Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96... 169
Andrew agrees with the redefinition.?
Basil, if I'm not sure that male or female, you can not stand. :))
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
like here I put that buck ???
for at least another 4 from the region, but I have not looked in detail the spread, but the area they certainly are not as big.
It looks like that does not immediately found. But calm would leave is now.
Corrected data. Not identified → Limenitis populi / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Argynnis paphia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
This genus has six similar species (catalog Witt vol.4), but I would probably also determined the way, but inaccurate.
Merge http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/7134
Corrected data. → Stan Korb.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Not identified → Celypha flavipalpana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Is very similar. :) Vasily, it would be nice if just specify the size, time lines do not allow :))
Basil, the type was not transferred reaziruet no errors in the author's name.
I did this kind of information is taken from [45], but Vasily rights, somewhere there is an error and some description in 1970 are in error: Pseudohadena rjabovi Bonrsin 1970, Cryphia (Scythobrya) acharista Bonrsin 1970. or a mistake?
Corrected data. Not identified → Aricia artaxerxes / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Stanislav, you must specify 2012 or 2011.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Polyommatus icarus / Confidently identified / Female / Andrei Komrakov.
It is not Geometridae and Noctuidae, I kind of know the doge, in the net image is almost no need to cook. :))
Three signs are confused: 1. pink lower wings 2. Both middle of the red framed black sling, 3. Radical red sash reaches almost to the bottom edge, at perornata only to the middle. individually can be ignored, but all together confirms the decision of Basil.
Corrected data. Andrey Proplyetkin → Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Neptis thisbe / Andrey Proplyetkin → Neptis ilos / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Neptis thisbe → Neptis ilos.
Corrected data. Not identified → Araschnia levana / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Polyommatus thersites / Pavel Ivanov → Polyommatus icarus / Alexandr Zhakov.
the rest of the genital act so well? Here is full of them. All species that have two or more possible answers, and not how it shows the advantage of one of them, are not certain. That's just the problem, it is necessary to know these options, and then Vasily wrong. I would like to see all the official theme: here is full of them :)
I agree with Vasily. :)
Probably another type.
In flight Autographa gamma :))
Also, only a certain race.
It seems that the truth. Nothing similar is not the network.
In uncertain. Only race.
Corrected data. Not identified → Graphium antiphates / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
Corrected data. Not identified → Prioneris philonome / Confidently identified / Andrey Kravtsov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Prioneris philonome / Confidently identified / Andrey Kravtsov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Lygephila vulcanea / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Polyommatus thersites / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
I still see and probably will be in the exact, does not hurry. :)
emaculata have Kononenko is another butterfly, vulcanea - only with yellow scales, similar legofil not see, but Kononenko, it is somewhat brighter.
Corrected data. Lygephila craccae / Vitaly Gumenuk → Lygephila viciae / Alexandr Zhakov.
Lygephila vulcanea?
A label where?
I got it, on the first question. In the second, the extra information is requested to remove, in the form of inaccurate, comments the author details, and all of them it is clear that that does not understand :)
Question 1: Why and on Russian and English version, the English text, the author's comments? Question 2 .: Are there additional information that it is not a precise definition, or a new form of either a new kind ?. I think that says it all in the comments of the author. Or I mistranslated?
Corrected data. Not identified → Lycaena helle / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.
Corrected data. Not identified → Lycaena helle / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.
Corrected data. Not identified → Morpho menelaus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
Dmitri if endure :) I'm sure the difference between marcella and corita dimly see. :)
Dmitry, I apologize, it's about sex mean the information Basil :)
News
- 12.10.2024: Fixed sorting/ordering errors (Gallery and Catalog sections)
- 10.10.2024: We fixed bad situation with photo captions for insect species that are not yet in the website database
- 31.08.2024: Первые итоги интеграции/переноса/дублирования Молбиола и Инсекты
New photos (21.10.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 18:38, P. Khramov: Orthoptera / Confidently identified...
- 19:36, E. Shcherbakov: Acrididae sp., может быть Ailopus s...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Meantime in Japan
- Interview with Alexander Zatakovoy, one of the wild Russian entomologists
- Meanwhile, at the "Reptilium"
- “Butterfly” in 300 world languages and dialects
