Pages: 1 ...380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388... 629
Corrected data. Not identified → Phyllonorycter populifoliella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Phyllonorycter populifoliella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Phyllonorycter populifoliella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Caloptilia elongella / Vasiliy Feoktistov → Caloptilia populetorum / Andrey Ponomarev.
Andrew done. Punctual :) If a butterfly, a certain Alexander made yayki, hence their determination belongs to Alexander. Iron logic :)
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Risoba walshae / Tentatively identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.
For two species (including this): http://szmn.sbras.ru/Lepidop/Arctiid.htm In the summer, we have identified them with you from all kinds of Argina Asian species (there are comments), and the impetus for this separation served as a commentary on molbiole VV Dubatolov exposed to me there is a butterfly :)
Dmitrich, we are talking about far from scientific material. I doubt very much that many people collect Troides for purely scientific purposes. For the most part, these are themed collections in shop windows, exclusively for beauty, although labeled according to all the rules, and in this case, a mangy butterfly spoils the whole look, so why not bother with restoration?lunkov, try the soot from ...
That's right, Fyodor, is on the left in Latin - dzidzula (s) and dzidzina)) On the right, you can hear the translation into Russian)
Please, Peter, went through the DV gently and just in case I give all this without inf .: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23078 http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23154 http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23087 http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23155 http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23261 http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23088 http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23080 http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23208
Basil, and a European? http://lepidoptera.ru not believe :)) By mothsofborneo.com you yourself have repeatedly expressed doubt that he was not consistent with your answer choice, but there are images of the genitals, that's the key to a guaranteed definition. http: //www.boldsystems.org American and there (repeat) under that specific name of three butterflies, and only one corresponds to your ...
Stas, you can throw a source that can be prostavyat as adding species taxon in? It would be better with a preliminary zaneneseniem him in Literature section (if it is not there).
Stas, you can throw a source that can be prostavyat as an addendum of this taxon in the system? It would be better with a preliminary zaneneseniem him in Literature section (if it is not there).
I suggest not to bathe. Soon I completed yet interface for curators taxa, and Stas himself all can move, where it sees fit.
To carry Polyommatus juldusa (Staudinger, 1886) or Polyommatus iphigenia (Herrich-Schaffer, 1847) or Polyommatus rueckbeili (Forster, 1960), which is not in the catalog?
I decided to download a second, the last copies. this rare, major and his unique moth. You would not say that it is mikrocheshuekryloe :)