Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322... 497
The fifth (last) Age. It should be noted in the top line.
The fifth (last) Age. It should be noted in the top line.
The fourth age. It should be noted in the top line.
The fifth (last) Age. It should be noted in the top line.
Re Vladimir belly. "No, Basil, is molting. And the skin is, as usual, was alone in a corner. But after molting has not fed ..." Vladimir, you're right. Sorry. That I did not notice simple: you have two photos just different age caterpillars. Here is a picture: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/40570 penultimate age. And in this photo: http: // lepidoptera.ru / gallery / 40569 last age))) It ...
Alexander, totally agree. Someone says one thing and someone else. You can not fit under one standard all the comments, and the more thoughts of different people. It applies to you and me ..... Actually all. It all began with exact dates of life certain dolls.pupae and from a specific region on the page of the form ((( It was enough to simply specify: "The pupal stage lasts for two weeks," , ...
Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 42—51 mm. Flight time: June, July, August, September → June, July, August, September, October.
Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 34—40 mm. Flight time: No formalized data → May, June, July, August, September.
Not really: all is not lost. Despite the fact that all contain opium poppies: the poppy "east" and not real, "opium" :)
Peter flies off transfer. Nothing it did in the LC. Only otkommentil otkommentit how could anyone other user .... And still flew (((
Corrected data. Vasiliy Feoktistov → Basil Sergienko.
Corrected data. Vasiliy Feoktistov → Basil Sergienko.
Vladimir, I think that it is you do not shed (it seemed to you), but just died (( The thing is that you have my photos on: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/40569 last age)))
Alexander, the string "Comment author" specific to the taxonomy has not. The author writes his, personal comment on the butterfly, which is shown in the photo. And as long as it will be called "Comment author": so be it.As for the top line: there I also did not clarify on the taxonomy, and in essence (permitted with). P.S. My advice to you: do not stop and exposes himself to the ugly side. I ...
Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 33—38 mm. Flight time: No formalized data → June, July.
I cite data from Svoge trusted source and it has data on all raznousym encountered in my region. These data obobshёnnye ie suitable for the whole area. This source is not in the office. literature (it is unique) and tell me no reason. It is enough that there is a significant infa there.So I spend a private message. I feed her only once on a birch. What have in their comments to the ...
The same butterfly that I previously took for Moths. Thank you Vasily vnёsshemu clarity ... Avon turned out :)
Corrected data. Vasiliy Feoktistov → Basil Sergienko.
Corrected data. Vasiliy Feoktistov → Basil Sergienko.
Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 38—35 mm. Flight time: No formalized data → June, July, August.
Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 30—38 mm. Flight time: June, July, August, September, October → May, June, July, August, September, October.
Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 28—43 mm. Flight time: No formalized data → June, July, August.
Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 32—38 mm. Flight time: No formalized data → June, July, August, September.
Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 36—46 mm. Flight time: No formalized data → June, July, August.
Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 42—48 mm. Flight time: May, June, August → May, June, July, August.
Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 28—36 mm.
Alexander, let me answer for Fedor. On the page of the form must be exactly the generalized information on species as a whole and not for individual or multiple instances of a single point. It is much more appropriate to write it on a page with a specific photo. An example of my comment: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/40849 That is how I see the picture and Fedor is absolutely right.
Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 24—30 mm.
Corrected data. Flight time: April, May, June → April, May, June, July.
Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 35—40 mm. Flight time: No formalized data → April, May, June.
Thank you, Alexander. The most important thing I brought this couple overnight and one stain. Side by side on the canvas sat :)
Whew ... this outing almost all (one Moths left for later). All species that today website Download one point and assembled in half an hour))) He took a self-selective: only those butterflies, which are considered interesting for yourself. Alexander, look, please the two Mythimna sp. and two Xestia sp. the correctness of the definition. Any I have with them ((
Yuri, her imago flies from June to August (ie all summer recklessly), and most likely in two generations. That is why I see no reason to prostanovka specific dates it is on the page of a particular type .. Ref copies. - Please, but only on his page and nothing more.
Alexander, for information related to a single instance (and in this case it is definitely him and assigned) is the "author comment", which is under a particular image. And the page type is not necessary to make. This is my personal opinion and it'll stay.
And tea is not the first year live :) Date the picture pupa look: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/41249 As an example of my personal observation: imago of this kind from one point collected in this year's series of the normal from early June to the 4th of July (and will long flight of). She stretched and the flight of the date respectively from pupae are different.
"With the end of the first decade of June until the end of the third (10.06--30.06). Next comes the imago." Message. Yuri Semeykin. Yuri, here is the information and even dates should not have put as a sign of species. It is based on a single item and therefore to him should be and is. A page of the form of this kind should not be ad-libbing.Here it is necessary to bring the summary data for ...
Corrected data. Imago → Female.
Yuri will join Alexander. The top line is necessary to write the following: ssp. aegrota (Butler, 1877) :)
Not worth it to unite a group of doll and photos of butterflies, and they just had to hang on to the one already existing group with a caterpillar. I repeat: to merge the two groups can not be ready :)
Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #41234 group.
Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #41242 group.
Corrected data. The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.
Corrected data. The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.
Corrected data. The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.
Corrected data. The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.
Alexander, and without it the same editor) Therefore suffered in octogenaria (it's better to be there).
Corrected data. Hoplodrina blanda / Vasiliy Feoktistov → Hoplodrina octogenaria / Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Hoplodrina blanda / Vasiliy Feoktistov → Hoplodrina octogenaria / Alexandr Zhakov.
Error deliberately excluded only one thing: that it is a female ("seasoned eggs" straight into the stain) :) Alexander, look, please define)))
Leon, something you have links kilometer obtained. We must deal with it :) I recommend to try this thing: http://goo.gl/
News
- 12.10.2024: Fixed sorting/ordering errors (Gallery and Catalog sections)
- 10.10.2024: We fixed bad situation with photo captions for insect species that are not yet in the website database
- 31.08.2024: Первые итоги интеграции/переноса/дублирования Молбиола и Инсекты
New photos (13.10.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 17:48, P. Khramov: In some cases, sorting/ordering in ...
- 17:43, P. Khramov: Comments that concerned incorrect p...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Meantime in Japan
- Entomologist? What kind of job is it?
- Meanwhile, at the "Reptilium"
- Butterflies and music: The Cranberries, Just My Imagination
