Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592... 627

19.01.2011 15:06, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #1964

Shot moved to Thera obeliscata.

19.01.2011 14:38, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #1956

Corrected.

19.01.2011 13:03, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3667

Thanks, moved.

19.01.2011 8:12, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #2540

This species is identified correctly.

19.01.2011 8:04, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #3052

This species is identified correctly.

19.01.2011 7:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #2985

No, no label, but this one is surely from Columbia. Tough guys, say.

19.01.2011 7:29, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #2194

This species is identified correctly.

19.01.2011 7:29, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #1122

This species is identified correctly.

19.01.2011 2:19, Peter Khramov: comment on Periphanes cora

Ok, it remains as it is, with the added synonym.

19.01.2011 2:19, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3645

Moved.

19.01.2011 2:18, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3646

Moved.

19.01.2011 2:18, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3644

Ok then, moved.

19.01.2011 0:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on Pending publication

Just those photos for a long time hanging (the very first throw). Some have already been published on the website of that series, so I thought that the others do not need

18.01.2011 23:28, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #2833

Updated.

18.01.2011 23:28, Peter Khramov: comment on Doxocopa laurentia

Stand Dmitry comments for this picture http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/2833/

18.01.2011 16:31, Peter Khramov: comment on Eumedonia eumedon

Ok, I leave it until it is.

18.01.2011 15:24, Peter Khramov: comment on Acronicta strigosa

MEND.

18.01.2011 12:30, Serg Svetlov: comment on Genus Nebria Latr., 1825 (Nebriini, Carabinae, Carabidae)

Well, everything is so, the copy was very soft during the capture, fresh, therefore not "fully painted"

18.01.2011 11:54, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #4516

This species is identified correctly.

18.01.2011 11:48, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #4514

This species is identified correctly.

18.01.2011 11:48, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #1015

This species is identified correctly.

18.01.2011 11:40, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #4511

This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 22:41, Natalia Demchenko: comment on photo #4453

Hydria cervinalis.

17.01.2011 22:25, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #2064

Tatyana, Vlad, thanks. Moved to X. ferrugata, "identified successfully".

17.01.2011 22:25, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3610

Moved to "identified successfully".

17.01.2011 22:21, Peter Khramov: comment on Graphium weiskei

Apparently, a typo. Corrected.

17.01.2011 22:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4475

This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 22:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4466

This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 22:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4474

This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 22:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4473

This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 22:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #4463

This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 21:22, Peter Khramov: comment on 127 new photos of butterflies

Publish the next batch of photos. Photos provided 11 of our authors - Tatyana Gordeeva Natalia Demchenko, Hope Flegontova, Eugene Davkaev Alexander Zhakov, Elvir Izmailov, Yevgeny Komarov, Andrey Lyutikov Dmitry Pozhogin, Andrey Sazykin and Vasiliy Feoktistov.Thank you! The total number of photons in the gallery exceeded 3000, which is also nice.

17.01.2011 17:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #2971

This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 17:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #2855

This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 17:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Morpho aega

Kind of interesting because it is the smallest species of the genus Morpho. The wingspan of no more than our butterfly Machaon.

17.01.2011 15:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Heteropterus morpheus

View quite unfairly listed in the KK Moscow area in my opinion. It is not rare for us, but rather local.

17.01.2011 14:58, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #2548

Comment moved to photo, photo did to Drasteria picta.

17.01.2011 14:56, Peter Khramov: comment on Drasteria cailino

Note moved to the 8918 photo.

17.01.2011 14:55, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3909

Shot moved.

17.01.2011 14:53, Peter Khramov: comment on Papilio jordani

Comments postponed to 3909 photos.

17.01.2011 14:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #4166

This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 14:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #4128

This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 14:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #4129

This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 14:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #4127

This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 14:39, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3690

Comments moved to the species description page.

17.01.2011 14:24, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #4049

Moved then.

17.01.2011 13:31, Peter Khramov: comment on Poll

Now I try again in Opera - everything is OK. Perhaps you should configure the time you store cookies, or they do from time to time clean. I do not see what else you can think of.