalis, but you do not have and should not be rasprostanenie have purpuralis on the lower wings of light band is narrow.
Basil, maybe I'm wrong, but you brought two definitions: 1 put in the name of Borbacha punctipardaria, 2 is less likely in the comments Borbacha altipardaria. Irina reasonably chose another option.So who determine the type of? :) I always try in such matters read all comments, and Vasily, if there are two versions of the definition, it is not necessary to give a name, and the second in the ...
Corrected data. Borbacha punctipardaria / Vasiliy Feoktistov → Borbacha altipardaria / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Borbacha punctipardaria / Vasiliy Feoktistov → Borbacha altipardaria / Irina Nikulina.