Pages: 1 ...558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566... 629
Well, another interesting thing has surfaced: the dimorphism of Psophus stridulus females, possibly with a dispersal value: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=133669&st=1992#
As far as I know, anything is possible for money. There should be companies involved in "commercial sequencing" on the Internet, or something like that.In St. Petersburg, I could suggest contacts.
Names of States should be capitalized...... Mine is yours, don't understand.... it's not a shame to embarrass yourself, is it?This post was edited by Entoterra - 18.01.2012 14: 18
no one will answer the subject there.can you tell us here proven online shops, without inflated prices and with a good assortment?I don't think there are many of them.This post was edited by Cloyster - 13.01.2012 23: 36
it is necessary to be able to distinguish from 3 types, for example, known from Tishechkin, 1988 from the Moscow region.in my imho, the Genus is common in dry meadows, apparently on some cereals.. sometimes dominant among the cicadas, "poor" coenoses...... I can see the kind of sluggishness in alcohol fees, who will pass it on?...
Can anybody elaborate on the difference between this shot and that one: http://lepidoptera.pro/species/plebejus-argus/.
It is quite possible that the splinter will not even be in the cells of the intestine, but in its lumen. If a gene needs to be transduced into insect cells, it may be better to use an appropriate viral vector. To work with insects, baculovirus vectors are often used (they are, however, fungal).
Due to some major renewals of the website species database the manual adding of species is temporarily unavailable. Thus, for a while there can be longer delays than usual in getting published photos of butterflies/moths which are not yet databased. Photos of already databased species are published properly, as always.
Ah, yeah, that's my blunt. They have such big differences in forewings that there can be no questions. Goes to M. jurtina.
You're talking about the formal side, but I was asking about something else, something high.And I think that there is nothing "high" in the description of the new taxon, this is a formality.The more it hurts my eyes when journalists write " * * * A NEW SPECIES OF BUTTERFLIES has BEEN DISCOVERED!!!*** "-- which nah is open?!! Is this a law of physics?!
By the way found a source. book "Butterflies" Publishing ACT 2002. By publishing "Mosaik Verlag" (Germany).
This is a photo from the Internet, the one. what I have is the same, but nothing is sitting on it yet. Already in reserve.
The task was to cross the lines drosophila Net and Purple(pr). It turned out to establish that the purple eye color of the Pr line is associated with gender, but with the distinctive feature of the Net line - wing venation, there was a hitch. Too few drosophilae flew out and I can't say for sure, and the practice time is running out Do not let the jelly disappear, tell me who knows how wing ...