Pages: 1 ...17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25... 629
I move photos without species identification to upperspecies taxa, so that it would be easier for specialists to search for them and identificate the species.
I move photos without species identification to upperspecies taxa, so that it would be easier for specialists to search for them and identificate the species.
I move photos without species identification to upperspecies taxa, so that it would be easier for specialists to search for them and identificate the species.
I move photos without species identification to upperspecies taxa, so that it would be easier for specialists to search for them and identificate the species.
I move photos without species identification to upperspecies taxa, so that it would be easier for specialists to search for them and identificate the species.
I move photos without species identification to upperspecies taxa, so that it would be easier for specialists to search for them and identificate the species.
I move photos without species identification to upperspecies taxa, so that it would be easier for specialists to search for them and identificate the species.
I move the photo to the fergana subspecies. If fergana is not a synonym for maracandica, let me know...
Corrected data. Satyrinae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov → Karanasa maureri / Tentatively identified / Maxim Maximov.
Corrected data. Satyrinae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov → Karanasa maureri / Tentatively identified / Maxim Maximov.
The microflora will eat itself, the main thing is to feed it with nitrogen, for example, to shed carbamide regularly. Then the bronzes will breed there, the beetles will find your sawdust themselves
Zhuki Photo Contest https://35awards.com/page/contests/num/694/photographers/I looked at the very first one (like the best one?) the image is a very mediocre stacking result with eye-catching artifacts. Eduardo Modolo gets a Strong fi from me!
I am sure that within a radius of 10 km there will be many more polyxena breeding points. This is not at all a rare butterfly from the steppe zone. Tea is not Apollo. But it has a long-term population dynamics that is spasmodic, and in some years it is possible not to meet any of them at all. The pupa sometimes lies for several years. So what you didn't find in a particular year is not an ...
I don't know about cicadas, but the Internet writes the absolute truth about cicadas. They suck blood like pastel bedbugs, and the consequences are similarly unpleasant. The same goes for many bedbugs, both carnivorous and herbivorous. They are all hungry for human blood. The oral apparatus of all these people is fundamentally the same - piercing-sucking, hemipteroid, the most convenient for ...
From 20th to 21st of August we carried out some works to increase the speed of the website pages loading (earlier some pages would load for about 10 seconds, not mentioning bots raids when things were getting even worse). Now overall page loading is notably faster, and some catalog pages load faster even in several times. Following steps for speed increasing are planned for the end of this week ...
They eat birch, as I expected, but they are capricious, it is important for them that the leaves stand vertically) A few pupated in July)
Corrected data. Nymphalidae / Imago / Vera Volkotrub → Argynnis anadyomene / Female / Maxim Maximov.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Polyommatus icarus / Confidently identified / Female / Maxim Maximov.
I move photos without species identification to upperspecies taxa, so that it would be easier for specialists to search for them and identificate the species.
Initial identification by Juergen Peters: "male Phasia hemiptera of the more femalish obscura-Form."
No, plastic is not that, there is little adhesion (the wings slip off constantly) and it does not "breathe", it dries longer. Or maybe my hands are in the wrong place.Well, the edges of the wing are quite visible on a light background through tracing paper, and even through tissue paper. And what's the point of seeing more? Admire - after removing from the straightener.If you only knew what this ...
I don't know anything about a digital microscope, but a DSLR with a whale lens doesn't work at all. For small things at an inexpensive price, the Soviet biological microscope (MBR, MBI, Biolam), slightly modified in terms of lighting, is suitable, always with a 3.7 X LOMO lens in combination with a mirrorless camera. A DSLR will also work, just the mirror will hang around. You can keep within 10 ...