Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593... 627

17.01.2011 12:57, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #2248

This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 12:55, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #2696

This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 12:52, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #2242

This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 11:11, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #3777

This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 11:11, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #3776

This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 11:10, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #3920

This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 11:10, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #3925

This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 11:10, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #3924

This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 11:07, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #4055

This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 11:05, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #1648

This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 9:25, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on Ivela ochropoda

It is found in the east of the Trans-Baikal, Amur region, Primorye; Northeastern. and east. China, Japan.

17.01.2011 9:11, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #3918

This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 9:11, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #3917

This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 9:11, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #3244

This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 23:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #3824

Hard to identify exactly without underside. Anyway, seems to be ligea.

16.01.2011 22:56, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3955

Moved.

16.01.2011 22:56, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3530

Moved.

16.01.2011 22:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on Papilio thoas

subspecies thoas- North SA autocles Rothschild & Jordan, 1906 - South US- Nicaragua nealces Rothschild & Jordan, 1906 Nikaragua- Ecuador melonius Rothschild & Jordan Jamaica cyniras Ménétriés, 1857 Ekvador- Amazonia (sometimes isolated as an independent kind) oviedo Gundlach, 1866 Cuba thoantiades Burmeister Argentina brasiliensis Rothschild & Jordan, 1906 South Brazil, Uruguay, ...

16.01.2011 21:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3020

Subspecies, please. Thoas obliges.

16.01.2011 17:16, Evgeny Komarov: comment on Zerynthia polyxena

In fact, in the south of European Russia banal species occurring in the mass throughout the locus kirkazona. The apparent rarity of this type may be associated with a fairly short time, the summer of adults (in the Volgograd region from mid-April to mid-May).

16.01.2011 16:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on Papilio nephelus

subspecies nephelus Java sunatus Corbet, 1940 Peninsular Malaya annulus Pendlebury, 1936 Peninsular Malaya chaon Westwood, 1844 Orissa, Nepal - Assam, N.Burma ducenarius Fruhstorfer, 1908 S.Burma chaonulus Fruhstorfer S.China, Haina, Taiwan albolineatus Forbes Sumatra, Borneo siporanus Hagan Menawai Is tellonus Fruhstorfer Batu Is. uranus Weymer Nias rileyi Fruhstorfer, 1913

16.01.2011 16:13, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #1895

This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 16:13, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #1753

This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 16:13, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #1754

This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 16:12, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #1190

This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 16:01, Peter Khramov: comment on On confirmation of allegiance to identify species in the photo

Rhode Neographium removed from the system, marcellus ordered to Eurytides with prostanovkoy as a synonym Neographium marcellus.

16.01.2011 15:29, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #3320

This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:27, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #3325

This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:19, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #2223

This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:16, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #1821

This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:13, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #1392

This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:10, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #1676

This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:08, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #1757

This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:08, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #3122

This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:08, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #4103

This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:07, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #4104

This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:05, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #4013

This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:04, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #1969

This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:01, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #3485

This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:00, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #1904

This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:00, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #1905

This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 14:35, Peter Khramov: comment on Schrankia balneorum

Ok, corrected.

16.01.2011 14:34, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3586

Alexandr, thanks for identifying. Photo moved.

16.01.2011 14:32, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3590

Continue talking of subspecies: now one can get subspecies info only at species description pages, reading descriptions or comments (as Dmitry and Alexandr have been adding such comments). But one can't tell looking at the image if there is any subspecies info or not (if subspecies was specified at all). I think, that now there is no need in individual subspecies pages. Nevertheless, we should ...